TABLE OF CASES
1. Amar Singh v. State, AIR 1968 Raj. 11.
1. Baburao Vithal Survade v. State of Gujarat, 1972 Cr. L.J. 1574.
1. Bedford v. R., [1988] A.C. 130.
1. Bishan Singh v. Emperor, AIR 1929 Lah. 443.
1. Chhagan v. State, AIR 1954 Sau. 34.
1. Deo Narain v. State of U.P., (1973) 1 SCC 347.
1. Emperor v. Ashrafuddin, 1942 Cri. L.J. 450.
1. Fisher, [1987] Crim. L.R. 334 (CA).
1. Ghansham Dass v. State (Delhi Admin.), AIR 1979 SC 44.
1. Gurbachan Singh v. State of Haryana, AIR 1974 SC 496.
1. Hari Meghji v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1983 SC 488.
1. In re Erasi Subba Reddi, AIR 1943 Mad. 492.
1. Jackson, [1984] Crim. L.R. 674.
1. Jai Dev v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 612.
1. Julien,[1969] 2 All E.R. 856.
1. Jumman v. State of Punjab, AIR 1957 SC 469.
1. Jurha Chamar v. Surit Ram, 7 Cri L.J. 49.
1. Karamat Husain v. Emperor, AIR 1938 Lah. 269.
1. Keso Sahu v. Saligram, 1977 Cri.LJ 1725.
1. Kishan v. The State, AIR 1974 SC 244.
1. Kripa Ram v. Emperor, 1947 Cri.L.J. 503.
1. Ladha Gova v. State, AIR 1951 Sau 1.
1. Mir Dad v. The Crown, ILR 7 Lahore 21.
1. Mohd. Khan v. State of M.P, 1972 Cri.L.J.661.
1. Mohd. M.S. Hameed v. State of Kerala, AIR 1980 SC 108.
1. Mohd. Rafi v. Emperor, AIR 1947 Lah. 375.
1. Mukhtiar Singh and anr. v. State of Punjab, 1975 Cri.L.J. 132.
1. Mukhtiar Singh v. State, 1971 Cri. L.J. 1049.
1. Munney Khan v. State of M.P., AIR 1971 SC 1491.
1. Munshi Ram v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1968 SC 702.
1. Nanhu Khan v. State of Bihar, AIR 1971 SC 2143.
1. Nga Chit Tin v. The King, 1939 Cri. L.J. 725.
1. Palmer v. The Queen, [1971] 1 All E.R. 1077 (PC).
1. Panjab Rao v. Emperor, 1946 Cri. L.J. 111.
1. Paras Ram v. Rex, AIR 1949 All. 274.
1. R. v. Fraser(1980), 55 C.C.C.(2d) 503.
1. Ram Lal Singh v. Emperor, 22 W.R. (Cr.) 51.
1. Ramesh v. State, AIR 1969 Tripura 53.
1. Ramzani v. State, AIR 1925 All. 319.
1. Ranjit Singh v. State, AIR 1957 Punj. 306.
1. Smt. Sandhya Rani Bardhan v.
Bibliography: Gaur, K.D., Criminal Law Cases and Materials (2nd ed.) (Bombay, 1985). Hall, Jerome, General Principles of Criminal Law (Indianopolis, 1947). Huda, Shamsul, Principles of the Law of Crimes (Lucknow, 1982). Jefferson, Michael, Criminal Law (London, 1992). Mackenzie, Lord, Studies in Roman Law (London, 1898). Moreland, Roy, The Law of Homicide (Indianapolis, 1952). Perkins, Rollin M., Criminal Law (New York, 1969). Turner, J.W. Cecil, Kenny’s Outlines of Criminal Law (19th ed.) (London, 1980). Williams, Glanville, Text Book of Criminal Law (London, 1978). Yadav, R.D. , Law of Crime and Self-Defence (New Delhi, 1993). Ames, James Bar, “Law and Morals”, Harv. L. Rev., Vol. 22, (1908), p. 98. Beale, Joseph,“Retreat from a murderous assault’, Harv. L. Rev., Vol. 16, (1902), p. 573. Lowery, Jack, “A Statutory study of self-defence and defence of others as an excuse for homicide”, University of Florida Law Review, Vol. V (1952), p. 58. Mahoney, Richard, “The Presumption of Innocence-A New Era”, Canadian Bar Review, Vol. 67, (1988) p. 1. March, Jenifer, “Women’s self-defence under Washington Law”, Washington Law Review, Vol Robinson, Paul, “A Functional Analysis of Criminal Law”, Northwestern Unversity Law Review, Vol. 88, No. 3, (1994), p. 857. Robinson, Paul, “Criminal Law Defences: A Systematic Analysis”, Columbia Law Review, Vol. 82, (1982), p. 199. Sornarajan, M., “Excessive Self-Defence in Commonwealth Law”, (1972) I.C.L.Q. 758. OTHER SOURCES Chambers 20th Century Dictionary (1972). Law Lexicon (1971), Vol. II. The Model Penal Code, (USA, 1962). The Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford, 1961).