Preview

Shakespeare S Henry IV Part I Explores What It Means To Be An Honest And Honourable Man

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1003 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shakespeare S Henry IV Part I Explores What It Means To Be An Honest And Honourable Man
‘Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part I explores what it means to be an honest and honourable man.’ Discuss
In Shakespeare’s King Henry IV, Part, the playwright aims to present differing views of the time on the themes and notions of being deceptive and honourable, through situation as well as character. Consequently the playwright leads to the central question what it means to be a man. William Shakespeare’s interpretation is reflected in the perfect transformation of Prince Hal. Shakespeare’s main characters Hotspur, Falstaff and Prince Hal display different understandings of honour and deception in order to support Shakespeare’s establishment of the nobility of Hal as he rises to take his place as Prince of Wales, future King. In addition to this, the concept of honour is seen to be derived from each individual’s characteristic interpretation. The proud and arrogant Hotspur is besotted with the idea of personal honour to a degree that it becomes a fault in his character, something Prince Hal needs to avoid. Falstaff represents honour among thieves”, he has an inverse comprehension of what honour means, a cowardly perception centred very much on his safety and comfort and as such represents the world of moral decay which the Prince must eschew. The idea of deception is something that Shakespeare places great emphasis on. He acknowledges that deception is part of a make-up of the medieval man, such as Hal, but is something that must be carefully managed, as witnessed with the demise of both the scheming Lord Worcester and the brutally honest Harry Percival. Shakespeare sets King Henry IV part 1 in changing times, there is a new king on the throne and there is social upheaval in and around the country. As a result traditional concepts such as honour and the beliefs surrounding them have been subsequently challenged. This is mimicked through the “portly” Sir Jack Falstaff who a knight himself forsake his feudal duties and adopted the tavern life of the common folk.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hal and falstaff

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In act IV, prince Hal and Falstaff develop unusual relations. The two characters frequently exchange good-natured insult towards each other. The reader comes to see this as a reality as they are unfit to have a good relationship with each other. Though they are related through blood, they hate each other with the spontaneous insult they have in this act. Prince Hal is the surrogate son of Falstaff. He is the factious son. Falstaff is said to be the second father. He is like a parent who does not care about their son’s wellbeing. He has no respect at prince Hal. On the hand, prince Hal is the one who persuades him to emulate him to take his parental role. Their relationship with each other leads to the development of a character similar to King Henry. They all want to impress their audience. Falstaff seems to influence Hal into developing character of King Henry. He wants him to like a leader. He teaches him to learning the art of appreciating every small gift the society has to offer. Though Hal relationship is completely different from his relationship with…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Initially Hotspur is held up as a superb soldier and a model of chivalry and honour in marked contrast with Hal’s idleness and frivolity. The contrast between the two Harrys begins in Act 1 with King Henry’s praise of Hotspur’s victories in battle. Hotspur is referred to as ‘gallant Hotspur’ and the King describes him as ‘fortunes minion and her pride’, comparing him unfavourably to his own Harry who is stained with ‘riot and dishonour’. The comparison is further taken up when our introduction to Hotspur, fresh from battle, is juxtaposed with our introduction to Hal, drinking and planning frivolous robberies in the Boar’s Head Tavern with his Eastcheap friends. Hotspur is clearly a man of action to a degree that he becomes almost a parody of someone who is obsessed by honour gained in chivalric fashion through great victories in battle . His exaggerated claim that he will ‘pluck up drowned honour by the locks’ so that he alone may wear her garland and reap the full honour, paints a picture of a young man who is overly concerned with honour to the extent that he cannot spare time for his wife or await the opportune moment for further victory through the rebellion.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reflecting Elizabethan moral absolutes, Shakespeare acknowledges that a capacity for deception, manipulation and the quest for power is central to the human condition and clearly delineates the complex nature of evil in the character of Richard. Shakespeare dramatically portrays Richard’s villainous intentions and motivations to the Elizabethan audience in the opening soliloquy announcing- “he is made villain” to “usurp” the throne like a symbolic “usurping boar” being physically and morally “deformed” by his craving for power. Subsequently, Richard uses his guises as a tool for deception; he is a passionate lover desperately “wooing Lady Anne” yet a conniving murderer killing her husband, also ironically appearing to be a “loyal loving brother” by eradicating “George” himself. Shakespeare then reaffirms the results of human’s corruption and insatiability for power to the Elizabethan audience as he “proves a villain” must “fall prey to his” own “subtle and treacherous”…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dreamsong 29 Analysis

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “There sat down, once, a thing on Henry’s heart só heavy, if he had a hundred years & more… Henry could not make good”.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hotspur's Views On Honor

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Honor is commonly associated with people in places of high worthiness and respect, in Henry IV – Part 1 we aren’t given a set definition of what they view honor to be. Instead, honor has different meanings to different characters in the play. Shakespeare portrays his views on honor through the characters of Hotspur, Falstaff, and Hal. Since these characters have such contrasting views on honor it creates conflict for them with other individuals because they aren’t able to see eye to eye on their opposing actions.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nutt1

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "Henry V." Shakespearean Criticism. Ed. Michelle Lee. Vol. 107. Detroit: Gale, 2007. Literature Resource Center. Web. 9 Feb. 2015…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A values that is used in both King Richard III and Looking for Richard is the value of integrity. In order to claim power to the throne, Richard uses much deceit and the misuse of power throughout the play, which highlights Richard’s lack of integrity. It is through such devious and detailed schemes that the audience is able understand the importance of the value of integrity throughout one’s life. One of the clear misuses of power can be seen in the scene of the innocent murder of the princes where Tyrrel expresses “The tyrannous and blood act is done, the most arch deed of piteous massacre that ever yet this land was guilty of…within their alabaster innocent arms. Their lips were four red roses on a stalk…A book of prayers on their pillow lay.” Through this quote, Tyrell describes the murder as the most ruthless in the country and pledges the innocence of the princes through their pure, white skin, red lips and uses religious imagery to describe their angelic innocence. The juxtaposition of the evil deed of their murder and the description of the innocence of the princes highlights the evil that has come out of…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Shakespeare’s play Hamlet (1601) explores Hamlet’s growing insecurities and uncertainties, which stem from his attempt to find certainty and order within his changing transitioning society. Hamlet’s strong moral code and genuine grief at the beginning of the play contrasts with his descent into madness and deceit, as the corruption of the court begin to deteriorate his integrity and eventually lead to his tragic downfall. Throughout the play Shakespeare explores universal notions of authenticity contrasted with duplicity, the struggle between action and inaction and challenging the archetypal tragedian. Through an exploration of these themes, Shakespeare attempts to use the characters in his play to reflect his view on humanity and the shifting, conflicting paradigms between Medieval and Renaissance thinking.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s ‘Richard III’ and Pacino’s ‘Looking for Richard’ ground the evil of Richard differently in their respective texts. Shakespeare’s Richard is not merely an ambitious villain, but the personification of a metaphysical evil – a Machiavellian prince whose vice-like character is derived from the medieval morality play. Broad contextual shifts have resulted in Pacino recreating a villain for our times, emphasising mainly the political characteristics of a tyrant-king rendered recognisable to a modern audience. Out of all of the numerous characteristics of human nature Shakespeare delved upon in Richard III and by extension Pacino in Looking for Richard, none are more compelling or personal than the human conscience.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Iv Part Ii

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare's writing for his speeches captures an audiences’ attention. In the play, King Henry IV Part II, Shakespeare writes a soliloquy about a monarch who is angry and frustrated with the inability to sleep. Shakespeare uses diction, imagery, and syntax to evoke the feelings of the King to display his mind set. As an individual reads King Henry’s words, one experiences a flow of emotion.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Much Ado and Richard Iii

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Shakespeare, William, P.A. Daniel, and Charles Praetorius. Richard III. London: Produced by C. lllllPraetorius, 1889. Print.…

    • 2785 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamlet, You Crazy

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The early England’s notion of honor described by Terry is promise. Men were considered honorable simply by right of birth and involved forever loyalty to one’s lord. Honor simply gave its holder dignity and status of a true honorable man, and this was categorized as the most important feature in a man. However during the Renaissance period, there was a major shift in the beliefs of honor. Terry said, “One of the most complex changes in the code of honor was a move from an external code to an internalized concept of what it is to be an honorable man.” (Terry 1071) The involvement of blood and lineage stopped coming in to play and in every situation, men behaved to please both “their state and their god.” (1071) The modern code of honor is heavily affected by religious affair and needs to satisfy god and one’s loyalty. Hamlet, the protagonist of the play is caught in an ambiguous world, the pressure between the old and the new code of honor leads him to become mad and think of…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Henry V is displayed as an honest and noble character. Shakespeare explores this nature of integrity clearly by displaying the audience with Henry’s innermost thoughts in addition to presenting him with situations, which test his virtue. Shakespeare continually contrasts the Dauphin with Henry and therefore effectively brings to the audience’s attention the admirable characteristics of Henry. Throughout the play Henry puts the needs of his kingdom above his own which proves his patriotism and shows that he possesses the qualities of a good King. This in turn relates to the chain of being because every time he gives an order he refers to God and Henry’s people refer to him. Through the use of literary devices such as soliloquies, juxtapositions, motifs and the strong use of central themes Shakespeare emphasises the integrity of Henry V.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays