Preview

Should Apple Use Iphone Data?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
530 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Apple Use Iphone Data?
Many debates between the company Apple and the Federal Bureau of Investigation about whether or not Apple should unlock the phone of Syed Farook, one of the San Bernardino attackers. Many say disrupting their privacy violates the fourth amendment, “No unlawful searches or seizures against any man, without a probable cause.” I highly believe this allows Apple to help the FBI to unlock the phone of the attackers. In the article, “PRO/CON: Should Apple have resisted FBI pressure to hack an iPhone?” By the Associated Press, the author disputes the reasons why Apple should unlock the of the San Bernardino attackers. In the article, “Should Apple help the FBI access iPhone data?” by Brian Mastroianni, the author discusses the ideas the FBI had to convince Apple to not make the wrong decision.
According to the Associated Press, the American Government acted quicker during past similar events. Immediately after the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the Government shut down factories to build wartime facilities. The author writes, “Their mission: to
…show more content…
Apple is worrying more about privacy than the real issue. The FBI says, “...this is less an issue of securing private data on a phone and more of ensuring that all of the crucial intelligence in this particular case is collected.” The author is saying, Apple does not understand what they are fighting against. They obviously believe disrupting Syed Farook’s privacy is the main issue. HE’S A TERRORIST! Does Apple not see the man has helped the Islamic State extremist group kill 14 innocent citizens and yet believe his privacy matters. The terrorist’ dead for god's sake. Yes, we all understand this is a violation of the fourth amendment, but guess what Apple, the FBI has a warrant which allows Apple to unlock the phone with no charges against them. It’s a quite a big issue when the FBI has a warrant and are still unable to access the data in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The supreme court case Carpenter v. United States is arising the question of whether the warrantless search and seizure of cell phone records revealing the movement of the user over the course of 127 days. After four people were arrested for a series of armed robberies, one confessed and gave his phone number as well as the others. As a result of this more chargers were placed on Carpenter for interfering with interstate commerce, because of the Hobbs Act. This case is using the fourth amendment and arguing that his phone being searched was an “unreasonable search or seizure”. I think that the US or FBI is right in this case, since Carpenter had already committed multiple armed robberies and the information was provided by another person who…

    • 184 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Binks Vs Mckay Case Study

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    On May 12, 2016 the court case Binks/McKay vs the United States challenged the idea of the Fourth Amendment. The case explains the situation between Binks and McKay, who claimed that the FBI violated their Fourth amendment rights when the FBI searched through their Facebook messages after being suspected of being terrorists. This occured when Binks and McKay were discovered to have been communicating with a supposed ISIS member. They had claimed to have no intentions of joining the terrorist group. In this case, Sam and Melanie (petitioners) reminded us that a warrant and reason for searching is a necessity when it comes to violating one’s right to privacy. However, court justices Danny and Nick both asked similarly: “Why do you think that violates their privacy?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How comfortable would you be with a government having access to your personal information and data on your phone? A recent incident involving a terrorist attack in San Bernardino, sparked a controversy between Apple and the Federal Bureau of investigation. Following the attack by two individuals committed an act of terror, killing 14 people, the iPhone belonging to one of the terrorists was found. As you may know, your organization is requesting the court for Apple's forced assistance in weakening the encryption on an IPhone related to the San Bernardino terrorist attacks and supposedly has vital information on it. These terrorist attacks were performed by ISIS's lone wolves, named Syed Rizwan Farook, who owns the phone and Tashfeen Malik, his wife. In my opinion, the phone shouldn't be cracked for three reasons. First of all because it undermines America's founding principles and it…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The argument being presented in the given piece is the FBI asking permission from Apple to have the ability to access people’s private messages in their apple products. This argument came into conversation after the terrorist attack in San Bernardino, California. The author’s claim towards the argument is that the FBI should not be able to have the ability to tap into people’s individual cell phones. Although the FBI’s idea of decoding Apple’s encryption code in order to gain access to tapping into all iPhones under service, it seems that the cons outweigh the pros of this certain situation. However, there has to be a completely different way the FBI can develop a better way to combat terrorism without interfering with all of Apple’s customers.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rescue efforts used at Pearly Harbor were very similar to tactics used after the 9/11 attacks on the Empire State Buildings. Sailors had been trapped in the sunken ships. Rescuers drilled through the walls of the ships to salvage the sailors. The Japanese were unable to destroy the morale of America. Work to repair…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 7th 1941, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because they were tired of negotiations with the United States. When Japan dropped the bomb on Pearl Harbor, it completely destroyed several American battleships. “Behind them left chaos, 2403 dead, 188 destroyed planes and a crippled Pacific Fleet that included 8 damaged or destroyed battleships” (“Pearl Harbor”). Of course, America responded quickly, “The day after the attack, before a joint session of Congress, President Roosevelt made his famous speech that labeled December 7 as ‘a date which will live in infamy’ (Curtis). It was a huge surprise that Japan could carry so many troops that far to another part of the globe and attack them without anyone knowing it. However, even if America had already responded to it immediately, they still couldn’t forget the humiliation from Japan, and that is why America dropped the atomic…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place…

    • 2530 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1940’s it was a crazy and brutal century. Pearl Harbor was bombed by the Japanese. The attack took at least a couple of hours long. The Japanese damaged at least 20 ships, destroyed over 150 planes, and killed over 2,000 people. Since Pearl Harbor had happen the United States had declared war on Japan. The government did not…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason is the Revolutionary War, this was a disagreement between Great Britain and the American colonies. The king himself had created a swamp of new buildings and offices. Hitler swamped and took them out. This is showing the colonies were in need of general searches. The British officers were just trying to received taxed goods. The next reason is Carroll v United States 1925. The United States supreme court was doing warrantless searches through automobiles. This is taking it too far, the US supreme court should not be able to go through somebody's vehicle without a warrant. There is no reasonable suspicion, this is just too far. Allowing Farook's Iphone to be unlocked allowed him to set up a terror attack. He was able to send drivers to locations and set up an attack. Apple took it too far and a chance of unlocking his Iphone to do…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On December 7, 1941 Japan’s plans succeeded with an attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Outraged President Franklin Roosevelt declared war with Japan the next day. With the United States fleet out of the way for the time being, Japan seized the opportunity and tried to take oil resources from Southeast Asia. The attack on Pearl Harbor turned America into a war production economy. Military needs were in demand and quickly took priority over consumer goods. After Pearl Harbor, President Roosevelt issued Executive Order 9066 in 1942, which allowed the military to relocate the Japanese to temporary centers in a precaution to protect American…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 4th Amendment is extremely important to our country. This amendment in the United States Constitution provides the right for people to be secure in their own person, paper, and home, protects against unreasonable search and seizures, and states that no warrant will be issued without probable cause. 4th Amendment laws are more strict than any other amendment, and leaves absolutely no wiggle room to allow changes. Despite these strict laws being in place the government is at war with Apple because Apple encrypts everything to make a very good security, and they say allowing the government into people's phones would be against the 4th Amendment. 4th Amendment laws are very important, and should be followed closely. The 4th Amendment helps…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The American colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain because of unjust laws, a King of tyranny, and both violating searches and officials. These things outraged the colonists in different ways. Forcing them to unite together and rebel against Britain, hence leading to Revolutionary War.…

    • 220 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Vietnam War was a war fought between Communist North Vietnam and anti-Communist South Vietnam. The main, intended goal from the United States perspective was to prevent the further spread of communism. In order to execute their goal, they sent troops to South Vietnam and established several bases. The U.S. assisted South Vietnam to push back the North Vietnamese. Although the U.S. pushed North Vietnamese back many times, they never succeeded in the end. The Vietnam War left several positive and negative outcomes.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fourth amendment is the right against unreasonable searches and seizures. It also requires a warrant and probable cause for the evidence to be seized legally unless other circumstances apply. Due to this amendment law enforcement cannot take evidence as they please, they must have a valid reason and even may require a search warrant. According to Find Law, “If a government actor conducts an illegal search (one that violates the Fourth Amendment), the government cannot present any evidence discovered during that search at trial. Known as the "exclusionary rule," this rule aims to deter police officers from conducting unreasonable searches. Opponents of the exclusionary rule, however, argue that it lets guilty criminals go free on technicalities.” There have been several cases which have been thrown out due to evidence gained illegally and guilty people have gotten to walk away free. I believe the fourth amendment is very important in the legal system and I also agree with how it has been implemented. I believe this amendment keeps law enforcement from invading other people’s privacy. A good example is, the fruit of the poisonous tree which was created to prevent the government and law enforcement from invading someone’s privacy by doing unreasonable searches which could also lead law enforcement to discover other evidence. The theory of this would be that law enforcement knowing that a certain evidence was collected illegally would get thrown out as evidence and this would hopefully deter them from conducting them…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine losing your son in this massacre and not even knowing all that you could know. This is what those families feel right now and if Apple could just help the FBI it could give many people substantiation. You would think that a big conglomerate like Apple would want to use all of their resources for good and try to help the FBI as much as possible. But, for some obscure reason that is not the case. When you kill innocent people you give up your right to privacy. If there is one message that should be given to Apple it is this: give the families the comfort and validity they need.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays