Preview

Seperate Legal Entity Salamon Case

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
327 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Seperate Legal Entity Salamon Case
Question 1
A corporation is a separate legal entity from its owners. The principle of separate legal entity is a fundamental of company law, and is demonstrated by SS119 and 124 of the Corporations Act. In other words, if a corporation, in the course of doing business, is involved in any legal action, then the corporation, for legal purposes, is its own person. The corporation is liable for its debts, not the members; members do not have the proprietary interest in the company assets. This is how corporations may sue and be sued, and their assets are tracked separately. If a corporation is sued, then the owners will not have their personal belongings at risk unless those belongings were purchased with illegal returns from the corporation.
From 1897, The Salomon’s Case (1897) AC 22 was authority for the legal principle that an incorporated company is a separate legal entity from its founder, shareholders, directors and agents. The court in this case held that the company is legally incorporated it must be treated like any other independent person with its rights and liabilities appropriate to itself. From this case, many legal ramifications has been put forward: distinction between private and company debts, distinction between private and company assets and the company can contract with its members and be liable in tort to a member. In addition, a company has the power to do the followings: own and dispose of property and other assets, enter into contracts and sue or be sued.
House of Lords held that the company was a different legal person from the shareholders, and thus Mr Salomon, as a shareholder and creditor, was totally separate in law from the company A Salomon & Co Ltd. The result was that Mr Salomon was entitled to be repaid the debt as the first secured creditor.
In this case, Mr Salomon was the major shareholder, a director, an employee and a creditor of the company he

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    HCS 567 Week 3

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Easterbrook, F., & Fischel, D. (1985). Limited liability and the corporation. The Inversity of Chicago Law Review, 89-117.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LOBOFinal Exam 2

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jack, Tom and Mary are executive directors of Photolab Ltd. Jack owns 8% of the shares, Tom 15% and Mary 7%. 15% of the shares are owned by 700 shareholders and the remaining 55% shares are owned by Photoproductions Ltd. Although Tom has never been formally appointed as managing director of the company, he has assumed that role and the other directors allow him to do so. The Board was aware that Tom’s business card described him as the managing director of Photolab Ltd. Often Tom entered into contracts on behalf of the company binding the company up to $1 million dollars without seeking the prior approval of the board. The company, however, always honoured these contracts.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Finance Midterm

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although the stockholders of the corporation are insulated by limited legal liability, the legal status of the corporation does not protect the firm’s managers in the same way, i.e., bondholders can sue its managers if the firm defaults on its debt.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A corporation is considered a legitimate entity that is governed by law. As a artificial person, a corporation can perform every one of the errands that a genuine person can do, similar to pay expenses, collect obligation, go into contracts, be considered responsible for carelessness and make a profit. (Miller 462) A corporation must be developed by one or more people. The shareholders record Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State. The minute the Articles of Incorporation are in place, the pay state charges for incorporation (Miller 489) At the point when the sum total of what necessities have been met, a state official ordinarily the Secretary of State – issues the sanction. (Miller 467) Entrepreneurs should have a lawyer document the papers. (Miller 457) Attributable to the legitimate structures of corporations, there are various focal points:…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon1 affirmed the legal principle that, upon incorporation, a company is generally considered to be a new legal entity separate from its shareholders. The court did this in relation to what was essentially a one person company. Windeyer J, in the High Court in Peate v Federal Commissioner of Taxation,2 stated that a company represents:…

    • 15226 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal Assignment

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to the Walker case at 6 per Justice Mason, a corporate group is “a number of companies associated by common or interlocking shareholdings, allied to unified control or capacity to control.” Accordingly, Lord Justice Roskill in Albazeo case observed:…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The general rule is that shareholders, board of directors, and corporate officers are not liable for the debt of corporation. An exception is allowed, however, when such is to prevent abuse of the privilege of corporate status during which courts sometime pierce the corporate veil to expose shareholders and directors/officers to liability. The factors considered by the courts to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil include; commingling of funds and other assets, unauthorized diversion of corporate funds to use other than the benefit of the corporation and contracting with another with intent to avoid performance by use of a corporate entity as a shield against personal liability.…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Allen’s Arthur Robinson.2007, Directors Duties during Insolvency, 2nd Edition, and Thomson Law book Co., ISBN 9780455223490.…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    "The 16th edition incorporates a number of significant recent amendments to legislation and case law. These include: Personal Property Securities (Corporations and Other Amendments) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Financial Market Supervision) Act 2010 [...], Corporations Amendment (Corporate Reporting Reform) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Sons of Gwalia) Act 2011 [...], Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Director and Executive Remuneration) Act 2011 [...]. This edition also includes a number of important cases, the most significant of which are Morley v ASIC and ASIC v Healey, dealing with directors' duty of care." -- Back cover.…

    • 41100 Words
    • 141 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    (b) The creditors of RedHot Pty Ltd (Redhot) appointed Mrs Sherman as the receiver to take possession of the secured property, sell it and use the proceeds to repay the secured debt owed by the company. The receiver borrowed $42,000 from Westpac bank during his appointment; however, there were insufficient funds available from the secured assets realisation to completely pay the debt, so that a shortfall exists. The receiver argued that the Managing Director of Red Hot must pay the shortfall.…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Businesses as companies and corporations have a separate legal entity from its members. It is considered as an independent person with its own rights and liabilities, therefore the corporation is obligated to pay its own liabilities and debts. Also, corporations have other rights such as the right to enter into contracts, sue or be sued, hold assets and properties in its own name, hire agents or even make its own laws. (Gisbon & Fraser, 2012)…

    • 1907 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A company is a distinct legal entity created by statute. Companies have many of the same legal rights and obligations as do individuals. They can own and sell property, they can hold profits or acquire debts, they can enter into contracts and sue or be sued, and governments can tax them. Companies are advantageous primarily because they become legal entities that are separate and distinct from the individuals who own and control them. This separation is important because in most cases these individuals have limited or no legal liability for the company's wrongdoings.…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A very direct consequence which arises with the concept of separate legal identity of a corporation is the misuse of it by people. In reality a company is nothing but an association of persons, who are its beneficiaries, governed by the directors and shareholders of the company. It is nothing but a sum of its members. Thus a lot of times situations arise, when these beneficiaries try to misuse this veil and in such situations the corporate veil of separate legal entity of the company has to be removed and the members of the company are made liable directly. Lifting of corporate veil is one of the most highly debated topics in the business world. The concept of incorporation was introduced only to promote high risk involving but at the same time more profitable businesses among common people as company means limited liability(in its most common form), thus people can limit the risk by forming companies. So if we look at the main purpose behind formation of companies we can easily understand why lifting of corporate veil is such a debatable issue. If the conditions for lifting of corporate veil are made too lenient then the whole purpose behind the concept is defeated and also if the conditions are kept very rigid and narrow then there is a very high risk of misuse of the corporate veil, which would be against the public interest at large. Which is why time and again the issue keeps coming up to the judiciary. The researcher has dealt with the judicial trend on the issue…

    • 2128 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Salomon Case

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr.Salomon was a wealthy man and he was a boot and shoe manufacturer trading on his own sole account. In 1982, he decided to convert the business into a limited company. Fot this purpose, “Aron Salomon and Company Limited” was formed with liability limited by shares. The memorandum of the company was subscribed by Aron Salomon, his wife and five of his children. The intention of having his own family members in the memorandum is to retain the business in their own hands. The company purchased the business for £39,000 and the price was satisfied by a sum amounting to £20,000 was paid to Aron Salomon who then immediately returned it to the company in exchange for fully paid shares; a sum amounting to £10,000 was paid in debentures for the like amount and the balance sum with the exception of about £1,000 which Aron Salomon seemed have received and retained went in discharge of the debts and liabilities of the business at the time of purchase.Apart from the fully paid shares, Aron Salomon received for his business about £1,000 in cash and £10,000 in debentures.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays