Preview

Should Antibiotics Be Freed From Farm Animal Feed?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
333 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Antibiotics Be Freed From Farm Animal Feed?
The FDA makes a strong point on why antibiotics should be eliminated from farm animal feed. The FDA uses expert testimony and scientific fact that show why antibiotics have more negative than positive effect. While, using antibiotics is cheaper, it is more important to be selective about which drugs are given to our animals.

There is clear information explaining why antibiotics are harmful to society so it is very important that we use these drugs properly. When bacteria gets into the food supply, it can also infect people because of the treated animals that are consumed. According to the FDA about eighty percent of the antibiotics sold in the United States are used in the meat sold in grocery stores. Unfortunately, little progress has been made to reduce the use of antibiotics on farms, where most of these drugs are
…show more content…
This practice is a convenient way for farmers to create more meat while using less feed in turn becoming a more cost-effective practice. The meat and poultry production industry argues, that there is no harm in this. However they hardly provide any evidence, making it seem like they are giving their opinion rather than caring about facts, even going as far as to fearmonger and convince readers that without antibiotics it will be impossible to meet America’s food needs. Considering the purpose of the article is to get readers to sign a petition this text has been written to safeguard the financial interests of livestock producers.

The FDA is only trying to do what is best Americans by fighting to ban antibiotics from animal feed. Although our livestock producers disagree and believe that it would be cheaper to use antibiotics in our animal feed, our health is more important. The bottom line is this isn’t something that should be ignored voluntary bans are a positive step forward in dealing with this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ffn Q and a

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The fast food industry has become a growing epidemic that has continued to grow. Because of this increase in the industry the way that meat is made has become more simple than ever. There are humongous machines that cut down all the parts of the meat however the problem is that the cattle as a result are treated brutally. Most of them are killed while still alive and are shocked with an electric rod and killed in an instant. The cattle business has become competitive and the way the cattle are treated has become worst each year.…

    • 1854 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next time you buy meats or vegetables from a corporate supermarket just think it may be loaded with antibiotics and/or harmful bacteria that may cause you to get sick or may even take your life, not to mention the inhumane or unhealthy conditions that the animals are kept in which in return pollute our air and water.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nmd-1 Research Paper

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The use of antibiotics in farm animals is to increase their weight; farm animals suffer from small infections throughout their lives treatment with antibiotics prevent this.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion, feeding livestock antibiotics in their feed, to make their growth rate rise rapidly, is…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    January 1st, 2017 all livestock producers, veterinarians, feed distributors and manufacturers had to be in compliance with the Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD).The Veterinary Feed Directive has affected the livestock industry to ensure medically important drugs are being used responsibly by producers, veterinarians, distributors, and manufacturers. This was implemented to assure consumers that livestock producers take good care of our animals while producing a healthy, wholesome food (Salfer, J,2015)…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Food and Drug Administration, or FDA for short, is a government agency responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices, our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, and products that emit radiation, and by regulating the manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products. The FDA is also responsible for advancing the public health by helping to speed innovations that make medicines and foods more effective, safer, and more affordable; and helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines and foods, and to reduce tobacco use to improve health (About FDA 1). I am deeply concerned about how the FDA is regulating food. In my opinion, the FDA is failing miserably with their duties to the citizens of the United States of America. They appear to be more interested in profit than with the overall well being of the public. They are allowing people to consume dangerous amounts of fluoride. Studies have shown that food additives are causing serious health related issues. I feel that the FDA needs a massive overhaul in their top-level leadership positions in order for them to improve.…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Env Science

    • 1383 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Meat is no longer the ‘pure animal’ that hunters used to catch, cook and eat. Over time, our animals have been altered in several different ways, in order to benefit the people, businesses and organizations that profit from producing meat in large quantities, at a much quicker pace. Today, farmers in this industry tend to induce the animals we eat with ‘steroid like’ hormones, to intensify the growth of the animals at a much higher rate. This speeds up the process of raising these animals, and helps the farmer’s product hit the market sooner and in a much bulkier state. This means more profit for the people who run these industries. But, should this situation be all about money? The reality is, like many other businesses, income is their main interest and a priority, regardless of the risks. And in this situation the risks they are taking affect the health of the consumers, the citizens of America. Author Kathy Koch wrote, “The U.S. government has declared that genetically engineered foods are as safe as foods developed through hybridization, but critics have doubts about the safety and need for transgenic, or genetically altered animals” (Koch, 1998). For this reason we must stop the contamination of these animals with unnatural chemicals like antibiotics and hormones before they can prove to damage the health of the people who consume them.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Remember that nice juicy steak you had for dinner last night, well chances are that, that steak contained antibiotics that are the cause of many of the superbugs in the news lately. There is a lot of controversy around the use of antibiotics in livestock and the risks or benefits of using it, but for the most part the risks outweigh the benefits. Our large corporate ranch in northwestern Montana should not use antibiotics in our feed because most of it wouldn’t help the livestock anyway, antibiotics are already over used, and there is a growing market for antibiotic free meat.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Inaccurate Animal Testing

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a result of this, nine out of every ten trial medicines that look safe and appear to be effective on animals, fail when they are given to humans. Because animals don’t react the same way as humans, not only do the failed tests delay medical progress, but also they are a waste of animal’s lives, and a waste of money that is spent into the research and tests. Animals have different anatomic, cellular, and metabolic structures than humans have. If a new product is passed just because it is safe on animals and isn’t on humans, that could be a very dangerous situation. One instance when this occurred was in 1950 when a sleeping pill worked on animals but when given to humans it caused 10,000 babies to be born with severe birth defects. Another time, a drug for arthritis was safe on mice but when administered to humans caused 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths. Animal testing can make researchers oversea potential cures and treatments. Some substances that are harmful to animals, are helpful to humans. For example, aspirin is dangerous to some animals. Arthur Allen says, “A source of human suffering may be the dozens of promising drugs that get shelved when they cause problems in animals that may not be relevant for humans.” (“Of Mice or Men: The Problems with Animal Testing”). Of all the medicines that pass animal trials and are ready for human…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there has been many advances in drugs and treatments for certain diseases and conditions due to animal testing, not all of them have been…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Against Animal Testing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This is true, but it overlooks that someone will still have to be the first human to test the product regardless. The Food and Drug administration requires some testing, but there are alternatives that cost less and take less time, and are more accurate than animal testing. Harvard's Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering has created “organs on chips” which are made with living human cells. These chips can replace animal testing in the future. Wyss researchers wrote on the organs-on-chips project page, "Clinical studies take years to complete and testing a single compound can cost more than $2 million. Meanwhile, innumerable animal lives are lost, and the process often fails to predict human responses." In conclusion, in order to end animal testing, it needs to be harder to violate the Animal Welfare Act and more appealing to consider alternatives. I wish to end with a quote by Professor Charles R. Magel, “Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because they are like us,’ ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: ‘Because the animals are not like…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Antibiotics are also used in livestock, which is then consumed by us and in turn increases the chances of strong bacteria thriving and not being killed off by the antibiotics (Ventola 2015).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Human Society International it states that 9/10 candidate medicines that appear safe and effective in animal studies fail when given to humans. This shows that every 10 experiments done on animals only 1 will work. This also shows that animals are being killed even if the experiment doesn’t work. In the UK an estimated 70,000 people are killed or severely disabled every year by unexpected reactions to drugs. All these drugs have passed animal tests (Human Society International). This shows that animal testing isn’t reliable if the medicines that are approved are killing people who are taking them. This is important because if the medicines are killing people that have been tested on animals, their should be a new way to make sure they’re safe.This shows that animal testing is useless and there should be another way to make sure drugs are safe before giving them to…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It’s bad science! The Food and Drug Administration reported that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail on humans, making it wasteful. In recent years there has been the recognition that animals rarely serve as good models for the human body. Animal experiments prolong the suffering of people waiting for effective cures by misleading experimenters and squandering precious money, time, and resources that could have been spent on human-relevant research.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays