Preview

Shareholder and Stakeholder Approaches

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1466 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shareholder and Stakeholder Approaches
Abstract

In this report, purposes of corporations are investigated under two different approaches on corporate value maximization: Shareholder Approach and Stakeholder Approach. So, firstly both approaches are defined briefly. Secondly, compare and contrast of shareholder and stakeholder approaches is made.
Keywords: Purpose, Corporation, Value Maximization, Shareholder Approach, Stakeholder Approach.

Shareholder Approach on Value Maximization:
Shareholder approach on value maximization focuses the corporation’s purpose on maximizing the wealth of owners by maximizing the profit while minimizing the importance of the other roles of corporation in the society. The origins of the ideas shaping shareholder theory are more than 200 years old, with roots in Adam Smith’s (1776) The Wealth of Nations. Smith’s three ideas are followed by modern supporters of shareholder approach,
1. The importance of ‘free’ markets;
2. The ‘invisible hand of self-regulation’ and
3. The importance of ‘enlightened self-interest’
Shareholder approach supporters defend the idea that excessive oversight and regulation of industry is unnecessary. Members of the ‘Austrian School’ of economics were early supporters of the shareholder approach. They advocated the idea of ‘leave alone’ capitalism, which focuses on the importance of self-regulation among firms, with limited government intervention.
Shareholder theory in its current form is linked most directly to the ‘Chicago School’ of economics, most notably to Milton Friedman and his colleagues, who have argued for nearly four decades that the overriding purpose of the firm is to maximize shareholder wealth. They believe solving social problems is the responsibility of the state. Friedman believed, in short, that the business of business is business. When firms become involved in social or public policy issues, wealth is diverted to issues outside the core expertise of their managers. This



References: 1. MITSloan Management Review - The Shareholders vs. Stakeholders Debate http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-shareholders-vs-stakeholders-debate/ 2. Michael D. Pfarrer. ‘What is the Purpose of the Firm?: Shareholder and Stakeholder Theories’, Good Business: exercising effective and ethical leadership, 2010, p.86- 92 3. Latha Chari and R. P. Mohanty, Understanding value Creation - The Shareholder Value Perspective

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUSLAWDIS7

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Chapter 35 discusses many concepts related to shareholders that you’ve probably heard in sound bites on the news. The concepts, however, are more important than mere sound bites as the ramifications for corporations, shareholder, and our economy are significant. As the intro to the Chapter illustrates, everyone is all too familiar with the rise and fall of Enron. Unfortunately, Enron is not the only corporation with management, shareholder, and earnings troubles.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the introduction of the first public company by Francis Cabot Lowell in 1814, the principal – agent conflict between stockholders and managers has existed. The Greed Cycle offers an exploration and analysis of the agency problems that exist between stockholders and managers as well as some of the mechanisms that have been used to reduce these problems. The following review will highlight the changing nature of the goal of the corporation, the relationship between agency problems and the goal of shareholder wealth maximization, successful and unsuccessful ways in which agency problems between managers and owners have been addressed, the relationship between agency conflicts and options given to managers, and thoughts regarding the ultimate goal of the corporation.…

    • 867 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To put it simply, in financial terms, to maximize shareholders wealth means to maximize purchasing power. Throughout the years, we have learned that markets are most efficient when the company is able to maximize at the current share price. Every company’s main goal should be to strive to maximize its value to every single one of their shareholders. Common stock represents the value of the market price, and it also gives the shareholder an idea of the different investment, financing, and dividend decisions made by that particular firm.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stakeholders: Large Firms

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike shareholders who are solely interested in return dividends and share price growth, stakeholders have wide variety of interests in how companies operate. Freeman (1984) stated that stakeholders are, “any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization’s objectives”. The main objective for firms is profit maximization and for this reason I agree to a certain extent that large corporations abuse their power against stakeholders.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Friedman’s goal of the firm can be construed as selfish or greedy. Shareholder profits are important, but that is not the only social responsibility a company has. A company needs to conduct…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the non-Anglo-American markets, controlling shareholders also strive to maximize long-term returns to equity. However, they are more constrained by powerful other stakeholders. In particular, labor unions are more powerful than in Anglo-American markets. Governments interfere more in the marketplace to protect important stakeholder groups, such as local communities, the environment, and employment. Banks and other financial institutions are more important creditors than securities markets. This model has been labeled the stakeholder capitalism model (SCM) (Moffett, pg. 32). The SCM model weighs more in the favor of the long-term investor than those investors that are transient. The SCM model assumes that total risk, that is, operating and financial risk, does count. It is a specific-corporate objective to generate growing earnings and dividends over the long run with as much certainty as possible, given the firm’s mission statement and goals. Risk is measured more by product market variability than by short-term variation in earnings and share price (Moffett).…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Strategic Stakeholder Management A stakeholder is any individual, group, or organization that has an interest or concern or may be impacted as a result of an organization’s activities, objectives, policies, or products. Strong relationships between an organization and its stakeholders are critical to a company’s success. To effectively manage stakeholder relationships, an organization must understand the nature and composition of its stakeholder community and how stakeholder power and interest levels can influence strategy decisions and ultimately business outcomes.…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stakeholder Theory

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Stakeholder Theory is defined as having three dimensions. The first dimension is that the stakeholders must contribute valued resources to the firm. The second dimension is how the stakeholders use these resources and the risks involved that could affect the success or failure of the firm and the relationship with that firm if it is terminated. The third dimension deals with the power that the stakeholders have within the firm. While one can be considered a stakeholder by possessing one of these dimensions, it is essential to possess all three dimensions to be considered a true definitive stakeholder. This theory differs from the shareholder theory in that a shareholders primary duty is to maximize returns and deal with no other aspects of the company. Basically advocating profitability by any means necessary bringing in a very moral issue. Many believe the stakeholder theory seems to disregard the interests of the shareholders', however this point is misinterpreted because by using the stakeholder theory to ensure long-term sustainability of that company in itself takes account of the interests of the shareholders. Stakeholders' theory focuses on management decision-making whereas shareholder theory is more financially based decision-making.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro to Business

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Historically, the goal for them has been to maximize the value of the firm to its owners. But today’s businesses have adopted a broader perspective, believing that they have responsibilities not just to stockholders but also to customers, employees, and other stakeholders. Treating these other stakeholders well often builds value, which benefits stockholders, but other stakeholder groups also sometimes have goals that conflict with those of stockholders.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Porsche Changes Tack

    • 7668 Words
    • 31 Pages

    Vesi’s dilemma was whether Porsche—Porsche’s leadership—was increasingly pursuing shareholder wealth maximization or the more traditional Continental European model of stakeholder capitalism. Shareholder Wealth Maximization. The Anglo-American markets—the United States and United Kingdom primarily—have followed the philosophy that a firm’s objective should be shareholder wealth maximization. More specifically, the firm should strive to maximize the return to shareholders, as measured by the sum of capital…

    • 7668 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Over the last decade, with the rapid development of business management, the Shareholders who are the effective owners of the company invest money into the business and want as much profit as possible as a return for their investment. Shareholders will engage manager to help them to run the business and make various decisions in different aspects in order to maximize potential wealth. There seems to be no doubt that a manager has a legal responsibility to shareholders. However, if the manager only considers the interests of shareholders, will the business be successful for a long time? Therefore, the theory of stakeholder enters the public consciousness. This essay aims to explain in addition to the shareholder, why it is also necessary for a manager to demonstrate responsibility to the various stakeholders. An integrated and clear definition of stakeholder will be introduced in the first paragraph. The content will show that stakeholders play different significant roles to help the firm to reach the long-run benefits in the second paragraph. Last but not the least, the third part of this thesis will utilize a negative example to reveal the bad influence if a manager only shoulder the responsibility to shareholder.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Utilitarianism

    • 2287 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The origins ideas of shareholder theory were started by Adam Smith’s (1776) from the book “The Wealth of Nations” more than 200 years old. In brief, it surrounded the idea that the firm’s main purpose of is to generate profit and thus increase shareholder wealth.…

    • 2287 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of the unique position of shareholders as the owners of the company, satisfying shareholder claims typically receives the greatest attention in many corporate mission statements. However, should managers only pursue the interests of shareholders, while ignoring the claims of other stakeholders. Discuss.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shareholder V Stakeholder

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milton Friedman wrote, “There is one and only one social responsibility of business — to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition, without deception or fraud.” Friedman did not support firms acting illegally, unethically, or immorally; he believed the goal of firms was to maximize shareholder wealth within the legal boundaries of society. Government and citizens should assume their rightful roles by setting and maintaining those limits. Several concepts prove why the ethical responsibility of a corporation should be placed internally, on producing profit, rather than addressing social issues.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Donaldson, T., Preston, L. (1995). "The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications." Academy of Management Review 20: p. 65-91.…

    • 5316 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays