Their hard work and dedication is traded for the honor of representing their school and shining in their sport. Some athletes will always be labeled with a higher regard than others, but the work ethic and dedication of a college athlete cannot be discounted. With the glory of the win and thrill of the games, athletes must abide the regulation guidelines. Student-athletes need to follow the rules the NCAA has set for them or they could lose their scholarship or eligibility to perform their sport and may have to leave their…
“Do college Sports Affect Students Grades? A Defense of the NCAA” by Megan Greenwell argues about whether college sports affect grades of the student-athletes or regular students and whether colleges would be better off without collegiate sport.…
In my opinion, I believe that college should not allow degrees in sports because it can limit job opportunities. Scholarships should only be use to recruit players. Then they should search for a backup plan, and those classes could be used to boost an athletes GPA to keep their eligibility for playing their…
Universities and NCAA Division I athletic programs are closely connected in many ways. One of the main ways these two are connected is based on finances. There are several financial positions that are established. While all points display problems with the finances, these perspectives are different problems. One perspective is that financial spending is usually not self-sustainable with rising costs, showing a need to use as many resources as possible to keep the programs alive. Some think that the limit of resources should be better distributed to academic spending. Some think that there are resources that are available for students to be paid as employees. My position is that some spending should be cut away from athletics, as it is proven…
Some colleges make more money than others. This graph shows the schools with the most profit in their sports programs. Somebody could say that the athletes bring in an enormous amount of money. According to Jeff Dorfman, a professor of Economics at the University of Georgia, only a few collegiate sports actually bring in money. Therefore, an athlete in a sport that isn’t very profitable wouldn’t make nearly get as much as an athlete in a very profitable sport. Along with the sports being very profitable they also have to pay for an even larger variety of different things. Student athletes should not be paid because of the money that would be paid to them. The money that they would be paid could be used to advance other things in the university such as better libraries, science labs, fixing up the dorms, or even improving their athletic facilities. Although the athletes put a lot of time into their schooling and sports the benefits they are given is equal to what they are giving and being…
For many students, the college experience is measured by the success of their NCAA-sanctioned athletic programs. Without the experience and athletic performance the student athlete brings, most colleges would not reap the benefit of these significant revenue-generating activities. At best, current NCAA regulations need to be revisited to ensure all avenues are addressed to enable the success of athletic students both in the classroom and on the field or court of play. As stated previously, even though students receive full and partial scholarships determined by their athletic performance, in both instances financial hardship is still experienced by many. Since the various professional sports’ programs reap the conditioning and experience of college student athletes, sponsorship initiatives should be pursued to allow student athletes some form of payment without creating additional outlays for colleges and universities.…
We often look at college athletes as miniature stars. The question is, why should student’s athlete get a paycheck for playing amateur level sports? Athletes complain about how they do not get enough for playing a sport. They are forgetting that they are being rewarded with a half or full scholarship. The main goal for these athletes is being academically successful. Not who has the best jump shot or who fumbled a ball, that does not matter. The essence of playing college level has been taken out of place, now replaced with the mindsets of professional athletes. Did they forget? You are not professionals. The love of the game has been through extortion for the love of money. Paying college athletes will lead the students astray from what they attended the institution to accomplish in the first place, that is, to earn a degree, not to gain a compensation.…
“The college sports industry generates $11 billion in annual revenues. Fifty colleges report annual revenues that exceed $50 million. Meanwhile, five colleges report annual revenues that exceed $100 million,” (Mitchell & Edelman). The money collected by the NCAA, goes towards the sports and the programs, not the players themselves, however, the NCAA says that “Student-athletes are at the heart of the NCAA’s mission,” (NCAA). “Some athletes and their supporters believe that college athletes deserve some type of financial payment for their services and contributions to their institutions, an opinion that has lead to player-initiated lawsuits, court cases, and strikes,” (Garcia).…
This past June marked the 40th anniversary of Title IX, a United States law stating that no person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. Although the wide spectrum in which Title IX covers includes many educational issues, its application to NCAA athletics has especially been confounded, because, unlike most educational institutions, athletic programs are gender-segregated by sport. In terms of intercollegiate athletics, Title IX essentially states that that all academic institutes of higher education are required to accommodate students with equal access to athletic participation, regardless of gender. This means that the overall number of athletic teams, scholarships, athletes, quality and quantity of athletic facilities, access to academic resources, access to physical treatment, along with an abundance of additional goods, services and resources offered by school’s athletic departments must be equal between men’s and women’s athletics. After forty years of this law being instated, it is evident that Title IX has accomplished its goal of providing equal opportunity to female athletes in collegiate athletics. However, unintentional negative outcomes have stemmed from this law, and is thus no longer acting in a positive manner for NCAA and should therefore be amended.…
In 2014, the NCAA had a gross revenue of about one billion dollars, distributing 547.1 million dollars to D1 schools. The money that D1 schools rake in from athletics is about 79% of their total income per year and helps them improve their respective school in academics, extracurricular activities, research, clubs and societies, and a multitude of other areas. Unfortunately, the athletes that bring in all this money receive absolutely no revenue and are essentially treated like slaves so that the school can prosper. Even though many people would argue that athletes should play the sport for the love of the game, their commitment, sacrifice of education, and risk of injury or permanent damage suggest they should get some compensation for their performance.…
A possible negative effect of paying collegiate athletes would be a decrease in competition. People believe college athletes should get paid as if it were a job, although this will create issues between rich and poor schools (Griffin 18). The rich colleges will have the opportunity to obtain the best athletes, causing the poor schools to not be as competitive. This issue makes the sports less competitive and entertaining, making fans less interested (Griffin 18). Since football and basketball bring in the most money, other college sports will not be able to be funded due to drawing in number one players to play football and basketball (Griffin 18). Most popular sports are men’s sports, therefore creating less…
The author describes athletes special circumstance through information that explains how scholarships work to appeal to readers empathy. He states that scholarships are awarded on a year-to-year basis that can be revoked if athletes are injured or underperform. This reason to feel persuades the reader to reconsider their opinion on the controversy because it challenges the misconception that most student hold which is that athletes get scholarships for their four years. It allows readers to feel sympathy towards an athlete’s situation because they are obligated to maintain athletic performance that satisfies their coaches along with academic eligibility to prevent their scholarship termination. Because readers are students and they understand how time much college courses alone require from their own experience, they are likely to understand how much work athletes put into their academics and sport performance. Similarly, the description of the athletic scholarships ensures students that athletes are held accountable and that money is not just thrown away. The assertion the article provides, that coaches are ensuring that athletes are upholding their academic requirements, eases readers to consider the possibility of paying athletes because that money would also be monitored. The combination of the newspaper’s explanation on how scholarships work along student's knowledge and experience about sustaining their grades increases readers support for the article’s…
Over the years college athletics have grown dramatically. Between all of the sports there is an unbelievable amount of money made for the school. Football, mens basketball, and women’s basketball are the top sports for bringing in money. While those are the top three, they aren’t the only ones to bring in money. Every sport contributes especially if they are a winning team. Athletes struggle everyday with getting their schoolwork done and being on time to class, managing time between work, school, and sports, and it is hard for them to maintain a healthy lifestyle with little time for everything. Many believe that athletes at the college level deserve some sort of benefits whether it be, getting paid, receiving less homework, more class time, etc… Even though many people are for this, a lot of people are also against the thought of giving them more benefits.…
A big part of college is athletics. For some schools its all about the team. Some even choose to attend a school based on their sport of choice. Many students would not even be in college were it not for athletic scholarships. But should colleges offer athletic schlarships? Looking from both view points there are many reasons why colleges should offer athletic scholarships such as diversifying the school and giving somone a chance who wouldnt normally have one. From the viewpoint that they shouldn't…
College sports provide a huge source of the universities' income. The school takes in money from ticket sales, television contracts, and sport-related merchandise, just to name a few. The athletes, however, receive their scholarship and little more. While the prospect of receiving a free college education is something few would complain about, when the issue is more closely examined it becomes evident that it is not enough. The trend for athletes is to leave school early for the professional leagues because of the money. There have been more reports of violations surrounding university boosters and alumni paying players. Furthermore, athletes have been accused of making deals with gamblers and altering the outcome of games. All of these problems could be minimized, by adopting a program for compensating student athletes. College athletes are exploited by their schools, which make millions of dollars off of them. The NCAA and professional leagues can work together to institute a plan to compensate these athletes and remedy all these problems. (165)…