1. My first contention is that stand your ground law says that a person can use self-defense when there is a reasonable threat, without an option to retreat. What we must look at here is that reasonable is not clearly defined. Some people might think that a person with a plastic knife is reasonable. According to Thomas Hobbes, states are always right. How this applies to this is that the government will be able to define the word reasonable. So I believe that if a person should not be able to decide if it is reasonable enough.
2. My second contention is that the state and the individual should work together, and not do things alone. According to philosopher Sandel, society flourishes if the individual and the state work together. This idea works along with Hobbes idea that a person only has a right to life and the government would protect that life. An example of this is when an individual sees an attacker and feels as if his life is in danger. He should run away and call the police which is basically the government. In this case, Hobbes’s and Sandel’s ideas work together. When the person calls the government he is leaving the protection to the government as well as work with the government by notifying the police.
3. My last contingent is that people applying stand your ground laws increases death. According to CBS Miami, deaths have tripled since the “Stand your ground” law has been passed. Before “Stand your ground” law, Florida averaged 12 “justifiable deaths” a year from 2000-2004. After “Stand your ground” law was passed in 2005, the number of “justifiable deaths” has nearly tripled to an average of 35 deaths per year. Another study on democracynow shows that 7.4 additional people are killed each month as a result of the “Stand your ground law” if people left the government to decide with the problem there would probably be fewer deaths. And because of all these reasons you should vote for con.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
A person's right to self defense begins at the moment the person reasonably believes that he or she is facing deadly force and reasonably…
- 218 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
I believe that Castle Doctrine is a double edge sword because it gives home owner way to protect their property but we that said in the case of Trayvon Martin who was shot and killed by a neighborhood watch should have never happen the kid was not a treat to any property at the time of the murder. I do believe that if someone is in your house and it becomes apparent that they will hurt you and your family you have the right to protect your house but if the person is walking away from your property and away from you it should be illegal to shoot and killed the person. If a person is running away from you it is not self-defense if you shoot someone in the back is not self-defense.…
- 134 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
If reasonable force us used against an individual and there is a threat of imminent bodily harm or death, and the individual defends themselves, that person may be acquitted of first-degree murder. To argue perfect self-defense, and…
- 371 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
She states that another beneficial aspect of freedom is our “effective government” and speaker one argues that government is the reason he is safe and sound because if there was no superior power to make and enforce rules, everything would crumble. The best type of government is that which meddles the least amount possible in its people’s lives (Lappe, 510). According to the speaker, the people believe government needs to be minimized to an extent. Everyone assumes so much from the government, and then complain when they think there’s too much power over us argues speaker one. Government shouldn’t intervene with a person’s choices and if it does, it is taking our freedom away (“Freedom From and Freedom To”). Speaker one claims although this superior law is there to protect us, it cannot stop all forms of detriment. There has to be a boundary on how much government is allowed to take over, which means “less responsibilities” (“Lappe, 511) In order for the nation to be ultimately free, the people need to stop relying on government to take on so much responsibility claims speaker one.…
- 328 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Governor Jeb Bush signed Florida’s Stand Your Ground Bill SB436 into law in 2005 with lobbyist Marison Hammer. According to Deadly Force and the Right of Self-Defense, the Stand Your Ground law gives “a person who is not engaged in…
- 2370 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
In today’s world there are many disputes about the old and some new changes to the “Stand Your Ground” laws. Some believe that these laws are crazy and that a society like ours should not need them and that if you shot someone outside your home that it is a crime and need to be sentenced to prison some other form of punishment. And then there are those who believe that the changes have brought a better more positive side to the community and that the laws should be engorged.…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Since 2005, other states have adopted a Florida style self-defense law that has been known to overlap and fall into three distinct categories, Stand Your Ground, Castle Doctrine or Duty to Retreat. These laws contain provisions that expand upon previous laws to provide additional protection to citizens who used guns or other means of force outside of their home as well as inside the home so long as there is reason to believe that you were in danger. Many people believe that these laws have just appeared out of nowhere or due to the Trayvon Martin case, but in actuality, they have been in the works for quite some time. Take for example the carrying concealed weapons law. The National…
- 548 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
- Court approval of common law rule that a person 'may repel force by force' in selfdefense and concluded that when attacked a person 's as entitled to stand his ground and meet any attack made upon him with a deadly weapon, in such a way and with such force' as needed to prevent 'great bodily injury or death's'.…
- 336 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The extent to which the Second Amendment applies and the particular laws that go hand in hand with it have long been contested by Americans. One of the more recent debates regarding it involves the Stand Your Ground laws. These laws outline that citizens have “No duty to retreat from the situation before resorting to deadly force; not limited to your property (home, office, etc.)” (“States That Have” Par. 3). These laws have been fiercely contested primarily due to the incident involving George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin in the February of 2012. People are often very stubborn regarding such issues, however, in her article “There is No Need to Change Stand Your Ground Laws” (published November 13, 2012 in the Palm Beach Post), Dara Kam uses her experience covering political issues along with a very straight forward…
- 1208 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
“The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only object of good government,” Thomas Jefferson once said. The government is a precarious, but influential, part in the world today. Many believe that everything the government does should be implemented in order to keep structure in our daily lives. However, bureaucracy is not always right. The government can often prove it can not be credible, plausible, or dependable. For as long as democracy has been in place, people have disagreed with it. Yet, if it were not for these disputes, government would never be anything that it is today. It is appropriate to go against the government if there is a conscience-challenged problem that can be solved civilly.…
- 1106 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
In the United States, stand-your-ground law states that an individual has no duty to retreat from any place they have lawful right to be and may use any level of force, including lethal, if they reasonably believe they face an imminent and immediate threat of serious bodily harm or death. Anyone that’s being violated or assaulted against their will and is threatened for their life can use this law. In order to present a case in court one must you have to be able to present a strong case and have evidence to defend yourself. Not all states use or possess this law, but there are a lot that do. Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia are all the states that have the law in their state. There are a lot of states that use the law, but Florida has recently had the most problems occur with this law. Between the Trayvon Martin trial and Jordan Davis trial both instances where “stand your ground” took place.…
- 1178 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
Self-defense laws, also known as “stand your ground laws”, have been a significant aspect of many court cases. However, like most other laws, these laws can be used improperly and cause excess controversy around a case. Joe Palazzolo and Rob Barry’s article titled “More Killings Called Self-Defense” from the March 31st edition of Wall Street Journal brings attention to these self-defense laws. The case discussed in the article is an example of self-defense laws causing controversy, as many protestors believe these laws were used improperly. This is also a common issue as the number of justifiable homicides seems to be on the rise. Are these “stand your ground laws” truly being abused? This is the main issue causing the debate surrounding cases around the country.…
- 1073 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
According to research done by Mark Hoekstra, an economist with Texas A&M University who has thoroughly examined “stand your ground” laws, there are a total of about 14,000 homicides taking place annually in the United States (11). A homicide, in this case, refers to one person unlawfully killing another. That is a fairly high number and it didn’t used to be that high. It has risen significantly since “stand your ground” laws have been implemented into 22 states across the United States. These laws give people the right to use deadly force in a situation in which they feel threatened no matter where they are as long as they have a legal right to be there (Mayors 1). These laws were put into place to benefit our society, but it can be proven that they have not been successfully benefitting our society as a whole because while they do give people the peace of mind that they have the right to protect themselves without fearing the consequences they may have before had to face afterwards, they have also resulted in many more deaths that before that could have been avoided if the person sensing danger had first tried to somehow escape the situation they were in before resorting to violence.…
- 1574 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
As humans, the easiest way you can spend time is by entertain yourself. At one point of our lives, we managed to do something stupid because of that urge.…
- 296 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I think thats a fairly accurate way to describe human nature. We as humans are designed to be like any other species: we have to take care of ourselves. Without this self preservation deep rooted in a species they die out. when it comes down to it, our actions always benefit us and whether we like it or not, we only do things that we either know consciously or subconsciously benefit us and anything else that happens is an after effect. We turn to take actions as to ensure our survival this was of reasoning of self preservation was demonstrated in this story the when the chief intentionally created roadblocks after roadblocks. I think this was don out of fear of being replace of David surpasing him in rank since he believed "he only…
- 155 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays