Preview

sharecropping

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
472 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
sharecropping
Sharecropping
What is sharecropping and tenant farming and when did these systems develop? At the end of the Civil War, Sharecropping- doing the farming for a portion of the crops and profits. Tenant Famers usually gave rent to the landowner for a house and farm land.
What were the advantages and disadvantages of sharecropping? The advantages were that you could get a home and land by working, the cons were that you made little to no profits.
What were conditions like for sharecropping families? The houses were not very good, there was not running water, and you stayed poor and in dept most of the time also you had to work long days to provide for your family..
Describe the relationship between landowners and sharecroppers. Awkward and the landowners would sometimes be unfair to the sharecroppers.
What similarities and differences existed between sharecropping and slavery? In sharecropping you were free and you could make a few decisions of your own but mostly all of your resources were expended by paying the landowner.
Summarize the system of tenant farming and share cropping. Why did these systems develop? These two systems were similar to renting, you basically worked all day to be able to have land and a house provide by the landowner. Poor people and homeless newly freed slaves needed homes and land so they worked out a plan with the landowners.
Why did many freed slaves become sharecroppers? What do you think would be at risk for a freed slave to become a sharecropper on his former master’s plantation? They were slaves not long ago so they had nothing but the clothes on their back so they needed land and a home. The master would still be used to treating the slave badly and it would be very awkward.
If you had to choose between being a tenant farmer or a sharecropper, which would you choose and why? A tenant farmer, it was similar to renting so you could keep all of the crops that you wanted and you pay the owner money for rent.
How would you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At first the Bureau had gave 850,000 acres to the freedmen but President Andrew Johnson later took it back and the land in turn were given to the Confederate landowners giving the blacks no choice and forcing them to work in the plantations. At first the white landowners wanted to restore gang labor but the freedmen wanted to maintain their freedom refused to sign the contract ultimately forcing the white owner to come up with sharecropping as some sort of compromise. Under sharecropping, the land was divided into a 20 to 50 acres parcel that allowed a single family to farm it. The deal is usually half of the crop to be given to the landlord in exchange for the land, housing and…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sharecropping was just a step up from slavery, but it allowed newly freed slaves to "somewhat" have something of their own. I say somewhat because their former master still had control over them because they had to sign a sharecropping contract. This sometimes required them to work 10 hours a day and also in harsh conditions. If the sharecropper went against the contract then it would be deducted from their pay. However, through this they were not land owners. They got paid for their work, but some of that money went to taking care of their family and the rest went to paying back debt they owe. They would ultimately in this cycle of owing because they do not make…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SOC 203 Week 5 DQ1

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    a. How does the corporatization of farming affect all Americans, not just those living in rural areas? What can you do about this?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that the south’s economy was based off of agricultural goods was one of the reasons that slavery became so common down there. Compared to the south,…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abner Snopes sharecrops for a living. His sharecropping results in his resentment of the wealthy. As you know, sharecroppers are tenant farmers who pay as rent a share of their crop for wealthy people. Sharecropping was common during this era; McCullough notes that "when the sharecroppers receive their portion of the money from the crops they plant, the debts they have developed comes out of their half of the money. This often leaves the sharecropper with nothing. Between the debt and the hard working conditions, a second form of slavery is created. It was not slavery with a person literally being owned but one of holding a person because they have no choice to go elsewhere. The landowners were the dominant persons in society while the workers were part of the lowest class." (Sharecropping, athena.english.vt.edu). From the reading, it seemed that Abner did not like his sharecropper living because he believed that this kind of life makes him exactly like the slaves owned by the rich and wealthy--and his resentment comes from there. As a result of…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the civil war ended, the freedmen of the south needed a way to get back into the fields and rebuild the southern economy. The Congress tried to give freed slaves their own little farm, but they were not ready to run one after working only in the fields all their lives. The way this problem was solved was with tenant farms. Freemen and former slaves were allowed to work in the fields of a landowner, and in return, they were supplied with food, shelter, clothes, seeds, and equipment. I don’t think tenant farms and sharecropping was a wise way to run the farming industry after the civil war. Though sharecropping was bad for many, it did benefit some people. It benefitted landowners for several reasons. Reason number one being they didn’t…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    d. Sharecropping was the practice of a tenant farming the landlords ground for a share of the crop sold when the harvest came in; it became a from on employment for former slaves in the post Civil War South. The economic impacts on the South overall were that the southern economy was tied to agriculture such as cotton production.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Civil War ended in December 1865, and the slaves were free. They hoped to be treated as equal citizens who could vote, gain an education and live peacefully and equally with the whites. Many former slaves did not want to work for wages because they would still have to do what they were told by the whites. The solution seemed to lay in sharecropping, but that proved wrong. Plantation owners broke up their land into small pieces upon which the former slaves could grow their own crops. In return for seed and equipment, the sharecropper would give the plantation owner a third or a half of his crop. This was just like slavery. This would still make the African Americans go back to work at plantations. Even though slavery was abolished sharecropping was just a loophole. This was another way to force blacks back into plantations.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This became a new of form of slavery in the South. Many problems emerged from sharecropping. Freedmen were forced into an unending cycle of debt. They had no money to buy tools or seeds, which caused them to borrow supplies from the landowners. The plantation owners got to pick how much they charged for the supplies and what crops they would plant. This took away their economic freedom, freedmen were no longer allowed to decide what they produced to make money. The plantation owners had control over their lives because they owed them money. They influenced their decisions and limited their ability to participate in society. If the plantation owner told them that they could not vote, then they would not. This shows how their lack of economic freedom contributed to the loss of their political freedom. Therefore, this proves that It is not possible to be politically free if you are not economically…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economic goals of a small slaveholder tended to vary depending on the slaveholder's location and environment. Although small slaveholders in the upland territories tended to be content with their smaller status, small slaveholders in the lower regions of the country tended to be more ambitious towards pursuing a greater economic status, such as that of a planter. Small slaveholders were dependent on the production of their slaves, and felt justified in the usage of slavery in order to turn a…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Populism In The 1890s

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The blacks were free, but very few could own lands. The white masters had landed but lack power over labor. To keep their ex-slaves, they came up with sharecropping. In this case, the black was given lands to rent and payback in the form of production share to the landowners. In this scheme, it was of importance to the landowners since almost all the Blacks wanted to tenant farmers while they were politically weak and economically unstable hence the landowners dictated them as demonstrated by Zieger.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Enclosure Essay

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The farmers who managed to enclose their land could have a number of benefits. First of all, the demand for their products increased significantly and that was reflected on their profit. Furthermore, they also had the possibility to charge higher rents to their tenant farmers which meant even a higher income for landowners with enclosures. Tenants were also benefited by this new system since they could easily get loans from the banks to get new machinery to use the new farming methods and this way they got a high income too. Even some labourers took advantage of this new system because some of them got a new house in the enclosed land.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gor Tex Case Study

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. Cooperatives and share-ownership schemes provide many attractions and benefits, but there are also limitations; discuss these.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Economics Land Reform

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages

    – by 1960, the problem of tenancy was far from being solved. Some 41% of all farms were cultivated by tenants as compared to 37% in 1948.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Engaging to involve private and public lands in the program, CARP fairly aimed to convert share tenants into own cultivators of lands. Public lands, on the other hand seek to institute land settlements where large farms could be payable to landless farmers.…

    • 6158 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays