says, “Excellent officials may find themselves in poor position to see how a particular play unfolds, or simply miss a call. Instant replay fixes the correctable errors and gets everyone back on the field as if they never happened, helping the athletes on the field decide the game.” even excellent officials can make mistakes but cameras never lie. NCAA Men's Basketball title game duke vs Wisconsin with two minutes to go a call was made that gave duke an upper hand with an out of bound ball but the replay showed that duke was the last one touch the ball before going out of bounds. The referee and the camera see different things but the camera never lies. A camera can show you everything and you can watch it over and over again. Cam Cole writer of “How instant replay is ruining professional sports, one coach’s challenge at a time” says, “Indeed, refereeing has to be the worst job in the world, now that they all live in fear of being shown up by replay”. Officiating hasn't gotten worse. Technology has gotten better. However replays give you a better look at the play with different angles and shots that the human eyes may not of seen. The research clearly show the reasons why sports use instant replay and why they need them. These are new times technology is getting better and cameras just don't lie. The game haven't change just the way we look at it. You can watch plays in different angles, you can watch a play you miss and you can we if there's a foul on the play with you own eyes using instant replays. Should instant replay be use in sports? What do you think?
says, “Excellent officials may find themselves in poor position to see how a particular play unfolds, or simply miss a call. Instant replay fixes the correctable errors and gets everyone back on the field as if they never happened, helping the athletes on the field decide the game.” even excellent officials can make mistakes but cameras never lie. NCAA Men's Basketball title game duke vs Wisconsin with two minutes to go a call was made that gave duke an upper hand with an out of bound ball but the replay showed that duke was the last one touch the ball before going out of bounds. The referee and the camera see different things but the camera never lies. A camera can show you everything and you can watch it over and over again. Cam Cole writer of “How instant replay is ruining professional sports, one coach’s challenge at a time” says, “Indeed, refereeing has to be the worst job in the world, now that they all live in fear of being shown up by replay”. Officiating hasn't gotten worse. Technology has gotten better. However replays give you a better look at the play with different angles and shots that the human eyes may not of seen. The research clearly show the reasons why sports use instant replay and why they need them. These are new times technology is getting better and cameras just don't lie. The game haven't change just the way we look at it. You can watch plays in different angles, you can watch a play you miss and you can we if there's a foul on the play with you own eyes using instant replays. Should instant replay be use in sports? What do you think?