Preview

Section 3B Of The Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
236 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Section 3B Of The Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW)
by the state that the assault by the police officer was a negligent trespass and therefore exemplary and aggravated damages could not be awarded, was rejected. The Court found that it was clear that it was a case of intentional tort, but refrained from determining that if it had been a negligent trespass. In a view of that fact, a great caution must also be used in seeking to damages award.

There was also discussion of whether or not the injuries sustained by the plaintiff were personal injuries. Section 3B of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) will not apply to the calculation of personal injury damages for international torts. It means the tort legislation excludes “an intentional act that is done with intent to cause injury or death or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Plaintiff Robert Lopez flied a claim against Adelanto Stadium, Inc. claiming negligence on fault of Defendants insufficient design and/or installation of netting protection from foul balls under California Civil Code of Procedure §1714. Compl. ¶ 3. Also, Defendant’s negligence in failure to warn of dangers of foul balls. Compl ¶ 7. Mr. Lopez alleges that Adelanto Stadium, Inc. is liable on the sole grounds that they own the stadium in which Mr. Lopez suffered said injuries. Adelanto Stadium, Inc. moves to dismiss because Mr. Lopez’s claim fails as a matter of law, since it lacks sufficient factual matter to render a finding of negligence.…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: LexisNexis, (2012). Part a. intentional torts and privileges chapter 1 intentional interferences with persons or property. Retrieved from website: http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/torts/index.asp…

    • 847 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Harris sued H Robert Jones on the ground of intentional infliction of severe emotional distress. To analyze William’s claims, one must dissect the presented rule, starting with the definition of reckless. Reckless is defined as “involving a criminal degree of recklessness which causes injury to other persons or creates a risk of such injury.” In addition, extreme refers to “being so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency and to be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized society.” Thus, Jones must act extremely and recklessly, which was indubitably not the case.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages

    Patron brought negligence action against tavern in connection with injuries sustained when members of motorcycle gang attacked patron in men 's room. After jury returned $300,000 verdict for patron, the Superior Court, Law Division, Union County, granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) to tavern. Patron appealed, and tavern cross-appealed. The Superior Court, Appellate Division, PAYNE, J.A.D., held that: (1) tavern owed duty to patron to take reasonable…

    • 8217 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    * Must contribute positively to the well being of all citizens in society. Following features must be present:…

    • 4296 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    B law

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Due to the conflicting provisions in each Act, problems has create from the differences, anomalies and inconsistencies. In the second part, this assignment is going to Identify and discuss the differences, anomalies and inconsistencies between the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic) and other personal injury Acts within Victoria in respect to damages and the problems that arrive therein, especially the difference with personal injury damages.…

    • 1543 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Part A Introduction Under the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW), there have been various breaches of procedure. Police whilst in the process of executing an arrest and investigation as well as the matter of assault on Emilie’s behalf will detrimentally effect the progression and outcome of the case at hand. Breaches of Procedure Arrest The first encounter, outlined in the facts is, of police stopping Emilie’s vehicle on the presumption that she was driving under the influence of alcohol.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Law Case Study Essay

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This tort is classified as trespass to realty under four circumstances, one being when a person intentionally stays on the land of another when the owner tells him to depart (Kubasek, pg. 115). Analyzing the case it is clear that Chandler had asked the members to leave. However, the students did not obey which makes them have the possibility of being accused of trespass. Not only is a trespasser on someone’s personal property but, the trespasser is liable for damages she or he might cause as well (Kubasek, pg. 115). Since Steel and the other members used the properties book case and used it to break down Chandler’s door all of them are liable for the damages caused to both the door and the bookcase. Negligent torts involve failure to exercise reasonable care to protect another’s person or property (Kubasek, pg. 117). When comparing that definition to this case it is clear that negligence does not correspond with the elements of this case. In conclusion with the evidence involved it can be understood that Chandler had not control over this situation and had no way of knowing how to prevent this from…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Assault is an intentional tort in which there is offensive physical contact or an act that…

    • 1386 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nadel Et Al

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages

    4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of…

    • 1394 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Outline

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1) Introduction a) Definition – A tort is a civil wrong, other than breach of contract, for which the law provides a remedy. A person who breaches a tort duty (i.e., a duty to act in a manner that will not injure another person) has committed a tort and may be liable in a lawsuit brought by a person injured because of that tort. Torts is a fault-based system. b) Purposes of tort law: (1) to provide a peaceful means for adjusting the rights of parties who might otherwise “take the law into their own hands”; (2) to deter wrongful action; (3) to encourage socially responsible behavior; and, (4) to restore injured parties to their original condition, insofar as the law can do this, by compensating them for their injury. 2) Intentional Torts a) Assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. b) Intent i) Meaning of intent: There is no general meaning of “intent” when discussing intentional torts. For each individual tort, you have to memorize a different definition of “intent.” All that the intentional torts have in common is that D must have intended to bring about some sort of physical or mental effect upon another person. (1) No intent to harm: The intentional torts are generally not defined in such a way as to require D to have intended to harm the plaintiff. (Example: D points a water gun at P, making it seem like a robbery, when in fact it is a practical joke. If D has intended to put P in fear of imminent harmful bodily contact, the intent for assault…

    • 9959 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence and assume the risk of particular accident?…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australian Criminal Law

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The codification of the Criminal Code has marked a watershed on Australian legal jurisprudence. In this essay I will discuss the problems that may occur when interpreting the Criminal Code (The Code), the creation of uniformity and the also accessibility that the Code creates.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays