Preview

Should Capital Punishment Should Be Legalized Murder?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1116 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Capital Punishment Should Be Legalized Murder?
A great deal of people believe in the saying “an eye for an eye.” However, should anyone have the right to end another human's life? On one side people believe that the capital punishment is fair and will keep other people from committing the same crimes. On the other hand, people believe that capital punishment is unjust and is legalized murder. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty. Capital punishment is the “execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense.” Some of these crimes include aggravated first-degree murder, treason, espionage, large scale drug trafficking, etc. Capital punishment should be abolished.
Innocent people that were convicted and put to trial have died
…show more content…
John Donahue claims that “There is not the slightest credible statistical evidence that capital punishment reduces the rate of homicide.” One of the many reasons for capital punishment is because it is supposed to help decrease the crime rate in the United States taking the worst criminals from the streets. Not only is there no actual statistic that can prove that the death penalty is decreasing crime there also is no known statistic that it increases it either. On the death penalty information cite it is believed that “A 2009 study found that 88% of the nation’s top criminologists believe the death penalty is not a deterrent.” The known experts in the field of crime have determined that the crime rates have not decreased with the increase in the number of people on death row. However, opponents may say that even though crime doesn’t deter crime the horrible people on death row are no longer alive and are unable to hurt more people. While this is true giving criminal's life in prison can have the same effect as the death penalty. Not only is the death penalty repulsive the fact the crime rates aren’t affected in a positive way by the death penalty doesn’t help achieve one of the goals of capital …show more content…
Cornell law states that "In 1976, the Supreme Court held that the mandatory death penalty violates the Eighth amendment to the Constitution." The Supreme Court believes that each state should be able to decide whether the death penalty should be allowed in their state boundaries. Even though the supreme court believes this the death penalty is a violation of the eighth amendment because it prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is cruel and unusual. Capital punishment is unusual because most developed countries in Western Europe have abolished the death penalty, but the United States continues to implement it. An example of how the death penalty is cruel is because in 2014 in the state of Arizona Joseph Wood was given a lethal injection it took him nearly two hours to die witnesses said that “he gasped and struggled to breathe for about 1 hour and 40 minutes.” In many cases people have gotten the wrong doses for the .However, most opponents could say that the person that was violated or murdered got their human right taken away, so they don't deserve human rights either. People should not get to pick and choose who deserves to live and die it is within every person's right to live no matter what the crime

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Opponents of the practice most often utilize moral or legal grounds as the basis for their arguments or in some cases a combination of the two. Most often cited in the arguments against the use of the death penalty are the contentions that the use of the death penalty constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This argument is the one which was used in the 1972 case of Furman v. Georgia which alleged that Georgia’s death penalty statutes constituted cruel and unusual punishment and led to a temporary moratorium on the use of the death penalty until state legislatures came up with concise procedures, in the words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Warren Burger, “legislative bodies may seek to bring their laws into compliance with the Court’s ruling by providing standards for juries and judges to follow in determining the sentence in capital cases or by more narrowly defining the crimes for which the penalty is to be imposed” (Banner…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty violates the eight Amendment of the United States Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment. John M. Sheb and John M. Sheb II wrote in their book Criminal Law and Procedure that the eight amendment of the United States Constitution has been employed to limit the definition of crime. The authors mentioned the case of Robinson v. California where the Supreme Court, relying on the cruel and unusual punishment clause, found it unacceptable the state law that made crime the use of narcotics. The law was struck down because the Court determined that one couldn’t be punished merely for status without committing a criminal act (Sheb, 70-71). The Death penalty practices serve to be inconsistent with the fundamental laws and values in America’s democratic system.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Less than a year ago a man from Canada checked if Illinois still used the death penalty. When he found out they did not, he murdered a woman. The question that people ask is if the death penalty was still in effect would she still be alive? The Eighth Amendment bars cruel and unusual punishment. In the case Glossip v. Gross they said lethal injections did not violate the Amendment. In a lengthy dispute Justin Stephen Breyer argued that it is time for a “full meeting on a more basic question: does the death penalty violate the Constitution? Since 2007 seven states have abolished capital punishment. According to a news reporter, Kent Faulk, Ronald B. Smith was still slightly conscious when they gave him his lethal injection. Smith was gasping for breath, heaving, and coughing for 13 minutes. The people that inject the prisoner need to make sure the person is unconscious first. The death penalty is wrong and it should no longer be…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Phil 1112 Death Penalty

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “An eye for an eye,” right? As fair as America tries to be, sometimes we also have to remember that an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. Many people rave about how the death penalty is an unjust punishment and that we can do without it; the idea of killing someone so that the punishment fits the crime is what shows how our world and societies are just as cruel as the criminals in it. The death penalty debate is a dispute that is learning to become more immoral and becoming a less used tactic when penalizing criminals. This problem has decreased significantly over the last couple decades but the controversy is still up in the air nearly everywhere. Additionally, much of the controversy has a heavy influence on biomedical research due to the fact that lethal injection is highly used for execution purposes. Currently many professionals are looking for other forms of punishment, yet there are still many people who believe that this is a fair and equal punishment. Regardless of which side one is on, both perspectives offer good reasoning to why or why not the death penalty should continue to stay in effect. Althought I do not agree with the death many and it’s many consequences, I understand the reason for it being so controversial.…

    • 1930 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    8th Amendment Essay

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has generated a considerable amount of debate and controversy surrounding the question: what is considered “cruel and unusual punishment.” The important issue that develops from this amendment is whether or not the death penalty is constitutional. Over the decades, the Supreme Court fails to completely confront the issue by refusing to address any issue that falls outside of the case in question. As a result, today’s court is left with many specific instances where the death penalty is acceptable or unconstitutional, but not an overall principle that the death penalty is consistent or inconsistent with the Constitution. In Roper v. Simmons, seventeen year-old Christopher Simmons is tried as an adult…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States Constitution allows for some form of capital Punishment. Under the eighth Amendment no person shall and ever will be deprived of life without due process of the law. Over the past few centuries the words cruel and unusual punishment have changed. When legislators created the Eighth Amendment, they did this for no criminal to be treated as wrong as they treated their victim. The United States Constitution allows us to interpret that a man can be executed, but in the most humane possible. According to the article “ The Death Penalty Does Not Violate The U.S Constitution.” It says “The US Constitution specifically allows for the death penalty to be imposed as a criminal sanction, and democratically elected legislatures—not court…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    How can we expect killing to stop when we kill in response to a crime? The death penalty has been giving out to criminals all around the world for a variety of crimes but it never seems to solve any problems or make anything better. The death penalty should not be allowed because it proves to be unsubstantial and has not shown or made any improvements is criminal activity.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court ruled that the death penalty is not a violation of the Eight Amendment’s ban on cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is when a convicted criminal is put to death by the court. The execution method may not inflict unnecessary pain on the criminal. The criminal sentenced to death can wait several years or sometimes decades on death row before being executed.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should the Death Penalty be allowed in the United States? What are some pros and cons of the death penalty? Some believe that the death penalty is a clever idea, however; I feel the death penalty is a very harsh punishment. The paragraphs below will explain in detail why I am against the death penalty. The cost of having criminals on death row versus life in prison, the mentally ill criminals, and the unfairness to the criminals.…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in the U.S. has been and continues to be a controversial debate between citizens. Debate regarding the policies, laws and if the death penalty is the best way to punish offenders who commit violent crimes. The history of the death penalty in the United States dates back to the late 1970s. Between 1968 and 1977 there were no executions in the United States. In the Supreme Court case of Furman v. Georgia, the court ruled that capital punishment, as it currently employed on the state and federal level is unconstitutional (Jones, 2006). The Eighth Amendment states that any form of capital punishment qualifies as “cruel and unusual punishment.” The use of executions during this time was primarily based on race and was considered by the Supreme Court as “arbitrary and capricious.”…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The major issue concerning the death penalty is the execution of innocent victims. Though humans are known to make mistakes, when it comes down to taking away someone’s right to live, mistakes cannot be made. According to The National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP), “143 individuals have been exonerated--that is, found to be innocent and set free. In other words, for every 10 people who have been executed since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, ONE person has been set free”. These are not just numbers, but the lives of innocent human beings being taken away. Drastic and risky…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is often the subject of controversy and it is certainly a tough topic.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    stoning to death, the stones should not be so large that the person dies on…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics for debate. I believe in capital punishment/death penalty and here is why. In the US we make valid arguments that center around the justifications of fairness, retribution, deterrence, economy, and popularity. The death penalty isn 't discriminatory and doesn’t violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as proven in In McCleskey v. Kemp (1987). Executions deter would‐be criminals from committing crimes.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays