Assess the reasons for British concerns in the Balkans and the Mediterranean in the period 1856-1902…
Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…
My partner and I stand in negation of the resolution, “Resolved: unilateral military force is justified by the United States to prevent nuclear proliferation” for three reasons. First, interfering with foreign affairs using military force gives many countries all the more reason to undergo nuclear proliferation. Second, the fact that military force by the U.S. is unilateral, many countries are in disfavor of it and finally, preventing nuclear proliferation is too great for the U.S. alone to handle.…
How did the human rights issue come about? Who does it affect and how? How does it affect human rights? It influences human rights since it is hushing their entitlement to the right to speak freely, and they are being constrained, compelled, or cheated into cutting edge bondage. It has influenced such a large number of individuals in light of the fact that there is no control and avoidance. These individuals are dealt with insolently, ladies being utilized, men being utilized for work, and even youngsters being made to offer blooms or ask for cash so they can live. This is influencing their human rights by not permitting flexibility of expression .…
I write to you concerning the recent assassination of the Austrian Archduke and heir to the Austro Hungarian Empire, Franz Ferdinand. We as Serbians and Slav 's must celebrate the actions of Gavrilo Princip and must realise that he is a hero for Slav 's over Europe. Although Gavrilo killed the Austrian and his Wife in a most undignified manner it is the only way for us as loyal Serbians to reject the ways of the imperialistic Austro-Hungarians. We have been run by foreign powers for too long my brothers! Princip is a 54hero! The Black Hand and Mlada Bosna are heroes! The Hapsburgs want to control us as the Ottomans did! I as a loyal and proud Serbian will not stand for this and it is our actions today that will either make or break our nation of Serbia. One hundred years ago our forefathers rose up against the Sultan and now the Hapsburgs wish to run our country for us? My Grand-Father fought the Ottoman 's in Belgrade in 1862 and they managed to send the Turk 's back to Turkey! Surely we can remain a sovereign nation keeping the Austrians out.…
References: Bamford, James. (2004) A Pretext for War: 9 ⁄ 11, Iraq and the Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies. New York: Doubleday. Blix, Hans. (2004) Disarming Iraq. New York: Pantheon Books. Bush, George W (June 1, 2002) New Threats Require New Thinking. In The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions, edited by Micah Sifry and Christopher Cerf. New York: Simon and Schuster. Clean Break Report. 1996. Study Group a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000 headed by Richard Perle. Available at http://www.iasps.org/strat1.htm. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Cooper, Marc. (2004) Soldier for the Truth: Exposing Bush’s Talking-Points War. LA Weekly, February 20–26. Available at http://www.laweekly.com/2004/02-19/news/soldier-for-the-truth/. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Cox, Michael. (2004) Empire, Imperialism and the Bush Doctrine. Review of International Studies 30 (4): 535–608. Duelfer, Charles A. (2002) What Saddam Wants Weapons of Mass Destruction. In The Iraq War Reader: History, Documents, Opinions, edited by Micah L Sifry and Christopher Cerf. New York: Simon and Schuster. Duelfer, Charles. (2004) Duelfer Report. Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq’s WMD. Available at https://www.cia.gov/library/reports/general-reports-/iraq_wmd_ 2004/index.html. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Feith, Douglas. (June 4, 2004) Briefing. DoD Briefing on Policy and Intelligence Matters. Available at http://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/library/news/2003/intell-030604-dod01.htm. (Accessed March 10, 2009). Feith, Douglas. (2008) War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism. New York: Harper Collins. Ferguson, Charles. (2005) Director. No End in Sight. New York: Magnolia Pictures. Flowers, ML. (1977) A Laboratory Test of Some Implications of Janis’s Groupthink Hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 888–896.…
Over the course of the years world history has continued to change. New conflicts are constantly developing. In order to keep these conflicts under control special foundations and laws such as the United Nations and the Declaration of Human Rights have been founded. Despite the creation of the United Nations and the issuance of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, conflict has continued in the post-World War II era. The attempts at keeping peace have and have not been effective since conflicts around the world keep reoccurring…
The foreign policy for the United States has an obligation to make a huge effort for safety measures and precautions. Worldwide terrorism, pandemonium in Arab countries, is rising poverty in the developing world, and international economics antagonism has formed an intercontinental excavation for leaders in America. Those leaders in the U.S. have to focus energies on protecting securities of American citizens, and making sound trade agreements, ensuring the access to essential raw resources, and stop the increase of nuclear arms, with nations or terrorist networks that are unfriendly. The United States government must be selective in involvement and in global relationships, but must be prepared to protect the American people in the U.S. and aboard against any threats to the United States, prosperity and security, however, this policy may bring resentment and lead those in the Middle East to be bitter against us. The world as we see it is an interdependent and interconnected world. The United States cannot situate alone. General limitations to the United States borders are no longer capable to the stop the progress the break out of AIDS, child prostitution worldwide terrorism, and drug trafficking, other global scourges. The United Sates government is obligated to take the initiative to convey the leaders of all nations in the world to play a joint leadership role in strengthening the UN’s role in the global issues the affect the environment, and the worlds…
This resolution set the terms to eliminate Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. However, this act did not guarantee the cooperation from Saddam Hussein and inculcated massive fear from other nations security. The United States, Germany, Russia and Great Britain had the strong belief that Saddam’s Hussein had indeed reconstructed his nuclear weapon program. According to Greg Young’s lecture on January 21, 2016, there was strong intelligence verification of Hussein intent and capability to use them as he had before in the Iran-Iraq territorial dispute of 1990-1998. This Intelligence led George W. Bush to invade Iraq in 2003. His agenda consisted of eliminating the biggest threat and his nuclear power, tearing down the government and army to rebuild a new one. Nonetheless, he was wrong. The weapon program was…
Six months ahead of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the United States had very little incisive evidence and relied greatly on analytic reviews and judgment in assessing what it knew about Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction and their WMD Programs. This is according to declassified U.S. intelligence report.…
“Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds,” (Oppenheimer, 1965, 0:47). So said Julius Robert Oppenheimer, one of the men credited with creating the atomic bomb, when describing the first test detonation of a nuclear weapon on July 16, 1945, at the Alamogordo Bomb Range in New Mexico ( Sublette, 1999), as he quotes the Hindu holy text, the Bhagavad Vita. Nuclear weapons have only been used in warfare twice, both times by the United States during World War I, when the United States dropped the ‘Fat Man’ and ‘Little Boy’ bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945 (Sublette, 1999). In the 60 intervening years, a number of other nations have since developed nuclear weapons of their own. Because of nuclear proliferation, and the unparalleled destructive power of atomic weapons, nuclear non-proliferation has become an international concern, with the United States leading the charge. The past decade, however, has seen new nations try to enter the ‘nuclear club’ the most recent country being Iran. A nuclear armed Iran poses many concerns to the United States. In this paper, I will discuss the history of Iran’s nuclear program, what steps have been taken to curb the Iranians efforts, and where the two major political parties of the United States stand on the issue.…
Analyze the history of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), biological weapons, chemical weapons, and nuclear weapons and the future threat of WMD.…
The first decade after the end of the Cold War was full of high expectations, hopes for changes and great challenges for the newly established world order. From the very beginning of the new era, the international community had to face tasks and questions that had not come up in the previous years. Therefore, there was not a verified pattern how to handle these situations and new solutions needed to be carried out.…
The NPT has three pillars: non-proliferation, disarmament and peaceful uses of nuclear energy (The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty). However, some countries that signed onto it have violated the treaty. For example in 1999, the United States stored weapons in 27 countries, which goes against Article I of the treaty, which states “not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.” The recipient countries that signed the treaty were considered non-nuclear weapon states and violated Article II, which prohibits them to receive any nuclear weapons. There has also been concern that the entire purpose of the NPT is to police the activities of its non-nuclear weapon member-states (Jayaprakash 43-45). Although there are flaws in both types of agreements, there are more WMD treaties that are successful. WMD pose more of a threat to nations, and countries are doing their best to destroy and prevent the use of these…
Intro-Weapons of mass destruction have been a forceful weapon for any country to have and a danger for all on earth.…