Dr. Victor Frankenstein, he is the most famous “mad scientist” of all times. Even though in the novel Frankenstein, he is hardly mad or evil. Victor is a complex character in the novel that can’t be defined as either hero or villain, because in the novel, he shows qualities that make him good and bad. The motives of Dr. Frankenstein are a mix of containing greater knowledge and pursuing the greater good, and personal ambition. He shows the good in him by working endlessly and putting a lot of effort in his experiments. However, when the creature comes to life, that is overshadowed. Dr. Victor Frankenstein, a man with great dedication and good intentions, but with a mixture of different motivations and…
Frankenstein is a novel book in which the mistake of Victor leads to the death of his loved ones. A scientist decides to interfere in the plans of nature and nature represented by the creature severely punishes him for that. Only “God” should take responsibility of creating a human form of life. Victor and the monster both die.…
Frankenstein creating the monster starts off bad and it only goes even further downhill from there. What the monster does throughout the story is very unethical and not very moral, but its actions can be explained by learning about what Victor did to create the mess. When he created the monster and then left it, he put everyone who was close to him in danger and never owned up to the fact that it was his fault. He let innocent people die because of this and when he could have explained that he created the monster, he decided to stay silent. The bad ethics are even further displayed through secondary characters who judge the monster based on social norms and its looks. In a book of unethical and unmoral events, Shelley decided to place in an ethical and moral character: Robert Walton. He is the epitome of a great man based on his actions. This book was filled with unethical decisions that could have been prevented if the monster was never…
Many people are indecisive over who is the true monster in the novel of Frankenstein, written by Mary Shelly. There are some people who believe the Monster that Victor creates is the true monster in this story. Others have gathered evidence that defends the Monster, and puts Victor Frankenstein in the position of being the villan. In this novel, Victor is shown as a selfish man in which generates a creature, whom he eventually chases off, due to his own fears. The Monster runs off scared and afraid, but soon finds his way back to Victor, in hopes of finding a companion. The Monster places his actions in a sympathetic light, and shows Victor Frankenstein to be both responsible for the events in the book and morally flawed as a character.…
Frankenstein’s creation should be considered an anti-hero because although the monster does not portray pure morals, it has concealed intentions covered with emotional complexities. After Frankenstein abandons his own creation, the monster shows its genuine and noble side by attempting to create a friendship with the old man and his family. Although the monster was charged out of the house, it exemplifies the ideals of a “flawed hero” on the monster, showing its honest attempts to become apart of the human race even if he is shunned out of the rest of society.…
Thomas Hobbes believes men are naturally evil and in this sense the monster was evil because he was made that way. This is illustrated in Hobbes quote, “there is no place for industry; because the fruit thereof is uncertain; and consequently no culture of the earth; navigation, nor use of the commodities that may be imported by sea; no commodious building; no instruments of moving, and removing, such things require much force; no knowledge of the face of the earth; no account of time; no arts; no letters; no society; and which is the worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death; and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (37). Despite the monsters misfortunes, such as killing all of Frankenstein’s loved ones, he…
I believe that The creature can be considered human because, he has the same great emotions just like humans he understands pain and he knows what it is like to be miserable for the sake of himself, he has developed great knowledge over the years and has begun to understand the purpose of humans, he has understand the emotions of himself and others, he should be considered human because of his knowledge with that, he shouldn't be left behind without a specific purpose besides for the way that he looks. Over the years of being miserable he had understand the meaning of happiness when he had seen the man and the couple that had all lived together in a cabin, the had showed happiness to each other, the creature knew what it was like to be miserable, but he did not see them acting the way that he was acting which made him change his emotion on how he saw things, besides thinking about Victor, he knew that was how you would treat someone, because Victor had never treated him that when the family had showed kindness to each he felt a warm welcome…
Frankenstein's Monster is a tangible representation of evil being created. Humans are solely responsible for the evidence of evil, primarily based off how they treat each other. Originally, the Monster embodies a childlike naivety which causes him to be completely unaware of his status as "an abhorred monster" (Shelley 92). Completely isolated from society, the Monster still develops a sense of self awareness which leads to the revelation of his loneliness. Desperate to cure his emotional pain, the Monster observes a family from afar and envies their happiness and connectedness. Eventually, he "hoped to meet the beings who, pardoning my outward form, would love me for the excellent qualities which I was capable of unfolding" (Shelley 196), and receive companionship and love from his ideal future friends. At this point, the Monster is clearly not evil, rather just an innocent being seeking the same validation that most humans strive to find.…
What makes a monster? Is monstrosity purely physical or is monstrosity a term used to denote immoral behavior? However one chooses to answer this question one must inevitably speak about the “monster” in relation to other beings in a given society at a particular time. In this essay I attempt to not only capture the “monster” as an engineered body, but also highlight the connection and possible tension between scientific knowledge and the morality of scientists and society during the Scientific Revolution/Enlightenment period. Traveling back in time to the 1700’s I will show readers that all that is needed to create a monster is an engineer, parts, a spark, society and a little science. Lastly, I will reflect on how advancements in science…
He does not think anything bad will happen if he creates a monster, just that he will be recognized as an amazing scientist. After creating the monster, he runs away, causing the monster to become evil. He lets Justine take the accusation of killing William when he knows that the monster was the one who did it. He does not want to get in trouble for creating an evil monster that kills people. Throughout the entire novel all Frankenstein does are things that would benefit him, even if it gets other people…
As I read the book,” Frankenstein” by Mary Shelly, I felt like the monsters violence was unjustified. His violent out burst were for revenge. When the monster didn’t get a female companion it made him angry and sad. He cant get any one remotely like him. No one to know what he feels on the day to day basis. But that doesn’t give him the right to kill or hurt people. He killed William, Elizabeth, and Henry; just to get back at Victor. That’s a perfect example on how unjustified the monsters actions were. He shouldn’t have felt justified to take someone’s life, bit since he felt alone he wanted everyone around him to feel what he felt every second of his life. The monster just wanted to feel like a normal being in a world full of differences.…
Victor Frankenstein abandoned the creature as soon as he created it which led to the creature being the way he is now, acting destructive but on the inside, truly nice. It could be argued that the monster’s nature was to kill, as Victor Frankenstein created him as an adult, and did not…
Throughout the novel Frankenstein, many people view the creation as the monster, which on the surface is what we are seeing by reading this text. However, as pointed out by writer Josh Traynelis, by reading into the text and digging out the small details provided in the reading, people begin to believe that maybe the creator is in fact the one that deserves to be called the monster. As pointed out in “Who’s the Real Monster?” by Traynelis, “Instead it was the extreme misconceptions of humans, resulting in extreme isolation of the creature, that caused him to become a monster,” where the isolation of the creature mainly draws back to the rejection of the creator and mankind (Traynelis, 1). The creator seemed to be disappointed with his creation,…
Frankenstein not only literally created the creature, but his reaction to his “birth” and subsequent neglect and abuse essentially created the psychological monster. From the moment of animation, Frankenstein was disgusted and repulsed by his creation. Rather than accept his child as he created, he abandons his newborn and all of his parental responsibilities. He never questioned where his abandoned child was and he even wished that the creature were dead. He continually refers to him as a “monster”, “fiend”, “demon” in a verbally abusive…
In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the creation of a second monster leads to the destruction of Victor Frankenstein’s health. The monster is tired of not being accepted by the human species, and demands Victor creates a female monster companion for him. The monster pleas and reasons for hours about why Victor owes it to him to create a female companion, and Victor finally gives in. He agrees on the condition that the monster must abandon the territory forever, which Victor must believe will put a cease to the destruction of his own health: “I consent to your demand, on your solemn oath to quit Europe forever, and every other place in the neighbourhood of man, as soon as I shall deliver into your hands a female who will accompany you in your exile”…