The number of violent crimes committed by young people declined substantially from the 1990s to 2003, but then surged again that year, with the estimated number of juvenile murder offenders increasing 30 percent, according to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
n their 2008 book "Rethinking Juvenile Justice," MacArthur researchers Dr. Laurence Steinberg and Elizabeth Scott concluded that young people under age 15 should never be tried as adults.
Steinberg and Scott make clear that mitigation because of youth -- the fact that teens are less blameworthy than adults -- is not the same as an excuse. That is, trying youths in juvenile court is not the same as absolving them of responsibility.
Refernces
Juvenile Justice: Too Young for Life in Prison?
July 12, 2010
By HUMA KHAN ABC NEWS
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…
- 863 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
It was noted that while juveniles are capable of committing truly heinous crimes, they are not fully culpable for three main reasons. The first reason discussed was that juveniles under the age of eighteen lack the maturity and responsibility that adults have attained. This shortcoming causes decisions and subsequent actions to be poorly thought out. Basically, juveniles are not responsible decision makers. This idea was supported by the fact that most states do not allow minors to vote, do jury duty, or get married without consent. The second rationale for why juveniles are less culpable than adults dealt with environment. It was suggested that juveniles lack control over their environment. They do not have the ability to remove themselves from an environment that encourages delinquency. Finally, juveniles are less culpable because they are still developing a sense of self identity. This suggests that behaviors exhibited now may not be part of their character in five or ten years, allowing for recovery. The majority then argued that the same reasoning they used in Stanford v. Kentucky applied to Roper v. Simmons, and that the eighth amendment did not allow for the execution of people under age eighteen due to lesser culpability (Counsel of Record,…
- 2284 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
If one looks at the background of juvenile crimes, they would find that there has been much development on the trials of adolescents and how they were viewed. Children have been described as the future, the greatest resource, and the hope for a better tomorrow. Children have been viewed as lacking in self-control by many Americans. “ Juveniles in adult institutions are five time more likely to be sexually assaulted, twice as likely to beaten by staff, and fifty percent more likely to be attacked with a weapon than minors in juvenile facilities” (White). They are usually beaten or harassed by hardened, adult criminals. For centuries, criminal youngsters have been on the wrong side of justice. In the 1800’s, the belief was shared by the public that juveniles and adult offenders should be prisoned…
- 268 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Juveniles commit a lot of crimes and much of it is because of influences and or surrounded lifestyles. Majority of the crimes committed by juveniles are violent crimes but the main ones involve drug abuse and simple assault. Juveniles account for 17 percent of all arrest according to the FBI and 15 percent of those arrest were due to violent crimes. ( Juvenile Crime, 2001 2003)…
- 1116 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Do you think if a juvenile was to commit a serious crime that they should be tried as an adult and sent to prison? In my opinion, I feel that even though a child has committed a serious crime they should be charged according to their age. If they're not considered as an adult when they have committed the crime they shouldn’t be tried as an adult. There are so many things that can happen to a juvenile while in prison. They won’t have what they need in order to help them…
- 92 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Juveniles should not be tried as adults when they commit serious crimes, because the adult prison is too violent with juveniles not mature and fully mentally developed, and children in the adult criminal justice system are more likely to…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Several authors address the issues surrounding juveniles who are tried as adults (Hudson, 2009; Mason, Chapman, Chang & Simons, 2003; Nunez, Tang, 2003). Hudson (2009) emphasizes…
- 1525 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
There are many laws that specifically prohibit teen and adolescent under the age of 18 from doing many things and are there to “protect” us. There is always a punishment when they are broken. The same should apply, if a juvenile is to commit a heinous crime like homicide or first-degree murder, they should be tried and sentenced for the crime. Therefore, I do agree that juveniles should be tried as an adult when they commit the same crimes as that of an adult.…
- 755 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
They are not adults, so they should not be tried as adults. Adolescent brain research shows that children do not have the same mental capacities as adults and the brain is still developing well into their 20s (Ryan). The final part of the brain to mature, the prefrontal cortex, is the part of the brain that works with reasoning and judgment. The changes that happen between 18 and 25 are a continuation of the process that starts around puberty, and 18 year olds are about halfway through that process (Candy). One of the side effects of these changes in the reward system is that adolescents and young adults become much more sensitive to peer pressure than they will be as adults. For instance, a teenager is more likely to do something risky when friends are watching rather than if they were…
- 1256 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
In today’s society, there is a national debate about what to do with juveniles in the criminal justice system. This debate is a result changes in practice throughout United States. The United States made it possible to try juveniles as adults in court after the case of Kent vs. the United States in 1966. The change in legislation is relatively new due to the fact that juvenile courts have "for most of the past century, treated youngsters between 7 and 17 not as criminals but as delinquents." The United States choose to treat the kids as delinquents because there was a major focus on rehabilitation rather than punishment.…
- 4926 Words
- 20 Pages
Good Essays -
Juvenile Justice: Should children be tried as adults? Are youth capable of fully understanding the consequences that their actions may cause or are they mentally incapable of processing that information? Juveniles commit crimes just like adults. Sometimes the crimes they commit are heinous, but does that mean they are no longer a child? I believe there may be special cases when a youth should be tried as an adult, but in most cases, they need to be processed through the juvenile justice system.…
- 3987 Words
- 16 Pages
Better Essays -
In conclusion, murder is wrong no matter one's age. Teens at some point must take responsibility for their actions. It's one thing to make a wrong decision to break the law, but another when you're taking someone's life. At any age you take a life, you should give your life up. Americans can easily resolve this issue by instilling in young children that it's wrong to kill. Nobody should get away with…
- 663 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Controversies dealing with juveniles’ age in which they can be charged as adults, giving them life sentences in prison without parole, the application of neuroscience, and the roles both the federal and state governments have played in shaping the policies towards justice reform have been discussed at length for the better half of United States (U.S.) History (755). Dating as far back as 1825, the United States of America has delved into the topic of juvenile justice (755). Today, advocates of the youth and victims’ rights still provide strong interest in criminal justice reform. From lobbying for light sentencing standards for the youth, to making them accountable for their actions, the controversies and arguments towards reforming juvenile…
- 1635 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Implementing the 2 types of juvenile waivers has proven inconclusive as to whether or not there has been a decrease in juvenile crime. Threatening a juvenile that they will be waived to adult status and held accountable to the same standards as an adult has not proven to be a deterrent to juvenile criminals. When…
- 1432 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Due to sudden increase in youth crime rate in 90’s, many states started to put juveniles to the adult court believing that this could bring down the crime rate. Some studies showed that starting to put youth in adult prisons helped the crime rate go down, but had no effect on violent crime rate. Many voices came up for easing the law for juveniles to not to be sentenced as adults due to decrease in youth crime rate from 2000. On the other hand, some people say that sentencing juvenile criminals as adults can make citizens feel safe from those criminals. I believe that the people under eighteen years old should never be tried and sentenced as adults, because not like the adults’ brains which are known to be fully developed, juveniles’ brain…
- 1274 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays