Preview

Should Mental Illnesses Be Held Criminal Or Insane

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
78 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should Mental Illnesses Be Held Criminal Or Insane
One can be both incompetent and insane, but must be knowledgeable in order to stand trial to have a jury at the time of the crime.
People who commit criminal acts under the influence of mental illnesses should not be held criminally responsible for their acts or omissions in the same way that sane responsible people are. No person should be convicted of a crime if he or she was legally insane at the time of the
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Summary: The Civil Right To Illea 'Insane'
    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary: The Civil Right To Illea 'Insane'

    What are the legal standards of incompetence when it comes to a trial? How mentally ill does an individual have to be to be given the ‘by reason of insanity' verdict? Frontline's documentary special, A Crime of Insanity, explores the diverging opinions of what truly constitutes a defendant's mental illness, as well as their competency of withstanding a trial. Ralph Tortorici, a mentally unstable 26-year-old, walked onto State University of New York campus along with a high-powered rifle concealed under his clothes. Tortorici seized a class seminar hostage, exclaiming that he had a computer chip implanted within his head and penis, and demanded that he speak with the President. Shortly after, the police and SWAT…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter
    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Week 6 - Psy 270 Checkpoint Mind over Matter

    When we apply the labels ‘mental illness’ and ‘schizophrenic mental disorder to a person, it does not necessarily mean, from a legal standpoint that this person does not know right from wrong. What this term would include would be things like mental deficiencies, like when a person would suffer form hallucinations or other mental diseases and retardation. “In M'Naghten's modern form, a defendant who pleads insanity must prove that at the time of the offense he or she was suffering from a mental disease or disability, such as retardation, so severely as not to know either "the nature and quality of the act" or whether it was right or wrong” (Gibeaut, 2006). So if this person who committed this crime did not understand the crimes consequences, and did not know the difference between right and wrong, this would fall under M'Naghten's rule. In order for someone to use that insanity defense, these aspects had to be present. From the original rule to now, it has been shortened legally to not knowing right from wrong. As far as alcohol cases go; this person knows right form wrong, but because they are intoxicated from alcohol, they acted in a ‘diminished capacity”; they however were not acting out of mental disease.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    James Holmes Research Paper
    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    James Holmes Research Paper

    Imagine having a family member that suffers from a mental illness and is not always in full control over his actions. He has not gotten the help he needs yet and has become addicted to medication with life dangering side effects. Then one day he unexpectedly goes out and commits a horrific crime. Should he have to go through the same process that a perfectly sane criminal would go through? Should he be detained or actually get the help he needs through rehabilitation to overcome his illness? This story summarizes exactly what happened to James Holmes. On July 20, 2012 during The Dark Knight Rises premier, James Holmes allegedly killed 12 people and injured 58 others in Aurora Colorado (Press). It was not Holmes’ complete fault for committing the crime. Holmes should have the opportunity to be rehabilitated because his mind is a great asset to society; he also suffered from psychiatric problems that can be fixed through rehab.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions
    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions

    By Reason of Insanity: Should Defendants with Traumatic Brain Injuries Be Held Accountable for Their Actions…

    • 2068 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis
    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Ohio Insanity Case Analysis

    This paper will include what the insanity statutes are in Ohio, the state that I live in. I will also talk about how often the insanity defense is used in the United States. As well as how successful this defense is. I will also discuss if psychologists should give their ultimate opinion in regards to sanity cases as well as the ethical issues that may rise from their opinions. Lastly, I will discuss how difficult it is to provide adequate psychological care for mentally ill patients while they are incarcerated in prison. The care they would have received had they been institutionalized in a mental hospital instead would have resulted in fewer deaths.…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense
    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Profound Pros And Cons Of The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Interaction Between The Mentally Ill And The Criminal Justice System
    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Comparing The Interaction Between The Mentally Ill And The Criminal Justice System

    Perhaps the most complicated consequence of the interaction between the mentally ill and the criminal justice system is the reality of incarceration. Unfortunately, it is too often the case where a person with schizophrenia is convicted of a crime and incarcerated, but as a result of their mental illness negatively impacting their trial. This was the case of Theodore Kaczynski, a man diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and accused of sending bombs through the mail. Kaczynski “continued to tell the judge and his lawyers that he did not want to be labeled mentally ill” and thus his lawyer could not use a defense of mental illness (Reisner et al, 87). Subsequently, Kaczynski was sentenced to life without parole.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Are You Free and Responsible for Your Ethical Actions
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Are You Free and Responsible for Your Ethical Actions

    Ethical actions are not always as cut and dry as one would think. There are circumstances where we are responsible for our actions and then there are times when we cannot control the circumstances and cannot be held responsible. If you do something because you are forced to do it by threat, or you are not mentally capable to form the right choice about the action, then the choice of ethics does not matter. We are held responsible only for actions that we have a choice in. If an accused person claims to have been insane at the time of the crime and if a jury finds that the person was insane at the time of the crime, the person is felt to have been incapable of making a free choice and is then not responsible for the action in question.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense
    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Insanity Defense

    This is a tough subject and the argument about this is never ending. Does a person who committed crime can use insanity defense as an excuse for his/her actions? The insanity defense reflects the generally accepted belief that the person who cannot appreciate the consequences of their actions should not be punished for criminal acts. Most states regulate the defense with statues, but a few states allow the courts to craft the rule for its proper use.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane
    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dead or Alive: the Criminally Insane

    Severely mentally ill individuals may commit horrific crimes. Many believe that these crimes deserve the death penalty; however, others believe that in certain circumstances the mentally ill should be exempt from capital punishment and believe that the punishment is too extreme for those who are not fully aware of committing their crimes. Many mentally ill individuals have been executed and some are currently on death row. All the while, this controversial issue is still being debated on.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Not Guilty: The Insanity Defense
    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Not Guilty: The Insanity Defense

    Having a mental illness alone isn 't usually enough The mental illness has to be so severe that the defendant is unaware that his or her actions are wrong or is uncontrollably compelled to commit a criminal act. Typically, people who can legitimately claim insanity have a history of severe mental illness, although occasionally someone commits a crime during their first psychotic break. Even when the defendant 's mental illness is obvious and acute, the insanity defense may not work. A more common verdict in Michigan is guilty but mentally ill, which doesn 't impact the sentence but could affect the services that the defendant receives in the criminal-justice system. (Borum and Fulero, 1999)…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense Strategies
    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Insanity Defense Strategies

    To this day, only five states deny the defendant of the use of insanity defense. The insanity defense has such a firm historical and moral origin that provide fairness to defendants who suffer from mental disorders. It is important that the government and the public to treat them with consideration; provide them with the treatment that suitable for the individual’s illness to make them better in hope of release them back into the community when they are no longer a threat to the public rather than to confine them in prison and let them…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Insanity Defense
    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Insanity Defense

    One of the many issues that trouble the American Justice System today is that of the insanity defense. This defense has been brought in front of courts for years and has caused massive debate. The insanity defense plays a powerful role in our society which begs for justice. However some look upon it as a god sent, while other feel it is the enemy. ?The insanity defense is rooted in a basic principle of justice: that it is unfair to hold persons responsible for their actions when they don?t know, or cant control, what they are doing? (Worth 16), but is it true that people really don?t ?know? what they are doing; and if so should they still be punished for it? Many who share negative feelings towards the insanity defense believe that it is not a defense in the victims case but a defense to aid the perpetrator.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Criminal Defense
    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Essay On Criminal Defense

    “Disease of the mind”, is any illness, disorder, or abnormal condition which impairs the human mind and its functioning. It excludes temporary conditions of alcohol, drugs, hysteria or concussion. People use this as an excuse to criminal liability because mental illness is covered under section 16 of the Criminal Code. The insanity defense prevents a mentally-incapacitated person from being criminally punished. In order to plea insanity, the courts provide a variety of legal test to help determine the mental state of the offender. The most used test is the M’Naghten rule; which states that an offender is insane if mental illness prevents them from knowing the difference between right and wrong. Another test that states like to use is the “irresistible impulse” test. This test states that “If the defendant is suffering from a mental disease that prevents control of personal conduct, he or she may be adjudged not guilty by reason of insanity, even if he or she knows the difference between right and wrong.” Pleading insanity is by no means a “get out of jail free” card. Most offenders that are found not guilty because of insanity are sent to a mental health institution. They are required to be there for a long period of time, most spend longer in the institution than they would have spent in prison if they had been found…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Insanity Defense
    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Insanity Defense

    The insanity defense is one of the several legal questions that might be raised in a criminal case. This type of defense in a criminal case focuses on the defendant’s cognitive and mental state at the time of the offense. Due to this speculation, the questions focuses on whether the defendant is criminally responsible for his or her behavior due to the mental state at the time of the offense (Hugaboom, 2002). Also, additional questions are required to determine psychological evidence might also be included in the case. The psychological issues will include the defendant’s competency to stand trial, the mental conditions that are relevant in consideration of the sentencing, and competency to waive rights. According to Hugaboom (2002), insanity…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics