Preview

Shakespeare- Richard the Second

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1146 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shakespeare- Richard the Second
Richard II
For further information regarding the critical and stage history of Richard II, see SC, Volumes 6, 24, 39, 52, 58, and 70.
INTRODUCTION
Richard II (ca. 1595) is the first drama of Shakespeare's second historical tetralogy, a sequence of chronological narratives based on events in the late fourteenth and early fifteenth centuries that chronicle the ascent of the Lancastrian line to the throne of England. In the play, Richard, an ineffectual monarch and the last of the Plantagenet kings, is deposed and imprisoned after his cousin Henry Bolingbroke launches a successful coup to usurp the English crown. Following Richard's assassination, Bolingbroke becomes King Henry IV, the subject of the following two plays in the sequence. Written entirely in verse, Richard II features what numerous critics perceive as Shakespeare's most brilliantly realized rhetorical tragedy, a work centered on the poetic, introspective persona of King Richard II. Devoid of the spectacular battles, much of the violence, and the epic sweep of Shakespeare's subsequent historical works, the play has sometimes been faulted for dramatic unevenness, but is nevertheless highly regarded for its moments of superbly crafted and penetrating poetic dialogue. Dorothy C. Hockey (1964) compares the dramatic language of Richard II to Shakespeare's later dramas, noting that while his later dramas use a masterful plain style that seamlessly incorporates prose and verse, the ornate and elevated rhetorical manner of Richard II elegantly matches the play's high style and regal subject.
Character-based study of Richard II has overwhelmingly focused on its title figure, and on the relationship between Richard and his usurping rival, Henry Bolingbroke. In general, Richard has been viewed in sharp contrast with Shakespeare's other English kings. Louise Cowan (1981) characterizes Richard II as a dignified but brooding monarch whose irresponsibility as a ruler is an affront to his hereditary authority. His

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    King Richard’s ability as an actor within a play explores how this type of villainy was entertaining in the era of Shakespeare. Richard’s evil is immediately established as his moral deformities are clearly embodied in his physical deformities. In justifying his premeditated meddling, he personifies war in his first soliloquy. ‘Grim visag’d war hath supported his wrinkled front’ and moved to caper ‘ nimbly in a lady’s chamber!’ Richard’s nature: ‘Deform’d, unfinished’ thus justifies his evil as he cannot participate in the war -lovemaking atmosphere. This was obviously a form of entertainment to the Shakespearean audience who had known of the war of the Roses and Richard’s deformities.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intrinsic to both texts, there is the notion that art is used to directly influence and impact existing historical perceptions. Shakespeare’s “Richard III” explores this idea, using the most influential artistic medium of the time, theatre, to further publicise the ‘Tudor Myth’ perception. On stage, the visual motif of Richard’s appearance as “deformed, unfinished” reflects his moral deficiencies, reinforced by his soliloquys and asides that expose his underlying treachery. He forges a duplicitous role as both director and actor within the play, stating in the opening soliloquy “plots that I have laid, inductions dangerous…” Richard seemingly ‘stage manages’ the entirety of his world, creating a sense of dramatic irony from the juxtaposing of the different “masks” he feigns in contrast to his true intentions; he plays the role of the “grieving” brother, “Christian prince,” etc. As such, Richard’s meta-theatricality engages us on a psychological level that reinforces the perception of the Tudor Myth given not just the heinous nature of his crimes but the “villainous”…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By analysing the parallels and differences between King Richard III and Looking For Richard, the responder is positioned to appreciate the distinctive contexts from which each text emerged. Whilst an exploration of the moral vices and corruptive consequences of the relentless pursuit of power is explored in both texts, a closer examination of the way power is represented…

    • 1076 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Deposition of Richard II, it is obvious that the English king was disliked by all. A list of his grievances was drawn up, citing all of his poor choices as king and the reasons why he should be dethroned. The number one cause of the hatred of him was “his evil rule, that is, he has given the goods and possession…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In KRII, Richard’s evil dual personality was an inconceivable concept to the Elizabethan audience. They viewed Richard as a renowned villain of history during the War of the Roses, and only as a villain within the play. This allowed no room for tragedy, as they did not sympathise with Richard. Richard’s villainy was also further emphasised in his physical deformity, hinting at the corruption of the mind. Richard is seen as the vice of morality plays, and an example of the Christian devil in how he acts and constantly reminds us that he is “…determined to prove a villain” [Act 1, Scene 1] in his soliloquies and asides.…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The texts King Richard III and Looking for Richard both accept the centrality of power and the yearning for it, as a central plot driver and an assumed part of the human condition. However, each presents a different perspective as to the nature of power; its origins and morality.…

    • 2201 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Audiences at the time would have been shocked by his character and Shakespeare achieves this by contrasting what Richard…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    hsc essay 33

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard III- Richard, himself is very aware of the gap between his outwards reality and inward reality. As a consequence he carefully constructs his façade while fully acknowledging his Machiavellian motivations to the audience in his asides.…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A deeper understanding of ambition and identity emerges from pursuing the connections between King Richard III and Looking for Richard.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    differed in the way they viewed Richard III. This could have been because the writer's attitudes…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Jane Eyre

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Our interest in the parallels between King Richard III and Looking For Richard is further enhanced by consideration of the marked differences in textual form. Evaluate this statement in the light of your Comparative Study of King Richard III and Looking For Richard.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Foster, Edward E. "Hamlet, Prince Of Denmark." Masterplots, Fourth Edition (2010): 1-4. Literary Reference Center. Web. 3 Feb. 2013.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brothels and Convents

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Cited: Allen, David G. and Robert A. White. “Subjects on the World 's Stage: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance.” Shakespeare Quarterly. Vol. 48, No. 1, (Spring, 1997), pp. 110-113. Folger Shakespeare Library. 12 June, 2013.…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Doty, Jeffrey S. “Shakespeare’s Richard II, “Popularity,” and the Early Modern Public Sphere.” Shakespeare Quarterly 61.2 (Summer 2010): 185-205. Project MUSE. Web. 09 Sept. 2010.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays