Preview

Sentencing Offenders

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Sentencing Offenders
Task Four
Outline the power of the courts in sentencing offenders by using one example of a summary offence and indictable offence.
There are two main courts - Magistrates and Crown Court. Magistrates have less power than Crown. magistrates can sentence up to six months in custody. Crown Courts can sentence longer up to life in prison. An indictable offence is one tried by a jury in the Crown court. When a magistrates court feels that the offence is so serious they cannot sentence accordingly i/e give a harsher punishment, as the crime deserves in the public interest, or is clearly so serious such as rape or murder, they pass it to the Crown court "indictment".
A summary offence is one which can only be dealt with by a magistrates Court usually minor offences such as assault.
Every person has the right of appeal set in statute law. Appeals can only be dealt with by a higher court, so if you were sentenced to six months in a magistrate’s court you have to appeal to the Crown court. You can appeal against sentence or conviction for exqample you think six months is too harsh or you claim that you did not commit the offence you were convicted of.
If you were convicted of theft of a bike and were sentenced to 2 months in prison by the magistrates court - a summary offence - you may appeal because you think two months is too much or you claim you were innocent and believe you were wrongly convicted. Your avenue of appeal is to the Crown Court because only a higher court can overturn a lower court.
If you were convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison (this is the only sentence a judge can give because it is set in statute law) your avenue of appeal is to the Court of Appeal which has a higher status than Crown Court, you CAN NOT appeal against sentence for murder you can only appeal against conviction if you win you are free.
Grounds of appeal can be - new evidence - legal precedence, such as when an expert witness is proven to be wrong in his procedure

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The first offence attracted a lengthier sentence than the second offence, in which his liability was accessorial rather than…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of the court is to determine whether or not a crime has been committed and impose a sentence where appropriate. In the first instance the alleged offender will appear in the magistrates court where it will be decided whether or not to grant bail or remand in custody…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Romeo phillion research

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Appeal refers to the appellant, sometimes called the plaintiff in error, must file a notice of appeal, along with the necessary documents, to commence appellate review. The person against whom the appeal is brought, the appellee, then files a brief in response to the appellant's allegations.(http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Appeal+(law) which means requesting a formal change to an official decision. In this case only one appeal had taken place.in 2009 Romeo Phillion sat through his first and last appeal. However, should this appeal even had taken place? The case was reopened in 2006, and in March 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal overturned his 1972 murder conviction and granted him a new trial, in part because a 1968 police report establishing a clear alibi for Phillion had not been turned over to his defence lawyer. (trial.http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/phillion/) due to the fact that Phillion was wrongfully accused he should not have even had an appeal.…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All citizens of the UK have the legal right to arrest another person. This right is given to the public by section 24 of the Police and Criminal evidence act, but it actually dates back far before this to medieval times and English common law.…

    • 5689 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    approach” to sentencing a criminal because “courts allow this endless policy of appeal to such a…

    • 567 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The sentencing process can be extremely long or short. Regardless of how long the trials come out to be there is still a process that the court must go through. In this report I’m going to talk about the 5th, 6th, 14th amendments, and discuss the 5 philosophies of sentencing.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Narrowing the judges’ focus to only punishment and retribution would not serve the initial purpose of having a justice system at all. Certain members of the public may believe the opposite. These individuals believe that judges in our court system are too lenient on sentencing the accused. However, how knowledgeable are these individuals in the Australian justice system? In contrast to the expertise judges and Australian judicial workers have learnt through years of experience, must the public’s contradicting, non-expertise opinion determine the outcome of individuals accused of crime? Certainly, the law must take into account the values and expectations of the community. However, it is fundamental to our system of justice that there is the right of an offender to a fair trial must exist – this is protected in our current sentencing system. Under Section 5 of the Sentencing Act 1991 (Vic), a court should consider a number of objectives to determine the appropriate sentence; punishment, deterrence, denouncement, rehabilitation and protection. Sentencing legislation also specifies matters that courts must take into account when passing sentence, such as mitigating factors and the offender’s personal circumstances.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Determinate sentencing can take two forms: legislatively determined or judicially determined. In either case, the offender is sentenced to a specific term of incarceration. He or she is released at the expiration of the term, minus good time credits if they are available. There is no discretionary parole release, although there may be a period of supervision in the community. Under a legislatively determined structure, the legislature fixes by law the penalty for specific offenses or offense categories. In a judicially determined system, the judge has broad discretion to choose a sanction, but, once…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    M1 Custodial Care

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page

    Adjudications are formal procedures used in prisons which are like court hearings, but they are quicker and cost considerably less. The prisoner in the situation which is accused may been given legal advice. This would come from either prison staff or inmates, and they are known as your McKenzie friend. These Adjudications are put into process when an offence has taken place inside the prison involving inmates. For example offences would be things such as possession of contraband or physical assault towards another inmate, or a visitor. Depending on the severity of the situation there a different repercussions for their actions. They can have their privileges taken away, whether it is some of them or all of them. This would be things like, time out of their cell or in cell televisions. They could also have their wage for work lowered or stripped completely. This also depends on the scale of their actions. If what the accused has done is a large problem then they could have an extension put onto their sentence. The maximum for this is 42 days.…

    • 370 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2nd exam notes

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Appeals must be filed within a timely manor, no set time because various jurisdictions have different times…

    • 754 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abbott notes the importance of integrating theory and practice by asserting that professional expert knowledge, discretion and judgement rest at the interface between the work or tasks involved and the skill achieved through on-the-job training and practice and the abstract knowledge or theory that underpin this (Abbott 1988). This assignment will focus on a specific case (MS) that I have supervised during my traineeship and I will demonstrate my ability to assess, supervise, plan, intervene, review and evaluate a case by following the ASPIRE model of case management (Home Office 2005). MSs offence of theft was of an acquisitive nature, he stole a pair of trainers to sell on in order to fund his alcohol misuse. MS was sentenced at Rotherham Magistrates Court, for an offence of theft and was made subject to a twelve month Community Order under the Criminal Justice Act 2003. The following two requirements were imposed MS must attend Supervision to address his offending behaviour and an Alcohol Treatment Requirement to address his alcohol misuse. The reasons given behind this were that such a sentence would allow him to work with a Probation Officer in respect of the rehabilitation element. This proposal fits neatly with the anti-custody values of the Probation Service whose underlying concern is to deal with offenders in constructive ways which do not damage or degrade them. This is also related to other probation values of client self-determination and potential for change (Williams B 1995). Probation Orders are seen as punishments in themselves. Wasik and Taylor assert that the Criminal Justice Act 1991 introduced the Probation Order as a sentence of the court in its own right (Wasik and Taylor 1991 Pg48). Dunbar and Langdon argue that this Act was passed at a time when a major aim or criminal justice policy was to reduce prison numbers and ensure that sentences and the public saw community sentences as a viable option (Dunbar and Langdon 1998 Pg74). The…

    • 5078 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are Prisons too Lenient

    • 710 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Also we could address this problem through the use of lengthening sentences of prisoners whose sentence has been deemed “unlawfully lenient” by the court. This however will only happen if the whole court deems the sentence “unlawfully lenient” also the crime must reach certain conditions and must be done within 28 days of the trial. This is done by the Crown Prosecutor Service who goes through a process in considering whether a sentence was too lenient or was just.…

    • 710 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Autobiographical Writing

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The charges were read out, 8 offences in total. This was my 3rd appearance in court as it had been adjourned twice already while further interviews were conducted and further evidence collected. I knew this time I was going to get sentenced but had been reassured by my lawyer that I was “unlikely” to face jail time as it was my first offence. “Unlikely” is not what you want to hear and I genuinely thought I was going to be sick.…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death penalty report

    • 9692 Words
    • 39 Pages

    1- No sentenced to the death penalty is deprived of the right to appeal the ruling to a higher judicial authority or of the request for pardon or commutation of the sentence as the case may be.…

    • 9692 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics