Preview

Sensoret III Vs Khafre Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
389 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sensoret III Vs Khafre Analysis
The comparison between the Head of Senusret III and Khafre is that they both ruled Egypt. Both sculptures where found in temple where their tombs were located. Also, their sculptures were use as The differences between the Head of Senusret III and Khafre is that they were made in different time periods. The first phot which is the Head of Senusret III was made during the Middle Kingdom and the photo, Khafre was made in the Old Kingdom. Even though Senusret III and Khafre were both pharaohs of Egypt, both on them ruled different years. Khafre ruled in approximately from 2529-2494 BCE and Senusret III ruled from 1836-1818 BCE. Based on looking at the photos can see a lot of differences between the two sculptures. Senusret III is much smaller in size than Khafre. Senusret …show more content…
Senusret III head statue is made out of a yellow-brown rock by the name of yellow quartzite. Khafre is more intact and detailed than the Head of Senusret III. Reason being because the features on Senusret are destroyed like his chin, nose, and ears. It appeared to be that Senusret III might have had a beard on his statue but could have been removed. The only things that was removed from Khafre was the lion’s head and paws. The facial expressions on Khafre calm, pleasant, permanence while Senusret facial expression is saddening by the wrinkles on his forehead from hardship and fragility of human existence. Khafre statue is more idealistic, rigidly frontal, and cubic conception where as the Head of Senusret III than Senusret III Khafre sculpture had more meaning than Senusret III head sculpture. In the class lecture video, Khafre wore the traditional costume, the lions throne represented authority, the papyrus and lotus represented his power over upper and lower Egypt, his headdress had a cobra on the back that signifies the God Ra, Horus is on the back of the throne, and he wear a fake beard that symbolizes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The statue depicts Hatshepsut sitting upright very rigidly as a king; this type of structure is very common with other traditional Egyptian sculptures depicting pharaohs. Her legs are pressed together, back straight up in a 90 degree angle, and her hand is placed upon her legs close to her knees. The statue of Hatshepsut Seated shows Hatshepsut in ceremonial attire, she wears the headdress worn by many pharaohs before her. To me her facial expressions show a sense of dignity, pride, and femininity. She is wearing a skin…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, the statue of Khafre sits lifeless and majestic on his throne “flanked by lions” (3), which stabilizes and connects him to the original stone, out of which it is carved. He is eternally unmoving and has an expressionless face. This statue of Khafre was created as a vessel for his Ka and presents…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hatshepsut Research Paper

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One conclusion that can be made from this study relates not only to the depiction, but also to the increasing size of the statues. In the early years of her reign, the statues were small, showing she was probably still unsure of the people’ reaction to her usurpation. Later as her reign progressed, there was obviously no adverse reaction forthcoming, reflected in the larger size of the statues (the larger the statue, the more powerful the Pharaoh). This showed Hatshepsut’s growing confidence in her position as ruler of…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Lasmuss and Sphinx

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Not only do the Lamusses and Sphinx both hold power. They are also similar in that they were constructed by pharaohs to symbolize their strength. Although their bodies and heads don't exactly match; each has a human head and a body of an animal. One characteristic that is shared between these two guarding statues may been worn down over time, making them look different in the current time. Limestone was sculpted to create both of the statues. At one time, the Spinx also had a beard, however it wore away because it wasn't made of hard stone like the Lamuss was.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The King statue is a larger than life representation that looks different from the back and the front. The base of the statue has four panels, each with a different scene depicted on them. This makes the viewer motivated to walk around to each side and look at the panels. It is difficult to make a personal connection to this work because it is a lot higher than the viewer’s line of sight. It makes the viewer feel underneath the statue and not at eye level. However, the statue’s lifelike quality and naturalistic appeal provide a more personal experience.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The technique the artist used to construct and design the item relied heavily on symmetry. From the start of the back of the neck down to the start of the tail, a long undecorated line interrupted by a horizontal band of inscriptions around the neck appears to divide the sculpture medially. The simple shapes of the head a sphere with two rectangular ears atop it and a cone like neck below. Including a cylindrical body and legs. The artist’s etching of the lion’s face and body, as well as the three…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With this idea in mind, giving the sculpture realistic qualities helps view recognize who the subject was for the sculpture. Also, the king looks unfazed in this sculpture in…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Statue of Akhenaten

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Statues come in many different forms, sizes, styles, and reasons. After watching our online video and I saw a statue from “The New Kingdom” of the infamous Pharaoh Akhenaten. I was intrigued by the unusual features of this statue. They were unlike the traditional features on a statue I am accustomed to. My research was to find out a little more about this Pharaoh and why he was featured so radically different from the typical statues I was accustomed seeing from ancient times including that of ancient Egyptian tradition. I took a look at some historical facts to see if they may help put the pieces of the puzzle together.…

    • 891 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akhenaten Painting Style

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the Fourth Dynasty the art consisted of mainly architecture and sculptures. The famous pyramid structure during this time were more smooth on the sides because of their new layering technique, a good example in our book is figure 3.8 Model of the Great pyramids on page 57. One additional feature of the landmark of the Great pyramids is the Great Sphinx which is the following figure, figure 3.9 that is made from the same material as the pyramids. When it comes to statues and sculptures many of their human figures at this time were simply ageless and in an upright standing position or sitting on a throne for watching rituals and showing power. These statues were typically of royals such as a king and queen as you can see from figure 3.10 through 3.12 on pages 59 and 60. The characteristics in the statues were that they had wide…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Brooklyn Museum Visit

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For the first assignment in Dr. Crawford’s Art 100 class, the students have to visit the Brooklyn Museum’s Egypt Exhibit. From which we pick a artifact we thought was interesting and write a paper about the artifact; the artifact that I have chose is the Kneeling Statue of Senemut. The reason I found this artifact interesting, is because Senemut isn’t a person from royalty and what’s even more interesting, he was a official to a pharaoh whom was female.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Art Paper Outline

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fist, the “Seated statue of Gudea” is from 2150–2100 B.C. the Neo-Sumerian period. It is a 44cm tall Diorite statue. The description at the museum mentioned that this sculpture belongs to a series of diorite statues commissioned by Gudea, who was a Mesopotamian king. He rebuilt the great temples of Lagash and installed statue of himself in the temple. The posture of this statue is, an upright seated way on a throne like chair. It has its hands folded on its lap. It also is wearing a turban looking headwear with curls. It has a calm expression, large almond shaped eyes. It is wearing a draping robe. It has Sumerian inscription which lists the various temples that Gudea built or renovated in Lagash and names the statue itself, "Gudea, the man who built the temple; may his life be long."-Metropolitan Museum. The proportion of the figure seems to be odd. There is no neck, awkward sized feet, and the head is too large compared to the…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Peplos Kore

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Peplos Kore (c. 530 BCE)is a fine example of the Attica style, standing in a rigid pose, obedient and immobile as it were, yet bursting with strength and femininity through her soft arms, the kind features of her face, and the subtle suggestion of the curvature of her body under the heavy peplos. The ornate hair that drapes naturally on her shoulders, her measured “smile” and the pigmented iris bestow a sense of abundant vivacity and potential energy to the statue. A great deal of Kore statues have been unearthed at the acropolis, most dating back to the beginning of the 6th c. BCE. In fact the Acropolis collection tends to monopolize the Kore discourse because of the large number and breadth of stylistic variety that have been unearthed at this site. By definition, Kore (maiden) refers to statues depicting female figures, always of a young age, which were created during the Archaic period (600 – 480 BCE) either as votive or commemorative statues. Wealthy patrons commissioned them either to serve the deities in place of the patron, or as less often was the case, to become commemorative grave markers for members of a family. Many times their base (and sometimes on their dress) was inscribed with a short paragraph documenting the statue’s function, the patron, and the artist. According to the most accepted interpretations of the archaeological evidence, Kore statues never represented deities. Korai statues are the female equivalent of Kouros. There are several distinct differences between the two, with the most significant one being the fact that Kouros statues were almost always portrayed in the nude, while Kore were always clothed. Consequently, when studying the statues, we tend to focus on the development of anatomy in Kouros, and on the development of the dress for the Kore along with the facial expression. Most of the Kore statues are either life-size or a little smaller, and were developed with the same techniques and proportional…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout Egypt, during the middle empire art evolved as a symbol for power and permanence featuring straight lines and powerful figures; as time passed art evolved again morphing from simply representational images of man to the more idealized and anatomically correct style of Roman art. As art became more and more prevalent through the late 3rd and early 4th century’s artists began to focus more on anatomical perfection and realism borrowing artistic elements from other cultures such as the Greeks. Though the artistic styles of ancient Egypt and early Roman art vary widely, the underlying symbolism remains the same. This is clear in both the Egyptian Sculpture Vizier (Figure 1) and the Roman sculpture Bust of and Unknown Man (Figure 2). Where the ideas and concepts of both sculptures are essentially the same, their vastly different styles are evident of the time periods in which they were made.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The granite sculpture of Khafre Enthroned from Gizeh, Egypt, ca. 2500 BCE was recovered from the valley temple of pharaoh Khafre. Functioning as a funerary statue, it provided a substitute for the pharaoh’s soul, or ka. Khafre wears a plain kilt and displays Egyptian royalty with headdress and false beard. His flawless, muscular body sits upright with one hand clenched in a fist. In addition to rigid posture, Khafre’s face is emotionless yet serene. Iconography of divine rule and unification embellish the sculpture; with lion’s bodies and papyrus plants decorating the throne, and a falcon sheltering pharaoh’s head. Like the immortality of the soul, Khafre appears to be timeless without regard to his real age…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kritios Boy

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Kritios Boy exhibits a number of other critical innovations that distinguish it from the Archaic Kouroi (young male statues from the Archaic Period) that paved its way. The muscles and structure are depicted with an ‘unforced’ life-like accuracy, with the rib cage naturally expanded as if the statue is taking a breath of air, with a relaxed attitude and hips which are distinctly narrower. A final note to add is the ‘smile’ that represented the Archaic period, is now gone. It is replaced with a more serious look, a look more life-like then anything else before it. It was this look and the body structure that made it one of the most amazing statues of its…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays