How would a student feel if they knew that the USDA allowed the school to provide meals which could make them unhealthy, or even sick? Lunch, as most know, is a very important part of a student’s school day. The food eaten at lunch should provide enough energy to complete the school day as a focused, learning student, and, for some students, to get through after school activities such as athletics and clubs; however, it is being seen more and more often that this is not the case. Chatham County Schools needs to improve its school lunches because the quantity, quality, and cost ratios are inadequate for the success of their students.…
Recently there has been revisions to the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and schools were required to overhaul their entire menus to provide the students with healthy and nutritious foods including fruits and vegetables. The new school lunch rules are part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 which has been implemented this fall. (Post Standard) The Hunger Act allows the USDA the opportunity to make reforms to the school lunch and breakfast programs. With these revisions come strict guidelines from the federal government that each school district must follow in order to receive funding and reimbursement (National School Lunch Program, 2012, August p. 1). In this essay i will be comparing the positive and negative effects of these recent revisions to the NSLP. I will then discuss whether or not these changes are beneficial to the children receiving the meal and whether NSLP is leaving children hungry or helping children make healthy food choices.…
First, students are not buying these new, healthier lunches because they cannot enjoy them. The lunches from before and the lunches now are so drastically different from before they find it hard to eat. Whether because it’s because of the cooks not being able to make them work or it’s the food itself. These lunches are not being sold. Something must be done or majority of students will either eat home lunches or simply not eat at all, which is bad for their health and will hurt them.…
New federal guidelines designed to get kids to eat more healthful meals have taken effect with the new school year. Targeting fat, sodium and calories, the rules aim to increase the fruits, vegetables and whole grains in school lunches.…
1. Julia says she and her classmates are now more open to eating healthier lunch options. What caused this?…
Do you like food, but school lunches are unhealthy, are you trying to get in shape well ask yourself would healthier food suit you better and set you on the right path to achieve healthiness at a young age. At some schools are serving junk food and unhealthy food at school which is causing childhood obesity. With new nutrition guidelines, children can eat healthier and become healthier .…
According to the USDA, the new rule for providing healthy Brake fast and lunch to improve health will start July 1 and will be served for 3 years. The number of students who use school meal is increasing by 5.5 million yearly, and as the same time the expense is rising up from $6.6 billion to close $14.4 billion yearly. Based on the information majority of the kids in the school eat their breakfast and lunch at school so it is very important to provide healthy food to reduce obesity, and to provide appropriate or verity nutrition.…
When I was in elementary school I remember when I used to go one the lunch line and the lunch ladies would serve us our lunches then we would get to buy snacks like different types of chips, ice cream, cookies, and chocolate bars. As I grew older it was always the same but there were more snacks and different types of drinks so instead of milk you could Capri-suns, Gatorade, Snapple’s and sodas. The one year out of nowhere there were no more sodas and all the chips where baked instead…
Why wait in line when you can get your food launched towards you within seconds? This could be the spark of a new ongoing debate about whether or not launching lunches through the air is the best solution to the lunch line congestion. The thought of having a machine launch food towards you sounds almost as crazy as it did when Steve Jobs introduced the first iPhone, however, nothing is impossible. Schools all over the nation use similar methods to distribute lunch to their students and some believe it is time to start a new innovation that improves the long lines during lunch and benefits the school overall. On the contrary, opposing views feel as though this new method is going to be costly and produce safety hazards. Though this new system…
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) gives schools cash and commodities to set the cost of the program's food and foodservice. Added cash is provided to lunches for low-income children. To participate in the program, schools must serve lunches that meet Federal nutritional requirements and offer free and cheap lunches to children determined eligible for such benefits”(Price, Kuhn 1). Taking care of the future is a necessity and the national school lunch program reduces prices and brings in better food…
Next, there needs to be better lunches at the cafeteria at HMS. First of all, the lunches need to be bigger so the students can eat more. Before it was stated that students need food to focus in class. The current lunch sizes are for elementary schoolers. Middle schoolers are growing and need more food. Some people believe that the lunch sizes are fine but they are wrong because the kids will still be hungry. Ask the students, make a survey they will be hungry after lunch. They don’t have enough food and the little food we get is not even filling. For example, they have five small chicken wings that cost four dollars. The amount of chicken wings that we get is worth $1. Next, more kids will eat and it will be good for health. The school can…
The best way to stop the need to “squeeze” is by increasing the school lunch budget. A way to accomplish this could be done by borrowing elements from how the school lunch programs are in other places. For instance, Japan’s lunch program is set up so that “"municipalities pay for labor costs, but parents—billed monthly—pay for the ingredients, about $3 per meal, with reduced and free options for poorer families,"” (Woldow). This way more money is going into the budget, but there are still options for those who cannot afford it. If the National School Lunch Program were to take elements from them, like billing for the quality ingredients, then more students would participate.…
If the government gave schools a bigger budget for healthier lunches it could potentially save the government money in the future. It could save them money because if the students have a healthier diet they should have fewer health problems, meaning less hospital visit or anything relating. A sane diet could save tens if not hundreds of billions of dollars in health care costs (Mark Bittman SR1). If they saved that much money they could put that money into something else like…
The state of school lunches has been a point of debate for many since Michelle Obama’s Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act signed into law December of 2010, giving full authority to the USDA in setting the nutritional standards for all foods regularly sold in school lunch lines, stores, and vending machines. The law was set to provide additional funding to meet the updated standards, however, the cost was severely underestimated. Using data provided by Medicaid, eligibility for the free or reduced school lunch programs has seen a definite increase, although participation has not (Lee, 2010). In a press release, U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius was quoted saying “The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act is a significant step forward in our effort to help America's children thrive and grow to be healthy adults... By increasing the number of students eligible to enroll in school meal programs and improving the quality of food served, this legislation simultaneously tackles both hunger and the obesity levels currently affecting too many communities across this nation.” I would like to draw attention to her careful wording of “...step forward in our effort...” A subject as incredibly important as the nutrition of…
This same factor has a ripple effect on the student because it also limits them on what various types of meals they can choose during lunch hour, a poor selection of unhealthy foods leads to poor dieting. “The reimbursement rate for a reduced-price lunch is $2.17 and 24 cents for a paid meal. When you factor in labor and other school costs, schools have less than $1 per day per student to spend on food for lunch”(C.P.F.). Limiting yourself to just $1 dollar to use towards food would be nearly impossible to survive off of, let alone to eat or choose a healthy meal. This not only limits student and young adults of what they are able to eat during lunch if they cannot afford to bring their own lunch, but it also gets them into the habit of making a poor choice in food. “Fewer than 15 percent of the two million American elementary school-aged children eat the recommended five or more daily servings of fruits and vegetables" (Myrdal). If these poor eating habits continue or continue decrease, than the obesity will only continue to grow. In order for our young children of America to begin to change their unhealthy eating habits, parents and other leaders must promote healthy eating habits and explain the importance of proper dieting, which can start by cutting back on processed…