Preview

Second Punic War Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
443 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Punic War Essay
To clearly understand the Second Punic War, a particular back story is required to fully comprehend what lead to the angst that the magnificent Carthaginian leader Hannibal had concerning Rome.
Hannibal was born the son of the powerful Carthaginian leader Hamilcar Barca, who took power soon after the First Punic War when tensions toward Rome were high. The fate of Carthage was laid upon Hannibal the day he was born. However, prior to his father passing away in 229 B.C. (Vengeance, 2016) that fate was sealed when his father made Hannibal promise to take down Rome. With his father’s dying wish and determination to pursue and conquer what he promised, Hannibal joined forces with that of unlikely barbarian allies and dredged on over the Alps in
…show more content…
However, this was not without a fight. The Carthaginian forces fought hard and obtained multiple victories throughout the course of the war. Including Ticinus, Trebia, Trasimene and most importantly their victory in 216 B.C. at Cannae, when they utilized ambush tactics to slaughter a Roman army more than twice their size. The battle at Cannae resulted in mass casualties for Rome and it is said that around seventy thousand Roman soldiers lost their lives in the Battle of Cannae (Morey, 1901), however, they were not shaken by this defeat. Instead they regrouped and became stronger under the new leadership of the great General Pubilus Cornelius Scipio. Under General Pubilus Cornelius Scipio the Roman army took Spain and proceeded on to Hannibal’s native city in Northern Africa. Continuing under Scipio the Romans lured Hannibal and the Carthaginians to their final battle of Zama and defeated them in North Africa, eventually taking over Italy. With the loss of Zama, the annihilation of around 20,000 Carthaginian men and imprisonment of many more, Hannibal and the Carthaginians surrendered putting an ending to the Second Punic War.
In conclusion, the outcome of the Second Punic War resulted with a victory by Rome and left a broken, battered and bruised Carthage. Furthermore, Rome obtained great power and reigned not only over land with its newly obtained territories,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    What seemed like what would be an easy Roman victory, turned into utter destruction. The night before the battle, Hannibal Barca, the Commander of the Carthaginians, formulated a plan to destroy the Romans. First, Hannibal would have the center of his army slowly fall back. After that, Hannibal would engage with the Roman flanks. On the day of the battle, the Romans boasted 80,000 ground troops and 6,000 cavalry, while the Carthaginians just had 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Furthermore, they most likely did not have the power or the military force to stop Hannibal had they wanted to do so. Moreover, should they choose to confront Hannibal, they most likely would lose all their economic gains in Spain after the First War. By fighting Rome, they were protecting their interests. A common misconception portrays Hannibal as the sole protagonist against the Romans, but the Carthaginian government also involved themselves in the conflict. Although they did not do as much as Hannibal during the war, the senate still helped in the war. Yet again, the Barcid faction triumphed over the impotent Hannonite…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal was born in 247 B.C. and from an earlier age, he was taught by his father, who was also a Carthaginian general, to hate the Romans. Hannibal, at the age of 26, attacked Sagunto Spain with the army he was given. This was the invasion that started the second Punic War. Hannibal took an army of over 100,00 men with him and 37 elephants with him over the Pyrenees and Alps. This long journey covered over 1,000 miles. Hannibal…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Punic Wars were three conflicts between Carthage and Rome. The first conflict was from 264-241 B.C. It grew out of an altercation between Messana and Syracuse. The Messanians asked Carthage for help and Syracuse asked Rome for help. The Strait of Messana, which separated the Italian Peninsula from Sicily, was important strategically, and both Carthage and Rome responded. The Punic army (Carthaginians) arrived in Sicily and mediated peace between the two and established a military base. When the Roman army arrived, they drove off the Punic army from the military base and war ensued (Columbia…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ceasar's Gallic Campaign

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Roman republic at the birth of Caesar (100BC) was a stagnant and decaying political structure that had outgrown the area it was set to govern. The Gallic War gave Caesar the staging point he needed to lay the ground work for the Roman Empire. Frank Herbert an American historian states “ The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent” Herbert’s comment concerning the causes of conflict can be considered accurate in relation to Caesar’s Gallic war because it provided Caesar and Rome with great wealth and in turn gave Caesar more influence. Detailed examination of What the Gallic war was, Why it occurred and the consequences of the war will prove that the Caesar’s Gallic war gave him the wealth and power needed to lay the foundation for the Roman Empire.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Carthaginian government make some valid points in their explanation of the blame for the Second Punic War Hannibal. Both they and Hannibal can be seen to share the responsibility for Carthage’s defeat in the Second Punic War. Hannibal’s quixotic plot to attack Rome without a veritable intention to destroy her left Carthage stranded in a war that would ultimately turn against her. However, the circumstances and misfortunes faced in a war on foreign soil against the might of Rome can at times be seen as beyond Hannibal’s control.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whereas Polybius feels this is the beginning of the war rather than an underlying cause. The Romans then prepared for war and sent out two main armies, one went to Sicily to invade Carthage under the command of the consul Sempronius Longus and the other was sent to Saguntum in the Iberian peninsula . They left only a small force in northern Italy just in case the Gauls took this as a chance to attack. What the Romans didn't expect Hannibal to do was to cross over the alps, because it was presumed impossible. Hannibal used this to his advantage and did exactly what the Romans thought to be impossible by cross the alps.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scipio Africanus Outline

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This act caused Hannibal to leave Italy and return to Africa to fight Scipio. In 202 BC…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eng 125 Final

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Welty, E. (1996). A Worn path. A Curtain of Green And Other Stories. New York: Doubleday.…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Barca was one of the greatest Generals of his time. Although his abilities at developing battle strategies were unequaled in his day, the driving forces behind his successes as a general, were not only his superior military ability, but also his feelings of hostility toward the Romans. Because of his ability to plan and organize military campaigns he was able to succeed in crossing thousands of troops across the Alps to invade Italy. Hannibal, son of General Hamilcar Barca, showed hostility toward the Romans due to the fact that he had been indoctrinated in the theology of the Carthaginian god Baal. This indoctrination along with the fact that Rome and Carthage were enemies only served to fuel his hostility and aggression.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He defeated the Carthaginians led by the legendary general, Hannibal at the northern city of Zama in Africa. By doing so, he ended the nearly 20 year old war. In this battle, the Romans were numerically deficient in infantry but where outnumbered in cavalry. After an extended skirmish between Rome and the Carthaginians, the light infantry and the mix of light infantry and war elephants deployed by Hannibal, and cause the man formations of the 2 sides to meet. Hannibal sends his army in echelon formation to envelop the roman flanks but ends up loosing the battle. The Battle of Zama was the last and decisive victory to the second Punic war. Zama was one of the three wars between Carthage and Rome and resulted in the destruction of Carthage and is annexed by Rome. A modern but similar battle to Zama was the Battle of Waterloo. Napoleon, another legendary general, led the French to battle against the English and their allies. Although Napoleon had a great reputation, Wellington, the general of the European side, proved to have more intelligence when he outsmarts Napoleon's plan and defeats the French. Both battles saw the final defeat of a famed and "invincible" military leader, Hannibal at Zama and Napoleon at Waterloo. Also, both battles were decisive battles in that they ultimately end the great wars. The Battle of Zama ended the 2nd Punic war and the Battle of Waterloo ended the Napoleonic wars. All in…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I, Gaius Terentius Varro was made commander for this battle at Cannae and have failed miserably, us Romans entered the battle outnumbering Hannibal’s army and his allies, but left leaving many murdered Roman men behind on the battlefield including my colleague Lucius Aemilius Paullus. The Carthaginian general, Hannibal has completely annihilated us. He has outsmarted us Romans. But alas, this was not my fault, we were not meant to win, there were too many aspects of this battle that were not in our favor, things I could not have controlled. It started from the beginning, Hannibal arrived to Cannae before us, giving himself the upper hand to set up his army and take advantage of the Aufidus River which was the main source of water closest to…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then for some years Carthage was the most successful who was commanded by Hamilcar. However, at the battle at the Aegates Islands in 241, the Carthaginians were beaten so badly that they requested peace. This agreement involved leaving Sicily and paying a huge tax. Rome now had complete control of Sicily.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Leonard Cottrell stated Hannibal had a sense of arrogance, as well as confidence, an example being when he attended “a lecture given by an academician named Phormio, on “the duties of army commanders.” after the lecture Antiochus asked Hannibal what he thought of it. “well” replied Hannibal… “I’ve listened to some old fools in my time, but this one beats them all.” Another example would be in a meeting with Scipio his antagonist who asked “Hannibal whom he esteemed the third greatest general. “Myself beyond doubt,” replied the Carthaginian. Scipio laughed and then asked, “what would you have said if you had conquered me?” “then” came the reply, “I would have placed Hannibal… before all other commanders.” It was the “memory of Hannibal [which] would endure, brilliant as a general… [as] the Historian Arnold Toynbee would say his searing course of conquest left an imprint still diescernible in Italy.” As Spray writes in the book Hannibal “we have the impression that [Hannibal] had admirers and faithful adherents rather than men who were personally close to him. His peers in Carthage were suspicious of him and were jealous of the power and fame of the Barca family.” Lastly the Romans viewed Hannibal “[as] the cause of great evil. They insisted that Hamical and his sons had consciously provoked a war.” With all the people of that time’s view on Hannibal in the eyes of those in the ancient world it’s in the book Hannibal which gives the best summary of who Hannibal was. As written by Spray “[Hannibal] was and rained Carthage’s loyal servant, no more and no less. That is how we read him from his actions: a great man unshakeable faithful to his native…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays