Should Daredevils Be Defended From Everest?
Should Daredevils be Defended from Everest?
Do you think people who put themselves at risk deserve to have people come and save them, when it could possibly take the lives of the rescuers? When people go mountain climbing, there are many challenges, such as weather and terrain. Commonly, rescue helicopters go in and out every day to save people. All climbers vary in skill, age, and physical fitness. Most of them also research the conditions early, to make sure they are suitable for climbing. After considering various sources, an obvious stance can be reached. People have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at risk, because there can be many unforseen circumstances, and the helicopters they use to rescue are very reliable. …show more content…
Source #2 titled “ Why Everest?” proposes that there are some things climbers cannot do anything about. As stated clearly, “...there can be traffic jams...can suffer exposure and use their precious supplies of oxygen.” This displays the fact that climbers cannot do anything about this, and if they are not rescued, they could die without it even being their fault. This would perhaps cause the families of the climbers to pursue legal battles, and the national park could conceivably lose money. Those who disagree think that staff could control the levels of climbers, but the climbers outnumber the staff by a lot, and it would be very hard to communicate fast enough to control the climbers.Therefore, unforseen circumstances is the first reason people have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at
Do you think people who put themselves at risk deserve to have people come and save them, when it could possibly take the lives of the rescuers? When people go mountain climbing, there are many challenges, such as weather and terrain. Commonly, rescue helicopters go in and out every day to save people. All climbers vary in skill, age, and physical fitness. Most of them also research the conditions early, to make sure they are suitable for climbing. After considering various sources, an obvious stance can be reached. People have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at risk, because there can be many unforseen circumstances, and the helicopters they use to rescue are very reliable. …show more content…
Source #2 titled “ Why Everest?” proposes that there are some things climbers cannot do anything about. As stated clearly, “...there can be traffic jams...can suffer exposure and use their precious supplies of oxygen.” This displays the fact that climbers cannot do anything about this, and if they are not rescued, they could die without it even being their fault. This would perhaps cause the families of the climbers to pursue legal battles, and the national park could conceivably lose money. Those who disagree think that staff could control the levels of climbers, but the climbers outnumber the staff by a lot, and it would be very hard to communicate fast enough to control the climbers.Therefore, unforseen circumstances is the first reason people have the right to rescue services when they put themselves at