‘The more science advances, the more religion will decline.’ To what extent do you agree? (2008)
‘Science and religion will always conflict.’ Discuss. (2002)
Should scientific research be dictated by ethical concerns?
Do moral standards impede the progress of science?
‘Science cannot stop while ethics catches up.’ (Elvin Stackman) What is your view?
Do moral judgements compromise the true spirit of scientific inquiry?
Studies of scientists' belief in God
(stats)
-Many studies have been conducted in the United States and have generally found that scientists are less likely to believe in God than the rest of the population. Precise definitions and statistics vary, but generally about 1/3 are atheists, 1/3 agnostic, and 1/3 believe in God. Belief also varies by field: psychologists, physicists and engineers are less likely to believe in God than mathematicians, biologists and chemists. Doctors in the United States are much more likely to believe in God (76%).
Some of the most recent research into scientists' self reported belief in God is discussed by Professor Elaine Howard Ecklund. Some of her most interesting findings were that scientist-believers generally considered themselves "religious liberals" (not fundamentalists), and that their religion did not change the way they did science, but rather the way they reflected on its implications. Ecklund also discusses how there is a stigma against belief in God in the professional science community, which may have contributed to underrepresentation of religious voices in the field.
-2009 poll by Pew Research Center found that 33% of American scientists say they believe in God. 48% say they have a religious affiliation, equal to the number who say they are not affiliated with any religious tradition. The survey also found younger scientists to be "substantially more likely than their older counterparts to say they believe in God". Among the surveyed fields, chemists were the most likely to say they believe in God.
-Religious beliefs of US professors, many in scientific fields, were recently examined using a nationally representative sample of more than 1400, published in Sociology of Religion. The researchers reported that "Contrary to the view that religious skepticism predominates in the academy, we find that the majority of professors, even at elite research institutions, are religious believers.
-Many theistic arguments in defense of the existence of a god involve arguing that certain events that have not yet been fully explained by naturalistic science are unexplainable in principle by naturalistic science. Thus, the only "explanation" available is the supernatural, which according to religious theists establishes a justification for believing in their god. This is a serious misunderstanding of science because something unexplained is not necessarily unexplainable.
Such theists certainly can't claim to know enough about science and the universe to know that such events are unexplainable — that would involve them knowing far more than the scientists studying the phenomena. Scientists acquire knowledge through careful study and testing of the universe we live in; these theists are making pronouncements without the benefit of either.
-So, is the existence of "God" a subject which science cannot answer? That depends entirely on how "God" is defined by believers. Some can be proven or disproven empirically or logically and some cannot — but those which cannot are defined in ways which are too vague or incoherent to properly evaluate. In such cases, it also isn't very reasonable to believe in them, and religious theists are only fooling themselves if they think this is a way to avoid providing rational defenses of their claims.
Any alleged deity which is claimed to interact with the world we live in is a deity which should have empirical effects — and that constitutes potential evidence for or against the existence of said deity. Only gods without any impact on our world are beyond empirical investigation, but such gods are also without any real relevance for us. Even if they are somehow not unreasonable to believe in, they certainly aren't worth basing an entire life around.
-detailed survey of almost 1,700 scientists at elite American research universities -- the most comprehensive such study to date. These surveys and 275 lengthy follow-up interviews reveal that scientists often practice a closeted faith. They worry how their peers would react to learning about their religious views.
Fully half of these top scientists are religious. Only five of the 275 interviewees actively oppose religion. Even among the third who are atheists, many consider themselves "spiritual." One describes this spiritual atheism as being rooted in "wonder about the complexity and the majesty of existence," a sentiment many nonscientists -- religious or not -- would recognize.
-However, as the human race has grown and advanced itself, many ideas expressed by religion seem less and less plausible. Advances in science and technology have yielded a new breed of human thought that has disturbed and shaken the foundations of religious ideology. Our new, scientifically grounded understanding of the universe has unfolded a plethora of answers to age-old questions, which are antithetical to the explanations offered by religion. As strong scientific evidence has surfaced which is contrary to the prevailing religious view, open-minded believers have adapted their beliefs accordingly, but many fundamentalists refuse to accept scientific evidence. This is the root of the dilemma between science and religion. Many philosophers and theists have offered their views concerning the ongoing battle between science and religion.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Evans, W and Priest, S. H. 1995. Science content and social context. Public Understanding of Science. 4: 327-340.…
- 51670 Words
- 207 Pages
Good Essays -
In the article,"Why do many Reasonable People doubt Science?", the writer, Joel Achenbach, asserts that people disbelief science for a variety of reasons. He first described dogmatism and naive beliefs, which are subconscious intuitions that people cling to, to be the reason why many disbelieve science. He further explains that many are reliant on personal experience and anecdotes rather than hard facts and statistics to come to conclusions and that is why many disagree with scientific findings. Achenbach, in his article, also mentioned that, another reason for the disbelief of science is political where "disbelievers", claim that the purport of science, especially in the aspects of climate change, is a propaganda of climate activists and environmentalists who seek to employ the idea of global warming to attack the free market and industrial society. He also mentioned that the disbelief is science is caused the fact that,…
- 443 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Eventhough, science provided to our society enormous knowledge about the universe and the possibilities how to use matter and energy, which lead to the mass production of superhuman technology, science has not been always appreciated by the humans. Religious communities abused the scientific individuals and theories throughout the European modern history. Ideas, that are known to be fact nowadays, like heliocentrism, dissemination of the diseases by germs, or the shape of the Earth were rejected by the society, because of the massive power of the Church. Hence, the religious impact on the educational system in the 20th century, after the breakthroughs of Newton or Einstein, portrays the humanity as a stubborn, ignorant, and intolerant civilization. The fact, that there is a countless number of churches in the United States, but the budget for NASA decreases almost every year, proves that our society is not ready to get on a higher and more intelligent level. Therefore, I suggest that our society finally acknowledges the most famous quote from Nietzsche: “God is…
- 735 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Rabbi Jonathan Sacks’ The Great Partnership: Science, Religion and the Search for Meaning depicts Sacks’ understanding of the relationship between religion and science. In the first part of the book, Sacks’ differentiates between religion and science and discusses some of the reasons why people believe that science and religion are incompatible. The second part of Sacks’ book is primarily about the importance of religion and the effect on the world if religion was lost. The last and final part of his book goes over some of the major challenges that science and people pose to faith. The main thesis of Sacks’ book is that science and religion are two ways of thinking that are necessary and compatible with one another. According to Sacks’ science…
- 815 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Identify and briefly explain three reasons why statistics on religious belief may not be accurate. (9 marks) – June 2012…
- 1083 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the world's greatest scientists to have ever lived, Albert Einstein, won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921. Already famous and a household name, he wrote a letter replying to a sixth-grade student named Phyllis Wright in January of 1936. This context made Albert Einstein the speaker, Phyllis Wright the audience, and the question and the answer to it, the subject. She had originially asked him if scientists pray and if they do, what for. Einstein responded saying, that it is tough to pray for something science related when science is based on laws of nature. However he continues saying, not all of those laws are set in cement and that believing in their existence takes some what of a faith. Next he describes that many dedicated scientists believe that there is something bigger than human kind that is responsible for the laws of the universe; but that that religious thought is much different than that of a younger person's, like Phyllis herself.…
- 480 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Modern Scientific Picture: Scientists and educated men feel the Christian attitude towards the world and human existence is inappropriate. While science has both robbed us of any purpose that we had before, it has also furnished us with enormously greater power to achieve these purposes.…
- 277 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…
- 714 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In a scientific age, it is getting harder and harder to believe in god due to the frequent scientific discoveries but does that really change the thoughts and opinions of those who choose to believe in such a thing? This is a very hotly debated question as over 51 per cent of the population believe in God but there is evidence to suggest that a hundred years ago, a smaller number but a higher percentage of people believed in a God. So therefore why has the percentage gone down and is it reasonable for it to do so?…
- 1725 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Information on how these findings and publications relate to the commonly held beliefs of the day: These findings and publications relate to the commonly held beliefs of the day and proposed that science and religion should be considered two distinct fields whose authorities do not overlap. This proposal is still brought about today.…
- 822 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The public’s attitude towards science is something that is least talked about in our society. Even in schools, teaching students about how scientists communicate with the public is given the least importance. As a result, I think most people who are involved in science disciplines are not sure how to respond when they come across this question.…
- 479 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Normally, there are minimal conflicts between scientists and theologians. They usually work in different areas of interest. Theologians are rarely interested in the tensile strength of steel. Scientists -- at work, at least -- are rarely interested in the soul, salvation, Heaven or Hell. But there are shared areas where both scientists and theologians promote their own beliefs. Often, these beliefs are in conflict.…
- 4676 Words
- 19 Pages
Powerful Essays -
“Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…
- 506 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Michael Shermer, a science writer, the existence of God is not and cannot be proven by science. However, he also believes that the belief in God is not taken away by scientific evidence. Scientific proof, he says, even suggests that the belief in God is still strong despite a knowledge in science and the world around us. This is proven by the fact that about two out of every five scientist believe in God, even with a strong understanding of their field of study. Shermer believes that people and their belief in God are completely independent of what science says. To prove his theory, Shermer brings up the fact that although concepts such as ESP and spirits cannot be proven, it does not stop people from believing in them. He also briefly explains the theories of Mormons and Scientologists and how, notwithstanding the lack of scientific evidence supporting their ideas, the people of these communities still believe in their religion. However, although science does not disprove faith, Shermer suggests that…
- 550 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
* Not informing a collaborator of your intent to file a patent in order to make sure that you are the sole inventor…
- 1913 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays