When two texts that stem from the same universal themes but different contexts are compared we gain a sophisticated understanding of the values being presented. The time the text was created shapes the meaning, values and significance of the text and shapes the ways in which they are received. Scientific advancement and environmental concern are common themes evident in both texts that are presented differently due to the historical context in which they we created, ultimately strengthening the responders understanding of the meaning and values presented. Mary Shelley’s novel “Frankenstein” and Ridley Scott’s Film “Bladerunner - The Director’s Cut” both successfully address the repercussions of scientific progression without a consideration for its effect on society and the environment.…
Imagine life as we know it without science. This may be hard to do, considering that scientific technology is now a perpetual symbol of modern-day life. Everything we see, everything we touch, and everything we ingest—all conceived of scientific research. But how did it come to be this way? Was it not only centuries ago that science began to surpass the authority of the church? Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, natural philosophers, now known as scientists, founded a new world view on science, which was previously based on the Bible and classic philosophers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. Both people connected their natural studies directly to God and the Bible, creating ideas like a geocentric earth. With time and new ideas, scientists managed to develope methods for creating and discovering things in nature, and with enough resources and patronage, were able to answer asked and unasked questions. Science, however, was not supported by everyone, and had to face many challenges to achieve the power it maintains in today’s world. Due to the strong authority that politics, religion, and common social order controlled in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, science was subjectively held in the hands of those who could utilize it or reject it.…
The contexts in which the texts are composed have a strong influence over the worlds they depict. This is clearly resembled in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s noir film “Blade Runner.” The importance of the relationship between science and nature is demonstrated through the texts, as both explore the essence of what it means to be human although the texts were composed over a hundred years apart. The texts represent the potential danger of ambition and knowledge in respect to the advancements of technology and as a result we begin to witness the line between human and non-human become increasingly blurred. As a responder we are forced to ask the question what is the value of life?…
Science is the most important tool in the progression and maturation of society and its values. Both Mary Shelly and Ridley Scott create characters pushing the boundaries of scientific exploration and understanding and in doing so they reveal flaws and shortcomings in the upheld values of the time. The narratives of Frankenstein and Blade Runner are linked strongly to their context with important messages or warnings within them. At the time of Shelly’s writing the ‘Age of Enlightenment’ was coming to an end, after years of threatening nature with its unrelenting attitude toward scientific endeavour at any cost.…
This change in humanity is something Shelley questions extensively throughout her novel with Victor’s parallellism with society in the way he goes about his science ‘I was left with a Childs blindness added to a student’s thirst for knowledge’ this thirst for knowledge in victor was not accompanied by thought for the future it was the ‘childs blindness’ to go with his ‘ardent curiosity’ that created a ‘monster’. Frankenstein’s arrogance and ignorance is making a statement about humanity’s lust to be enlightened with ‘both eyes open, only to be blinded in one eye’ with the morals and ethics of our society lacking the support and discussion needed. tragic circumstance’s within Frankenstein are made to show what should have happened in the circumstances, which involves thinking of morals and…
Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ explores a deeper understanding of disruption through questioning the morality and consequences of creating human life. Written in 1818, Shelley both reflects and foresees the dangers scientific exploration could bring if it advanced too far. This period of scientific advancement (seen through Darwin and Galvini) is mimicked through her…
Mary Shelley’s 19th century gothic novel Frankenstein and Ridley Scott’s 1982 film Blade Runner both explore the fears relevant to their contexts. While these texts were composed in different time periods, a parallel that exists between these texts involves man’s testing the established moral and ideals of the time. Both texts deal with the possible ramifications of scientific advancement and the outcomes for society as a whole; this idea has proven to be a timeless concept. These texts convey cautionary messages regarding the moral consideration of the responsibilities of scientific endeavour, which are still relevant today. Each composer considers the implications of scientific progress in their contexts; Mary Shelley was strongly influenced by the ideals of Romanticism while also being exposed to the new theories of galvanism. Scott composed Blade Runner in a time of commercial enterprise and controversial experimentation, namely in-vitro fertilisation and cloning. The themes explored in these texts reflect the concerns of the time in which they were composed. Although both texts share concerns about the impact of science on morality, their representation of the possibilities of the inevitable societal change differ, emphasising that texts are shaped by context.…
| This is a cautionary tale warning about the threat to a diminished humanity posed by Science. Both Walton, the narrator and Frankenstein are challenging the frontiers of human knowledge and will suffer for it. Shelley parallels Walton's spatial explorations and Frankenstein's forays into unknown knowledge, as both men seek to “pioneer a new way,” to make progress beyond established limits. Science and too much rational learning can diminish our humanity. We should value our natural sensual humanity and reject the scientific notion that rational thought will lead us to a more humane society. If not, our humanity will become diminished.In both texts, humans lose control over their man made creations.…
Just as Frankenstein’s radical scientific thinking clashes with the Creature’s humanitarian beliefs, Guy Ortolano claims that both arguments have “opposing views on progress, history, and society.” Similar to how Charles Percy Snow, a Cambridge physicist, claims “material wealth as a benchmark of success” (McAllister 12), Frankenstein does not consider his studies worthy unless they produce viable wealth and fame among the scientific community. When his creation is not an apparent success, there is a clear shift in his narration, from self-entitlement to self-pity for his “infinite pains and cares” (Shelley…
The texts Frankenstein and Blade Runner are both exemplary examples of the dangers of unchecked application of science and technology. The text Frankenstein was written in the midst of a surge of scientific advancement. This was a time era where to have intelligence and knowledge was to have power. This caused pursuits of knowledge to be ceaseless, and people were constantly seeking more intelligence and power. Mary Shelley represented these dangers of the ceaseless pursuits of knowledge through using gothic literature as a means of presenting her criticism and warnings. Shelley uses gothic tropes throughout the creation of the ‘monster’. Frankenstein’s first reaction establishes the poignant and elegiac emotions that persist for the remainder of the text. The technique of the use of gothic tropes; “miserable monster”, “livid with the hue of death”, dismal and wet”, “black comfortless sky”, allows the idea of creation of a being to be overshadowed by a sense of…
Describe the scientific advances of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and their impact on society…
The ability for a scientist to create is powerful, and should be considered seriously, with a drive to create for the overall benefit for the public and not for business, fame, or own desire. From a young age Frankenstein took interest in re-animating life, even though his professors discouraged it, but his drive for re-animating life was supposedly to be for the good of the public because he wanted to be able to “ ...[discover] if [he] could banish disease from the frame and render man invulnerable to any but a violent death…”(26), but unfortunately Frankenstein was not able to understand the danger of the “astonishing power placed within [his] hands”(37), because he was also driven by the greed for “wealth” and “glory”, and ultimately abandons his creation because it turns out to be monstrous instead of “beautiful”. Moreover, in today’s society, scientists develop discoveries in a…
Modern science is definitely something to fear, and that is exactly why Mary Shelley was warning her readers. Frankenstein is just a huge example period about how scary modern science is, and why she was warning us. Mary Shelley makes references in Frankenstein from Milton’s Paradise and Garden of Eden. “So much has been done, exclaimed the soul of Frankenstein—more, far more, will I achieve; treading in the steps already marked, I will pioneer a new way, explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation.” The quote shows; especially the part where he says he will “explore unknown powers, and unfold to the world the deepest mysteries of creation”, a great example of how she is warning the readers about the perils of modern science. It states how exploring more with science will help him create more out of life. “The deepest mysteries of creations”, is something scary to even think about someone exploring.…
Dangerous implication of knowledge is illustrated in Frankenstein as the concept of pursuit for knowledge within the time of the industrial age, shining a spotlight on the ethical and religious implications of science. Victor Frankenstein serves to highlight the instability of man's desire for wisdom by his creation of the monster. The reason for his invention was because Frankenstein had an interest in science and wanted to take his intellect to the next stage. The craving for more understanding lead to what was his own destruction. The same moral applies to nuclear science. Through the discovery of nuclear fusion, the United States government now has access to nuclear power and submarines, along with nuclear weapons and many other developments; products that can bring our country to ruin.…
During the 17th and 18th centuries, women were often seen as the inferior of the two sexes. They were expected to be educated only in how to take care of the house, how to cook, how to raise a child, and other common jobs that were thought to be suitable for a woman. However, as the Scientific Revolution occurred, more and more women began to take interest in studying other things such as chemistry, astronomy, and medicine. The attitudes and reactions towards the participation of women in these fields of study during the 17th and 18th centuries were both positive and negative; some people were completely against it, some men supported it, and some women supported their sex by proving themselves in their respective fields of study; but, the road to acceptance for women was not one without struggles, sacrificing countless days and their health for the all the sake of science.…