Preview

Scottish Court Structure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1183 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Scottish Court Structure
The structure of the Scottish courts is split into two completely different areas: Criminal and Civil. Both deal with different types of cases and have different structures. “Whereas the criminal justice system is focused on sentences designed to act as a punishment or deterrent (such as a fine or a period of imprisonment), civil court proceedings are brought in order to obtain a specific legal remedy which can be enforced against the other party to the action.” (Harvie-Clark, 2014). The civil court is structured depending on the severity of the case at hand these are the Sheriff Court which deals with cases such as Domestic/family matters and contractual disputes. The Court of Session (which is further divided into the Inner House and Outer …show more content…
Sometimes a jury of 12 (compared to a jury of 15 that is usually found in criminal cases) will also hear cases. The outer House has several courts each presided over by a ‘Junior’ Lord of Session who is known as a Lord Ordinary who sit to hear cases at the first instance. Sometimes a jury of 12 (compared to a jury of 15 that is usually found in criminal cases) will also hear cases. Prospective litigants never used to have a say in which judge they would like to hear their case but now they can have some say which could be helpful if the Lord/Lady has expertise in the area that their case is on.

“The jurisdiction of the Outer House extends to all kinds of civil claims unless jurisdiction is expressly excluded by a statute.” (Shiels, 2003). Usually for court actions of more than £1500. It also practices Judicial Review and the 'Nobile Officium' (which provides the court with an equitable power that gives the case a remedy where justice is needed and where there are no other remedies from previous
…show more content…
The Lord President (the first senior judge and the head of the judiciary) presides over the First Division with three senior Lords of Session. The Lord Justice Clerk presides over the Second Division with three other judges. Normally three out of the four judges will sit in court as that is the minimum number of people required to make a judgement (known as a quorum). In special cases a “full Bench” of 7 judges may sit in court. An Extra Division may be assembled (by the Lord President and formed of judges that usually work in the Outer House) when there is more business than usual. Decisions on court actions are made when all personnel are in complete agreement or by the majority vote (the presiding judge will not get to cast a vote). In contrast to the Outer House the party does not have the right to pick which judges hear their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Unit 23

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages

    This court deals with mainly criminal cases but rarely civil cases. All criminal cases start off in the Magistrates’ Court and are heard by either lay magistrates or district judges. District judges are legally trained but lay magistrates are not, they do however have to be assisted by a legally trained clerk. Magistrate Courts will only hear cases that have happened in their area and can only administer punishment of up to £5,000 or 6 months imprisonment. If the crime requires more than what the magistrate can administer than the case will be passed on to the Crown Court. Jury can also move up the case to the Crown Court if the defendant asks for trial.…

    • 6999 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ky Court System Structure

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Next is the Court of Appeals with 14 judges. They take cases of limited writ application, misdemeanor, and criminal appeal by right cases that are under a 20 year sentence, civil and limited administrative agency. They also take care of appeal by permission cases.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When hearing a case in court both magistrates and judges have to be unbiased and have no prejudices. They both have to make sure that no party is treated unfairly. Not only that but both parties must have a good sense of judgement and must be able to make sound decisions.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament does not govern, but its role is to check or constrain the government of the day. Many therefore argue that parliament’s most important function is to ‘call the government to account’’, there by forcing the members to explain their actions and justify their policies. There are three groups within the UK parliament, the House of Commons, the House of Lords, and the Monarchy. The HoC consists of 646 MP’s and each MP is elected in a local constituency to gain a seat in parliament. The House of Lords consists of 721 peers, there are approximately 600 life peers where as there are only 92 hereditary peers. The Lords spiritual are the second smallest group of the Lords. They are bishops and archbishops of the Church of England, and now only 26 remain. Law lords are the final group to make up the House of Lords. There are only 12 of these, and they focus on judicial work, which is carried out through the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords. The final group that can hold the government to account is the monarchy. The monarch is often ignored as part of parliament, which is understandable as the Queen is normally entirely ceremonial and symbolic. As a non-executive head of state, the monarchy symbolizes the authority of the crown. Parliament holds the government to account by scrutinising and overseeing what the government does, and this is the key to ensure a responsible government.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Impulsive behaviour are some things individuals will do everyday which may have an effect on them for following few days or the remainder of their life. Impulsive behaviour will begin with atiny low action, and shortly lead to a large catastrophe. Whenever acting stupidly regarding the results, you're acting impetuously. several stories and plays have characters that act during this method and make the complete conflict of the story. a decent example of this can be the play lover and Juliet by Shakspere.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ss144 Unit 2 Essay

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The function of the County Court House is relatively the same to both the individual and society as a whole. The Court House ensures proper justice is served and all laws are abided by. For the individual this process can be very frustrating. Whether the person is there to pay a fine, dispute a charge against them or pursue civil action against another who has done wrong by them, the process can be very long and time consuming. For society the process is just as time consuming, however, is less likely to be as frustrating since a judge is more difficult to deal with on an individual basis than on a large public scale.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Each court is bound by the rulings of the courts above them; however, they are not bound by the rulings of other courts at the same level in the hierarchy. Provincial courts The first is the term "provincial court," which has…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    And since the House is a lot bigger then the senate, it also needs a greater number of formal rules to govern activity in the House, and it has limited debate. In the senate, they have fewer rules and restrictions, but they normally permit extended debate on all issues that arise before it. In the House, representatives generally achieve less prestige and less individual notice; in the senate, members achieve more prestige and more media attention, especially those who openly express presidential ambitions are better able to gain media exposure. The senate members also have the power to advise the president on, and to consent to, presidential appointments and treaties; the House representatives only has power to originates bills for raising revenues. Moreover, member in the senate are usually national leadership and have less party loyalty; and which the House members are local or narrow leadership and they tent to have more partisan.…

    • 524 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court Report

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The basic division in the structure of criminal courts is between the lower criminal courts – the local courts, Children’s court and Coroner’s court – and the higher criminal courts – the District Court and the Supreme Court. In observing proceedings at the Local, District and Supreme Courts over a period of three days a number of aspects of the criminal justice system were made apparent. The administration, processes and practices of the criminal trial are extremely varied dependent upon the level of criminal court being observed. The distinctions between the workings of the two courts revealed a number of the differences between summary proceedings and trial upon indictment. The cases observed served to provide evidence for the “two tiers of justice” argument. Also the role of the judiciary was perceived as being particularly interesting especially the high level of discretion that they held in the Local Courts and even to an extent in the District Court primarily when there was no jury present.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    III. Indian Labor (pp. 134 – 144) A. Colonial America’s export economy depended on forced labor, and Iberian settlers established various systems in order to mobilize indigenous populations to participate in the monetized colonial economy through compulsory labor and fiscal demands (pp. 134 – 135). B. The encomienda system allowed the Iberians to harness the labor power of the economically advanced indigenous societies that already existed, and to generally exploit the labor power of the indigenous peoples (pp. 135 – 138). 1.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Criminal Trial Process

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Each court has its own jurisdiction or area over which it has authority to hear matters. Minor matters such as summary offences are dealt with lower in the court hierarchy; the higher courts are reserved for more serious matters, indictable offences and appeals from the lower courts.…

    • 3916 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court could sometimes be influenced by royal officials like the monarchs. What you don’t see now days though, are the stocks, the punishment for a crime. You had to stand, hunched over, in the town square, and be ridiculed for your actions, humiliated all day. Another form of the judicial branch were the town meetings, or county meetings down South. A select group of officials could gather and discuss local issues, like paying for schools and ownership and use of unsettled lands.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jury Decision Making Essay

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The size of the jury varies. For example, in criminal cases, there are usually 12 jurors. However, in civil case trials, they may only require six jurors. Although in Scotland, there are 15. The majority for a verdict varies. In some cases it must be unambiguous,…

    • 1978 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Fashion Channel

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Decision to Be Made The management team for The Fashion Channel (TFC) must decide which customer segment(s) or “cluster” they should target in their new marketing strategy and how they should position TFC to ultimately increase company revenue. When deciding their marketing strategy, TFC must consider how they can increase their share of the market (ratings) versus the increasingly competitive fashion programming on CNN and Lifetime, and if they can maintain or increase TFC’s satisfaction level among the Large Multi-System Operators. According to Dana Wheeler, senior vice president of marketing for TFC, “the two key levers to drive revenue growth would be (1) increased viewership (ratings), and (2) increased advertising pricing.” Therefore, the scenario that The Fashion Channel will implement must increase TV ratings and advertising revenue. Relevant Facts Ratings One of the most important goals of The Fashion Channel’s new marketing plan was to improve their average rating compared to similar programming on CNN and Lifetime. According to Exhibit 1, TFC’s average rating was 1.0 (1.1 million households), while CNN and Lifetime enjoyed average ratings of 4.0 (4.4 million households) and 3.0 (3.3 million households) respectively. A major difference between The Fashion Channel and the other two networks is the time period of their programming. The main purpose of TFC is fashion and therefore programs around fashion 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. CNN and Lifetime, however, serve a larger purpose than fashion, and therefore only present programs dedicated to fashion Monday through Friday from 9-11pm (Lifetime) and Monday through Friday from 8-9pm and Saturday to Sunday from 10-11pm (CNN). Because they are not devoted to a specific niche, CNN and Lifetime have the opportunity to capture a larger audience that may have never looked for fashion programming if it…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics