Sentencing is important in the process. Sentencing philosophies or the justifications, on which various sentencing strategies are based, are joined with issues of religion, morals, values, and emotions. Sentencing a criminal can be from probation to sentenced to death. It consists of fines, probation, imprisonment or death. Fine is where you have to pay a certain amount. They are often used for minor violations, such as a speeding ticket. Fines are used when a person has no criminal record and the ability to pay. Probation is a sentenced served while under supervision by a supervising officer, which can withdrawal your ability to be in your community. Imprisonment is to confine someone, to take away an individuals freedom. Sentenced to death means that is was a higher crime, to where the criminal has no bail, no fines, no freedom, and the actual process of killing an individual. The relationship between sentencing and punishment is that in front of a judge who is going to tell you the consequences of your own actions.
If I had to choose to modify the sentencing process to reduce recidivism rate, I would have to say to be stricter on the punishment. If the first sentence is strict, it will allow the criminal to learn that doing a crime can take away your freedom for more then a couple days, or even on probation. I believe that is the reason why there is repeating and ongoing crimes. Overall, I think that the sentencing process is done accordingly.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Dozens of writers, reformists and activists have already narrated the story of America's harrowing prison epidemic spread wide by the politics of corporate greed and fueled daily by scapegoating the poor and vulnerable. With nearly twenty years experience in public policy development, criminal justice reform, and promoting alternatives to confinement, now comes Marc Mauer, Assistant Director of The Sentencing Project, a national organization based in Washington, D.C. which advocates for substantial changes in our ways of punishing criminal…
- 79 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The sentencing system should not be altered, for decreasing the focus and increasing the frequency of sentencing would do more harm than good. An emphasis on merely punishment and retribution in criminal sentencing would prevent the right of an offender to a fair trial. Furthermore, set and compulsory sentencing ignores personal circumstances, which in some cases could make all the difference. With these aggravating factors, hardening the system of law will not bring any advantages to society.…
- 697 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Keeping in mind the brief overview of each of the major rationales for sentencing will allow the following four arguments to be understood with greater clarity. To begin, the first argument to support the urgent need to restructure the criminal justice system is the effect and impact of mandatory minimum sentencing on the high rates of incarcerations. The effects of mandatory minimum sentencing are staggering, and transcend into many different areas of the criminal justice system. The principal justification for the creation of mandatory minimum sentences is that by increasing the likelihood of custody, it will be a strict deterrent for crime prevention and a response to political “tough on crime” strategies. It was also thought to minimize…
- 1521 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In this paper the topics that will be discussed will be what are the state and federal objectives of punishment? How does sentencing affect the state and federal corrections systems overall? With support for that answer, what is the determinate and indeterminate sentencing? As well as which sentencing model that is felt the most appropriate? With an explanation as to why and examples will be provided.…
- 992 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
Australia has nine sentencing jurisdictions with each jurisdiction possessing its own criminal justice system. Federal, state and territory criminal legislation generally specify offences with a prescribed maximum penalty which allows a court to determine an appropriate punishment in the particular circumstances of that case. In recent years, the Australian Parliament has increased proclaimed power over sentencing, setting a fixed or consistent penalty for committing a certain offence. This upsurge suggests that there is a public desire for tougher sentencing laws and dissatisfaction in the community with the traditional sentencing system where courts have had a broad discretion to punish offenders. The results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing shows that the majority of respondents expressed high levels of dissatisfaction and were displeased with sentences that are imposed by the courts.…
- 1488 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The following paragraphs will define and explain the differences between determinate and indeterminate sentences. This discussion may seem, at first blush, to be somewhat theoretical. However, the issue is a life-altering one for parole as an institution. In a determinate sentencing structure, there is no role for a paroling authority in making release decisions.…
- 423 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I was able to locate a public record from Clearfield’s Judge Cherry sentencing courts. The article shows the outline and decisions made for every individual who was sentenced on the said day. After reading through the long list of hearings, I chose one in particular to report on;…
- 665 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Sentences for crimes committed have been handed down for as long as there have been crimes to commit. There are many factors to be considered by the judge tasked with sentencing in a criminal case, including an offender’s criminal history and actual involvement in the commission of the offense. First-time offenders may be grated leniency in sentencing, but it can be argued that such a practice is contrary to the nature of punishment and detracts from the effects of the crime on the victims. Punishment serves three general purposes that serve to benefit the victim, the public, and the offender: retribution, prevention, and rehabilitation.…
- 951 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The case of Miller v. Alabama (2012) is the result of Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals case No. 10-9646, which involves a 14-year-old named Evan Miller who was convicted of aggravated murder, and sentenced by the Alabama state court to a mandatory term of life in prison without parole. Miller and a friend assaulted Miller 's neighbor, and set fire to his home after spending the evening drinking alcohol and using drugs. As a result of his actions, the neighbor died. Miller was originally charged as an adult; however, his case was removed to adult court, and he was charged with murder and arson. During the trial, the jury found Miller guilty of the crime, and he was sentenced to a punishment of life without parole as statutorily mandated (Supreme Court of the United States, 2011).…
- 1806 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Earlier responses to crime were to be brutal, which included torture, humiliation, mutilation, and branding. These kinds of punishments often attempted to relate the punishment to the crime, as close as possible. The first response to crime incorporated linking criminal acts to sin and developing strict punishments. Throughout the years, this thought process has changed into a more humane system. The reason for corrections to is to protect the society but also to provide rehabilitation to these individuals. Punishments for criminals now include main objectives that widely differ from the first believed aspects of punishments. Punishments now embrace objectives pertaining to deterrence, incarceration, rehabilitation, retribution and restitution.…
- 1495 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Sentencing is and has long been a crucial phase within the criminal justice process. Sentencing is what occurs post-conviction following an offender’s guilty plea or a trial by jury in which the offender is found guilty. The philosophy of sentencing is that of punishment for a crime committed. This punishment can include incarceration, rehabilitation, probation, fines, and community service. In order to prevent crime from occurring or re-occurring, a deterrent such as incarceration must exist.…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The purpose of sentencing: the “deserved infliction of suffering on evildoers and “the prevention of crime.” There four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing. First, the oldest and most common is retribution. Retribution is the philosophy that those who commit criminal acts should be punished based on the severity of the crime and that no other factors need be considered. The second philosophy is deterrence. In deterrence, the goal of sentencing is to prevent future crimes. Deterrence takes a general and specific form. General deterrence is that by punishing one person, others will be dissuaded from committing a similar crime. Specific deterrence assumes thart an individual, after being punished once for a certain act,…
- 1004 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Sentencing guidelines help judges and magistrates decide the appropriate sentence for a criminal offence. The sentence imposed on an offender should reflect the crime they have committed and be proportionate to the seriousness of the offence. The guidelines provide guidance on factors the court should take into account that may affect the sentence…
- 451 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…
- 159 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The factors that go into determining sentencing are broke into three steps. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is fixed by a sentencing authority and cannot be reduced by judges or other corrections officials. A factor that can change incarceration time is that of “good time”, this is when a reduction in time served by a prisoner is based on good behavior and other positive actions. This is said to promote discipline…
- 353 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays