Preview

Scott Rothstein - Money Laundering Synopsis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2060 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scott Rothstein - Money Laundering Synopsis
December 12

Scott
Rothstein

2013

In July of 2010, Scott Rothstein was sentenced to 50 years in prison for running a US$1.2 billion Ponzi scheme from his Florida law firm. DH Gatsby

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Money Laundering & Scott Rothstein
In July of 2010, Scott Rothstein was sentenced to 50 years in prison for running a US$1.2 billion
Ponzi scheme from his Florida law firm.
Rothstein had two types of schemes. He persuaded clients/investors to purchase hundreds of millions of dollars of structured settlements at a discounted price so that he could generate immediate revenue from false settlements. Through the use of his law firm he fabricated court orders, forging the signatures of federal court judges, that showed that his clients had been awarded large sums of money in lawsuits in an effort to promote his credibility and pocket book.
Clients were told that defendants had transferred funds to off shore accounts such as the Cayman
Islands. In order for Rothstein to recover the money, his clients had to post bonds worth millions of dollars with his firm. The offshore accounts were owned by Rothstein. Rothstein would used the acquired funds to live a lavish lifestyle (cash exchange for negotiable goods). The exchanges included such items as a 1967 Corvette convertible. a Ferrari F-40, a Ferrari F430 Spider, a
Mercedes SLR McLaren, a Bugatti Veyron, and a 2010 Lamborghini.
A fraudulent transaction follows certain trends. We will look at the methodology now.
Incentive


In this situation, Mr. Rothstein was living a lavish lifestyle. For him to afford such materialistic possessions he had to become innovative with acquiring more funds.

Opportunity
• Circumstances exist - in Mr. Rothstein 's case, he was a senior partner within his law firm. His reputation had been his strongest attribute. During his laundering time, Mr. Rothstein would offer exceptional gracious bonuses to him associates.
• Since he was a senior partner, many

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Bernard Madoff “Ponzi Scheme” scandal was the biggest and lasted the longest financial fraud in the history of the US. Bernard Madoff was a financial adviser, and also the former chairman of the NADAQ. He established his investment firm named “Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC” in 1960. The Madoff Fraud is a typical “Ponzi Scheme”, in order to attract investors to give money to him, he convinced people to hand over their life saving, and promised them high returns rate, and then he used these money to make payments to those earlier investors. He took the investors for a $65 billion over the course of nearly two decades. In the end, Bernard was sentenced to maximum 150 years prison life and a forfeiture of $170 billion.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    was making a lot of money. He donated five hundred thirty million dollars of the money…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Palko Case Summary

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages

    case, he was retried by the Supreme Court of Connecticut and as a result was charged…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    costa rica

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages

    chance for a new beginning and to use the money to help the world. They purchased 5,000 acres…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gave several speeches in order to get people on his side and raise money. He was doing all…

    • 5434 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the latter year, he sold the newspaper and devoted his time to the law. He demonstrated considerable legal prowess early and represented clients in courts at every level, including the United States Supreme Court, which he received permission to practice before in…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For example, in December of 2001, Martha Stewart sold over 3,000 shares of Imclone System Stocks to save her $45,000 on her ImClone stocks. She was convicted of conspiracy, false statement, and prejury changes. For this crime she was only sentenced to 10 months imprisonment, had to pay fines and penalties that exceeded $250,000, and was no longer allowed to be President of Martha Stewart Living Omni-media.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    so much riding on his shoulders and so much evidence that went against him. The courts and…

    • 831 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stanford Auditing Case

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Allen Stanford was, at one point, a successful entrepreneur whose investment company’s accounts totaled in the billions. The aforementioned keyword is ‘was.’ As CEO of Stanford Financial Group, Stanford essentially ran a massive Ponzi scheme; he issued certificates of deposit at an offshore bank that he controlled and illegally used the investors’ funds. These CD’s were appealing to investors due to their high returns of nearly twice the average rate of return of investments in U.S. banks. Investors were led to believe that these CD’s had such high returns because they were being invested in corporate stocks, real estate, hedge funds, and precious metals (BusinessWeek). The SEC eventually uncovered Stanford’s fraud in 2008. Stanford was recently convicted and sentenced to 110 years (NYTimes). In an attempt to recover some of the money from the corrupt management of the investments, the investors’ next step was to sue the auditors of Stanford Financial Group. BDO, the accounting firm that was responsible for auditing Stanford’s financial statements, is currently the target of a major lawsuit. BDO did not act in accordance with the responsibilities of an auditor and thus led to audit risk, lack of independence, and various violations of the PCAOB’s auditing standards regarding investment securities.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    advances on him. He put his word against two white people's, and now he is on trial for no…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    million dollars due to his numerous illegal endeavors. The 1920s would start a long battle with…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The millionaire moguls used their money to influence the political system and swindle the American public. They bought votes for politicians who would support their underhanded dealings and gave money to officials who would "look the other way" when the unethical businessmen broke laws. Bribery and corruption were commonplace in the business…

    • 2456 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A Summary Of Lobbying

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stephen Schwarzman has been able to amount such wealth over the years due to him and other executives is buy taking advantage of the economic system. During election season with campaigns costing tens of millions of dollars many senators and candidates turn to those executives who have the wealth to support them and in turn those financial supporters want something in return. What may be the most common method of getting a return for their money would be lobbying. Lobbying is the act of influencing public and government policy on all levels. Once the senators and the candidates are given their checks they are expected to do something in return for the supporter and most times it is by lobbying the government, more on the economic side, to benefit…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eliot Spitzer Case

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many criticized Spitzer for his overly aggressive indictments and actions against Wall Street firms, which consisted releasing the Merrill Lynch’s incriminating emails on the national television as well as releasing firms’ civil charges to public before the court ruled on the case. However, his rationale behind it was that many Wall Street firms have taken shelters under legal settlements – usually led by SEC or other government regulation agencies – that would withhold the scandalous details of their charges and only require firms to pay some fines. These firms’ reputations would remain intact and the public would not have any awareness of the “corrupt business models” that many of these firms have been practicing. That is why many firms continue to make fraudulent, deceitful deals that would rip off their clients, and drive up their profitability, knowing that the worst case scenario is them getting caught and having a pay some type of fine to settle the case.…

    • 1659 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Enron's CEO, Louis Borget, is also discovered to be diverting company money to offshore accounts.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays