Preview

Should First Amendment Be Applied Differently To Celebrities

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
707 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should First Amendment Be Applied Differently To Celebrities
"Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or Abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble. And to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (U.S. Cost).
Should celebrities be allowed to say whatever they want? Should the rights of the First Amendment be applied differently to celebrities? Celebrities, like all of us should be able to voice their political opinions, but unlike the majority of us, celebrities have an enormous platform and with this platform, celebrities can bring a greater audience to controversial issues and bring about change. The power of celebrity’s voices can be seen in current events as well as the 1968 Summer Olympics Black Power Salute, Jada Pinkett Smith, Colin Kaepernick, and Meryl Streep.
At the 1968 Summer Olympic Games, after winning gold and bronze medals, Tommie Smith and John Carlos
…show more content…
DeMille Award for outstanding contributions to the world of entertainment. In her speech, Streep talked about an incident that happened on Trumps campaign trail in South Carolina when publicly mocked a disabled reporter. Streep's speech made more people aware of the incident, without her speech, many would still be ignorant of the matter.
Celebrities should be able to voice their political opinions. They can bring a greater audience to controversial issues and bring about change. Not only should we remember that actors are people, with feelings and opinions rather than robots. Celebrities are not just for our entertainment and it's important to acknowledge that factor. Celebrities, like all of us should be able to voice their political opinions. In fact, because of their enormous platform and ability to reach a big audience, I believe they have an obligation to use their First Amendment Rights

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    4. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion (the establishment clause) “or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” (the free exercise clause). These clauses guarantee freedom of religion through the separation of church and state.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    APUSA Case Study

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The Establishment clause for the First Amendment says, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”,…

    • 1726 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eposito Case

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most jealously protected speech is that which advances the free, uninhibited flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern; that which is addressed to matters of private concern, or focuses upon persons who are not "public figures", is less stringently protected. (Esposito-Hilder v SFX Broadcasting, Inc., 2007)…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Let 's not downplay that current market situations indicate that celebrity endorsement advertising strategies can indeed justify the high costs under the right circumstances. However, the importance of a company and the duty that it has to protect its image and reputation that solidifies its brand. By ignoring allegations and credibility issues that are raised by the public regarding a specific celebrity endorser a company does their brand a disservice that can easily affect their bottom line and their message. That is why a company often does not differentiate between an accusation and a guilty verdict when it comes to the credibility of their endorser. This can cost a company millions of dollars. Because of this companies are depending more and more on a moral clause to protect them in endorsement contracts.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I believe congress shouldn't restrict freedom of speech and freedom of press during times of war, because not only have we earned the right to speak our minds, it is also against the first amendment. The first amendement allows individuals to voice their opinion on the issue at hand, which is also a way to inform others. In addition, freedom of press is another way to inform the public of crucial matters, as well as providing information on the subject; however, at times the media can turn the matter into a joke. An example of this is SNL's portrayal of Republican nominee, Donald Trump, during the second presedential debate. In the sketch, SNL mocked him by portraying him as a hypocrite and a supremacist due to his responses to questions asked…

    • 171 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Celebrities exploitation

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Celebrities are widely considered the most influential people of the 21st century, possibly exceeding the pertinence possessed by famous politicians and religious leaders. Celebrities alone embody the means to win over countless of hearts with their charismatic winsome looks or unique characteristic skills. The extensive power that these celebrities hold therefore leads us to ponder: Do these personalities exploit their position in society to only offer nothing in return? Personally, I believe that celebrities are cognizant of their leveraging influence and by no means exploit them. However, I must disagree that celebrities offer nothing in return to our society. There are copious reasons behind my opinion and this statement will aim to elucidate the basis for my argument.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One perk of living in America is that it gives us a freedom of speech. Some people wisely use this, other abuse it. For instance, currently there are riots going on all over our country because they do not believe that Donald Trump should be president. These people are allowed to say what they think without any harsh penalties, but is this the proper way to use it. Another way this is used is through the nominee of running for president. Many times Donald Trump mocked people and said what he wanted in front of millions of people. If he was anywhere that did not have freedom of speech, he would have been arrested. He was also allowed to say what he thought was wrong with the country and how he is going to change it. At the same time this is…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thirdly, when these so called “celebrities” are invited to speak to the press, they are often asked different kind of questions by various journalists which tends to put them in various kind of trouble as in most cases their words are usually twisted.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our first argument is ‘Celebrities do have a moral responsibility towards society’. Celebrities nowadays are everywhere, from television to your doorstep. Their approach is becoming stronger towards the general population/audience by the simultaneous diversification of the media. Therefore it can be said that due to their constant presence in and around our lives the audience also tends to keeps tabs on them. Everyone who follows the celebrity will know everything about them and that’s why celebrities are under scrutiny all the time. Now because of that scrutiny those celebrities become role models for the people who are watching their every move (especially younger generation). So whether the celebrities like it or not, they are and always…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Celebrity Phenomenon

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I take the view, and use supporting evidence, that the celebrity phenomenon is nothing more than a creation for the benefit of few at the expense of many. When stripped to the core, a celebrity is a person just like you and me, except that through avenues to fame and public view has earned the title celebrity. As a result celebrity worship makes as much sense as that of worshipping the next-door neighbor or staff attendant at the local store. It may be true that a celebrity has more influence than that of the comparison, however, this influence on society and certain members of the public is not warranted.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    for and against

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Besides, paying more attention to expose the personal lives of famous people in the public is immoral. Walaski(2013) states that everybody has the right to keep the privacy. To over…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Their private lives, more than ever, are portrayed and somewhat painted through the lenses of mass media. The media do not hesitate to ludicrously invade celebrities’ personal lives. They should be treated as normal citizens who have every right to attain privacy over the ungainly scrutiny of the public. The most personal details of their lives are splashed all over the front pages of the Globe. Even a celebrity's family is hauled into the spotlight which I think is too bad. Although they might be Julia Roberts mother, or George Clooney's daughter, they are still people. They become a celebrity in some way just by being related to them, even though they might not want to be one. The spotlight seems to shine most on family when the celebrity has a secret. For example, there getting married or there having a baby, or is doing something critics do not approve of. It doesn't matter if the details are from your past or present, critics exaggerate those details, and make them known to the world. The information that gets spread tends to make people form strong opinions on the celebrity. When celebrities try to do things normal people do, like eat out or attend a football game, they run the risk of being interrupted by thoughtless autograph hounds, or mobbed by aggressive fans.…

    • 589 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bla Bla

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most disputable questions in our time is “Should the celebrity scandals in the press be banned”. Many people think that the tabloids shouldn’t write about the private life of the film and music stars. For example: when Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston got married, all tabloids wrote stories about their private life. The journalists made up a lot of them. As a result of that they split up.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Press Freedom

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the flip side of the coin, however, a person will only receive respect once he/she has earned it. Whether the press receives this appalling amount of freedom or not, a person’s exemplary character will always save him/her from disgrace. If politicians and celebrities really deserve to be in the positions that they are in (most of them are role models to young people) they should earn that respect by living up to the name and not making wrong moves that will make headlines for all the…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays