Preview

Scientific Management vs Human Relations

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scientific Management vs Human Relations
Throughout history, there have been many different approaches of management theories. Some theories longer exist because they are no longer relevant in today’s environment, but some theories are still implemented like Scientific Management and Human Relations. Scientific management emphasizes on efficiency productivity by motivating workers with monetary rewards. Human relations emphasize on motivation of workers by both financial rewards and a range of social factors (e.g. praise, a sense of belonging, feelings of achievement and pride in one’s work).

Scientific management uses incentives to motivate workers. This idea comes from Henry Gantt who introduced the bonus system, which motivated workers to complete their daily tasks by rewarding them a handsome bonus on top of their basic pay. Scientific Management assumes the worker as a ‘Rational Economic Man’, who is motivated by nothing else but money. Employees were paid extra according to their level of output and paid bonuses for reaching targets. Human relations, on the other hand, focused also on the social welfare of the workers. Taking care of workers’ social welfare, needs, and health will increase the productivity, as Mayo saw the worker as a ‘Social Man’. That feeling of importance also meant workers were generally happier, which in turn enhanced their work output, as proven in Hawthorne study.

According to Taylor, scientific management uses stopwatch method to get standard time and standard output of work. Taylor measured the time taken to complete certain task and made it the standard time for every worker. All unnecessary movements would then be eliminated in order to achieve efficiency. This method would become the standard to be used for all jobs. Human relations, according to Mayo, believed that the importance of stable and social relationships in the work situation contributed towards productivity. It is important to improve the social interaction and relationship between the workers and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “While Mangers complain about lack of motivation in their workers, they might as well consider the possibility that the reward systems they’ve installed are paying off for the opposite”.…

    • 1536 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elton Mayo and Fritz Roethlisberger have conducted the Hawthorne studies focusing their research on the employees and the aspects that influenced the workers productivity (Baack, 2012). According to their findings, the productivity rates increased due to positive interactions between workers and researches, entry-level employees were actively fulfilling the duties of the supervisors without worrying about being disciplined for poor performance, and people started working closely in groups, while being loyal to one another (Baack, 2012). The research showed that workers are motivated not only by money, but also by social interactions, which should be accounted for at the workplace (Baack, 2012).…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As I read our text, I discovered that a thoroughly studying and testing different work, methods to identify the best, most efficient way to complete a job is considered Scientific Management. This approach studied the way in which workers performed in an attempt to make the organization run more efficient. Different tasks were broken down into small parts during this study and then each one was analyzed to see what was the best way of doing the task. While on the other hand, the human relations approach argues that people are emotional rather than economic-rational beings. This approach sees people more as just social systems rather than mechanical ones. The Human Relations Management focuses on the people as the major principle instead of the organization.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although it has revolutionised management theories, these methods were developed for the last century with different industry, social relations and global aims. Thus we can discuss if scientific management has or not relevance to the present day.…

    • 1805 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Motivation and Employees

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages

    It has been suggested that “financial rewards do not guarantee more productivity, but paying attention to employees’ motivational needs does” and that “managers need to pay less attention to financial incentives and more to the actual motivation needs of their employees” (Sunday Business Post 2012). This is further supported by the results of the 2011 Mercer’s What’s Working survey where “being treated with respect, a work-life balance, the type of work undertaken … were ranked ahead of overall compensation” (Sunday Business Post 2012).…

    • 2237 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Prison Management Styles

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Organizations and businesses alike all have managers and management styles that they abide by. Some may be company policy; while others seem to be implemented by the manager’s themselves. In this paper, three different management styles are explained; Scientific, human relations, and systems management styles. All have been used in different organizations, and some are still used today. In order for a business to effectively succeed in their goals, a certain management style needs to be used.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This research paper addressed and discussed the three types of management styles and its role within an organization. Specifically, these management styles are the scientific management, human relations management, and the systems management. Though the early styles, scientific management and human relations management were acceptable for the times in which they were developed. Neither was perfect. Hence, today both exist in modified forms. However, both…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scientific management is different from the human relations movement because the scientific management is focused on theorizing performance of a particular job. Human Relations is more focused on the individual who is doing the performance in a work setting. The Scientific management had a narrow view that only focused on daily task, organizational goals and the overall objective of an organization. This mostly included uniformity of a task. However, as the scientific management grew, the employee who was conducting the task started to become critical to the success of the work. Scientific method started utilizing human relations within developing its management objectives.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Third. To prove that the best management is a true science, resting upon clearly defined laws, rules, and principles, as a foundation. And further to show that the fundamental principles of scientific management are applicable to all kinds of human activities, from our simplest individual acts to the work of our great corporations, which call for the most elaborate cooperation. And, briefly, through a series of illustrations, to convince the reader that whenever these principles are correctly applied, results must follow which are truly astounding.…

    • 1141 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Organizations have evolved in many different ways throughout history. On one spectrum of the different theories that are to be examined is the Scientific Management theory, which has its roots in early forms of organizations and uses a theme that is based on efficiency. The other theory that will be used to compare and contrast with Scientific Management will be Systems theory. These two different perspectives are exactly that, different, however there may be certain types of organizations that would be more efficient using either of the theories as a backbone to the way their organization functions. My interest is based on the basic principles of these theories and the similarities and differences that arise within the core of what they represent. And the different work environments that these two theories are being used and why that may be.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Scientific Management’ is a managerial development theory that was proposed by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the 1880s. It was designed to apply scientific methods to the management of work organisations in order to improve economic efficiency and labour productivity. This theory is also well known as ‘Taylorism’ and has had a significant impact in the history of organisational management. Scientific management has had many benefits in the work organisation such as the division between workers and managers, increased efficiency in production and task specialisation. To some extent, this idea may still be relevant in some organisations but it is evident that the problems associated with this theory has led to the downfall of scientific management in today’s service economy and furthermore has allowed for the introduction of improved managerial methods. The issues and disadvantages of scientific management will be further discussed and explained why it is no longer considered relevant in our modern day service economy.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Management approach was initially described and theorized by Frederick Winslow Taylor in the in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. In his book “Principles of Scientific Management”, first published in 1911, Frederick Taylor formulated a view on management that was highly inspired by engineering principles.. Frederick Taylor developed Scientific Management out of the belief that tasks could be optimized scientifically, and that Scientific Management could design the best rational way of performing any task, which would lead to enhanced productivity and profitability. Enhanced productivity would not only lead to greater profits for the employers, but also for the workers, who would be given the tools and training to perform at optimum performance.(Wu, 2009) This theory was intended at studying the liaison between thephysical nature of the work and physiological nature of the workmen.It also stresses the importance of technical competency which will improve the organizations efficiency (Wu, 2009). Taylor’s four universal principles include: constructing a science for each element of the workers tasks; scientifically select, train, teach and develop the workers managers need to fully cooperate with the workers and the work shall be shared equally between managers and workers (Wu, 2009). According to Bell and Martin (2012), “it is important for managers to use Taylor’s scientific methods of determine the component tasks identified with a specific job and how long it takes to perform each component in order to know if the work load is balanced between all of the workers, or if the work needs to be reapportioned” ( p. 111).…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    There are so many fallacies for instance the term of ‘human relations’ and ‘human resources’ where the contemporary organisation unseen the differences between this two approaches. Both human relations and human resources manager might use the same kind of organisational behaviour but for very different reasons (Miller 2009). Human relations approach emphasize on productivity where the management advocates better on treatment of subordinates in belief that it will lead to greater productivity. According to Miller (2006), the human relation management pay little attention to the individual needs of employees, to nonfinancial rewards in the workplace, or to the prevalence of social interaction in organisations. On the other hand, human resource approach pays more attention on workers’ feeling where theorists recognise that individuals in organisation have feelings that must be considered and also acknowledge that individual labour is an important ingredient for meeting the organisational goal (Miller 2006). Some of the theoretical approaches that could be brought into discussion of the differences between human relations and human resources are from well-known scholars such as Elton Mayo, Abraham Maslow, Fredrick Herzberg, Rensis Likert as well as Robert Blake (Miller 2009).…

    • 4513 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One of the greatest properties of service within organisations are its human resources, also one of the most vital and necessary tasks of management is to motivate their staff in order to improve its performance and achieve corporate success. (Redman and Wilkinson 2001, Hersey and Blanchard 1993, Mabey and Salaman1995).…

    • 6814 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Furthermore, the essay also examines the reasons why scientific management is still popular amongst managers and also why some managers abhor the use of those principles - an evaluation of its pros and cons in today’s organisation.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics