Preview

Sense And Sensibility Analysis

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1468 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sense And Sensibility Analysis
Sense vs. Sensibility Making choices is fundamental to our lives. When we are making decisions, the biggest paradox may be the conflict between the sense and the sensibility. It has been over two hundred years since Jane Austen wrote the novel Sense and Sensibility, yet to our surprise nothing has really changed. We still struggle to make the moral and ethical choices that people have struggled with over the years. In “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, Martin Luther King Jr. broke unjust laws and engaged in nonviolence direct action in order to gain equality and freedom. In “Dog Lab”, Claire McCarthy wanted to take advantage of the dog lab for further learning, but she was reluctant to attend the lab because killing a dog was inhumane and against …show more content…
McCarthy did not like the idea of doing the dog lab because she found it unethical to use dogs as the experimental subject. She could have learned the material in other ways. For example, many other animals that were similar to humans could be used for experimentation. Despite her emotional struggle, she made up her mind to participate in the lab and help anesthetize the dogs. After doing the lab, she felt regretful for her decision. She stressed her sadness and grief, “I was disappointed in the lab and disappointed in myself for doing it. I know now that doing the lab was wrong. Maybe not wrong for everyone—it was clearly a complicated and individual choice—but wrong for me.”(McCarthy, p484) Though dogs are being killed humanely, it’s unacceptable to kill innocent animals in order to gain knowledge especially because she unconsciously attached more emotion to dogs. The fondness she has for dogs makes her change her position. She wishes she could be the person she was before and make decisions without worrying about what a doctor would do. Similarly, King felt discontent and dissatisfied with the segregation and unjust laws when making an ethical decision. He revealed the unfair treatment that the colored suffered, “When you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brother at …show more content…
King had tried to stand between two forces, “One is a force of complacency, made up in part of Negro community who, as a result of long years of oppression, are so drained of self-respect and a sense of ‘somebodiness’ that they have adjusted to segregation. The other force is one of the bitterness and hatred, and it comes perilously close to advocating violence.”(King, p472) He conveyed that what he decided to emulate was neither the “do-nothingism” of the complacent nor the hatred and despair of the black nationalist. Based on his willingness to compromise his sense and sensibility, the nonviolent direct action was an excellent way to create a situation which would inevitably open the door to negotiation. The use of compromise is not only a solution to resolving disagreements in negotiation, but also an effective method for settling the conflict between sense and sensibility in everyday life. McCarthy also used the compromise and made up her mind to do the lab, but she would go help anesthetize the dogs first, because helping with the anesthesia, she thought, would be taking full responsibility for what she was doing, something that was very important to her. To make a decision, we must understand the consequences of acting or not acting. And, perhaps most important, we must learn to take responsibility for our decisions. Though McCarthy felt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    King’s use of rhetorical tools helps him convince the clergymen to take a second look at how African Americans are being treated. King utilizes emotive language to target his audience’s emotions. For example, he states, “if you would watch them push and curse old Negro women and young Negro” (3). He then goes on to give more examples, including, “I don’t believe you would have so warmly commended the police force if you had seen its angry and violent dogs literally biting six unarmed, nonviolent Negroes” (3). These help achieve his purpose because they are specific examples that make the clergymen feel guilty. Next, King utilizes questioning to make the clergymen reevaluate what they are doing. He says, “In this sense they have been rather publicly ‘nonviolent.’ But for what purpose? To preserve the evil system of segregation” (4).…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King’s leadership resulted in one of the the greatest non-violent mass protests in the history of the western world. King represented a sense of hope and promise to the followers of the Civil Rights Movement. The most important aspect to understand in this debate is King’s non-violence. With many other African-American leaders, such as Malcolm X, taking a more aggressive, violent approach to change, King saw the potential in Ghandi’s peaceful protests. As Fairclough writes, “Few blacks believed that the city’s businessmen would have accepted desegregation but for the double pressure of the demonstrations and the economic boycott of downtown stores” (209). The only effective events in the Civil Rights movements were those that followed King’s system of non-violence. While Carson argues that rather than King’s presence, “the success of the black movement required the mobilization of black communities…”(219), this assertion is made under the assumption that a non-violent leader would organize the masses. Without King’s leadership, there may have been an violent uprising that only led to more tensions between the…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King used ethos and pathos. Ethos means appeal to authority. In Dr. King’s letter, he stated the reason for the nonviolence protest after they had waited for more than three hundred and forty years for their constitutional and God giving rights. Dr. King also stated, “The purpose of our direct-action program is to create a situation so crisis-packed that it will inevitably open the door to negotiation”. After Black Americans waited for years and years without any favorable law and conditions, which will at least be, just, they had to protect because as the saying goes if persuasion fails force is applied, they needed to do sometime in order for the authorities to do something and see their seriousness. Even though black American knew the law would not be in their favor, they wanted the lawmakers and the authorities to negotiate with them for a suitable law, which will be just. Nevertheless, pathos, which means appeal to emotions. Black Americans were tired of waiting, bad thing were happening to their family and hardly answered when being asked by their children” Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?, when colored people first name becomes ‘nigger,’ their middle name becomes ‘boy’ however old they were”, they felt they were forever fighting a degenerating sense of “nobodiness”. Black Americans felt they were being avoided which was true and they hope something will be done about…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King said that before anyone takes direct action, the protester first needs to “purify” (567) their soul so that he or she will have no regrets going forward. Taking direct action is the right path but, it needs to be understood that there will be consequences for those actions. Taking a stand has never been easy and can be extremely difficult, but for the future progress of the African American, it was necessary. The protester needed to possess a firm moral conviction that their cause was a righteous and just cause. By combining nonviolent resistance, direct action, and a firm conviction of their cause, King was confident that the oppressors would come to join him in the quest for equality. All other issues would fade away and the only thing left to see would be the true issue, a "good versus evil"…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Furthermore, King states “the white power structure of this city left the negro community with no other alternative” by preaching patience and valuing “order” over “justice,” moderates have ensured the continuation of segregation. King’s disappointed that the white moderate’s do not realize that the black man causes tension, in order to reveal society’s underlying tension by taking direct action against injustice. King warns that moderates will one day feel remorse for having settled with “silence” instead of taking action against the injustice that the black community had…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kings starts with an idea that there are four basic steps to a nonviolent campaign. “Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist, negotiation, self purification, and direct action (King).” He does a great job in this essay pointing out the problems and determining that injustice very much does exist. King states, while in a jail cell, that the very reason he is…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The reader sees constant development of ideas introduced by the author which, reduces the impact of the overall stance. For instance, too much emphasis is put in determining the nature of just and unjust laws (4), (5). Along with the content of the paragraphs lacking consistency, the links between the paragraphs themselves seem unsystematic. This is shown in between the paragraphs referring to ‘White moderates devoted to order than to justice’ (6) and King being optimistic about help from the White moderates but only a few supported him in his cause(8). Though both serve as examples of White moderates not being supportive of about parity across United States, which inevitably resulted in disgust among the Negroes; King has not included that these are all examples of the same phenomenon. He has assumed the reader would draw the link themselves. The disunity among the paragraphs acts as a major flaw in the letter. The reader’s attention is lost as the evidences provided by King are either too wordy or it just takes the reader’s thoughtfulness away for the main purpose. For instance, the numerous examples used by King to describe the massive torture the African Americans had to face is also too prolix and unnecessary. The reader notices that King has employed extreme use of pathos which seems rather pointless…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King's Error". The article non effectively dispute that "civil rights and war do not mix". Mr. King states that it does mix because "America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic suction tube". King feels as if all our money is going to waste over a war when we should be fixing the problems in the country we live in. The article also non effectively dispute that Martin King used language that was too "antagonizing". The newspaper stated " ... Dr. King can only antagonize opinions in this country instead of winning recruits to the peace movement by recklessly comparing American military methods to those of the Nazis testing 'new medicine and new tortures in the concentration camps in Europe'. The facts are harsh, but they do not justify such slander". Mr. King had to use "antagonizing opinions" to actually grasp the people of the church's (the setting where the speech was presented) attention as well as to get his point across. The reaction from the audience would not have been as effective to the emotions if he had used unantagonizing…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King uses logic and evidence to convince the reader about his reason for engaging in the nonviolent campaign. In the beginning, he explains that he is in Birmingham because injustice is prevalent, and that local affiliates had invited him to participate in the nonviolent action. Additionally, he made a promise and when the hour came, he fulfilled that promise. Dr. King is a man of God, and a man of God does not break a promise, especially when one is in need. Dr. King goes on to explain that it is unfortunate that current white power structure has left the African-American community with only one available course of action. He states that, "Nonviolent direct action seeks to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue"(301). Simply put, the African-American community would like to confront the issue with negotiations, but the white moderate is unwilling, and the most effective way to force a community to confront an issue is with a nonviolent direct action. Additionally, Dr. King goes on to state, "Lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily"(301). Moreover, Dr. King expresses that Birmingham is one of the most thoroughly segregated cities in the United States. Also, it has a readily known ugly record of brutality. This simply strengthens his argument on the reason for their campaign in Birmingham, and brings in evidence that many people in the country know of the segregation that is so prevalent there. Dr. King backs up the logical course of action that was taken by bringing in evidence to the reader, especially the eight clergymen, showing that they are simply lacking knowledge of what truly is going on in Birmingham, and they misunderstood the true intentions for the nonviolent…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book Of Mice and Men has a major theme put in the story which is the “American Dream”. Although everyone’s dream dies with Curley’s wife in the end. Lennie, George, Candy, and Crooks had a dream set together, and when George has to kill Lennie that dream died with him and all of the men sunk more into the depressions hold (they became depressed). The characters talked about all have something in common, they contain a lack of confidence from something they cannot change. These characters feel that this external limitation of theirs will keep them from surviving the depression.…

    • 773 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Although Elinor knew before that Edward and Lucy would probably be married, she was still very hurt by the news. This entire secrete marriage seemed somewhat odd to me, as a reader, because Jane Austen doesn’t foreshadow this event in the text. Robert Ferrars and Lucy Steele hardly seem to know each other. It seems to me that Jane Austen just placed this relationship into the plot instead of letting it naturally develop throughout the book.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Of Mice and Men is a novel about two men and their struggle to reach their dreams of owning their own ranch. George Milton and Lennie Small are best friends, who despite of all their extremely difference personalities, but still manage to work together, travel together and get rid of anything that gets in their way. The friendship between George and Lennie is prevalent throughout the book, but it is shown most explicitly in their plan to live on a farm together in the future. The way in which this dream is articulated to represent the idealized friendship they share. The author Steinbeck uses nearly all of the characters in this novel to express the importance of having a real and true friendship. 
However, a large part in the novel Of Mice and Men expresses the loneliness suffered by many of the characters and their longing for companionship. Each of these characters searches for friends who truly care about each other throughout the story. The main theme that the author attempts to convey through various dialogues between characters is basically the brother kind of love between Lennie and George: the theme of an idealized male friendship.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    King evaluates the difference between just laws and unjust laws to justify his actions in Birmingham. Understanding the difference between the laws, King believes that he is subject to breaking laws as long as they are unjust. King, also, emphasizes that his cause for breaking the law is in favor of equality for all people. First, he defines what a law is in his own words. He makes a clear distinction between the different categories of laws many times. He, then, differentiate that there are just laws and unjust laws. King’s definition of a just law is “any law that uplifts human personality is just” (PAR 12). Meanwhile, the definition provided for unjust laws is “any law that degrades human personality” (PAR 12). King addresses that just and unjust laws target the personalities of the segregated and segregator. The problem with segregation is that “it gives the segregator a false sense of superiority, and the segregated a false sense of inferiority” (PAR 12). The difference in personalities leads people to believe they are better than others. It breaks the constitutional perception that “all men are created equal”. King believes “a just law is a code that a majority compels a minority to follow that it is willing to follow…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    made was that the “means to an end must be as pure as the end itself.” What he meant by this was that the process of obtaining an objective, must be as pure and peaceful as the outcome of the objective itself. Martin Luther King Jr. was fighting for peace and equality in a time of racism and segregation. Colored people were treated as inferiors to white people; they were not allowed to live at the same standard as white people. Their children were not allowed to attend white schools and colored people were seated at the back of buses, whilst white people sat at the front. Colored people were also killed, their houses were burned down and it was the time period when the Klu Klux Klan were hanging colored people from trees. By saying that the means to an end must be as pure as the end itself, Martin Luther King Jr. meant that if the colored people went out and retaliated by killing white people, then their freedom would be neither peaceful, nor pure. He was a man of great integrity and I believe he was referring to non-violent activities and nonviolent protests, in an attempt to strike the hearts of white people. I think that by sticking to peace and by not retaliating, Martin Luther King Jr. demonstrated an immense amount of integrity and this is probably one of the main reasons that he is the role model that he is today. Peace and fighting fairly are not always effective ways of handling oppression, although they are the most respectful and ethical ways to handle it. A leader who handles situations in this matter must have great character, must be very patient and forgiving, and sadly a lot of leaders nowadays don’t have any of these characteristics, which is why wars nowadays are so…

    • 1618 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his book, Common Sense, Thomas Paine provides a very clear objective: to persuade American colonists to fight against the British Empire and become an independent nation. He begins on this pre-revolutionary pamphlet with general comments about the current state of the government and that people have a strong habit of confusing government with society. Paine clearly argues that society is always something to strive for, whereas government is a “necessary evil.” As Paine had hoped, Common Sense was one of the most significant factors in turning American opinion against Britain and ultimately enabled them to engage in what is now known as the American Revolution.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays