Countries with Nuclear Weapons Capability:
Acknowledged: U.K., China, France, India, Pakistan, Russia, United States, Israel, North Korea1
Seeking: Syria, Iran
Abandoned: South Africa constructed but then voluntarily dismantled six uranium bombs. Belarus, Kazakhstan, Ukraine; when Soviet Union broke up, these former states possessed nuclear warheads that they have since given up and declared themselves non-nuclear weapon states.
Source: U.S. State Department, TIME magazine and the Nuclear Threat Initiative.
After get to know all this little but important information I can say that those Nuclear Nations shouldn’t disarm their nuclear weapons. Maybe it can sound so rude but after all the things that happened in 9/11 and the war in Syria it can be terrified to those nations to be unprotected in case anything happen. For example if they disarm their nuclear weapons they going to be like a rich house without a padlock.
It can be easy to say “Disarm your nuclear weapon” but imagine United States without this, it’s like to sign their own death warrant and worst because this country has a historical responsibility to those nations that are under communist and also the one that are able to get to like South Korea all this by the policy of containment. In the main moment that US get to disarm their nuclear weapons we can considered this our last day in this world because their enemies will attack immediately.
Actually this is not just about US countries as Pakistan and China are really close to be burn if they take this stupid decision and just like them any president that put this as a choice to stop war because it can end a war of course but with more than one country disappearing. My point is that as long as they can get a country save by having this weapons they don’t have to worry about nothing really.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Despite the fall of the Soviet Union 19 years ago in 1991, the issue of nuclear arms, besides terrorism, remains one of the chief security concerns in the contemporary world. Accordingly, the following issues concerning nuclear arms remained unresolved security concerns.Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These events not only brought about the surrender of the Japan and an end to World War II, but they also helped shaped the nature of international politics for the next six decades.The atomic bomb is the crudest form of a series of powerful nuclear weapons to be eventually developed and come into existence. Both superpowers, the United States of America and the Soviet Union, eventually built massive stockpiles of nuclear weapons during the Cold War. This escalation of nuclear arms possession led to…
- 401 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“A world free of nuclear weapons is a global public good of the highest order” (Ki-Moon). Ban Ki-Moon is the United Nations Secretary-General. Ki-Moon was born in South Korea, in the past, wars tore through South Korea and had received threats of nuclear destruction. Because of these tragic events, Ki-Moon feels very strongly that nuclear weapons are the world’s greatest threat (Ki-Moon). Ki-Moon was not the only to think this way. After World War l, the American people also started to see how destructive the weapons were. Senator William Borah proposed disarmament in 1920. The proposition became popular very quickly throughout the United States (Brookhiser). Although the idea of disarmament had caught on, the United States’s nuclear stockpile…
- 808 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Since the 1980’s, the two superpowers have reduced their nuclear weapons by almost 70%. Today, we still have more nuclear weapons than any military purpose could justify. Unfortunately, the command and control system in Russia has deteriorated further.…
- 866 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Yet, as years have gone since the US first developed a functioning nuclear weapon, the reasons for stockpiling nuclear warheads have begun to contain more of a domestic factor, and a normative factor to go with the clear initial security…
- 912 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Countries with nuclear weapons were now also unable to pass nuclear weapons to countries without…
- 1123 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
If some other country was to obtain these weapons and we had none, we would be at their mercy. There are a lot of maniacs out there who have the ability to rise to power and gain support, just like Hitler, Stalin, or Mussolini did. Once these kinds of leaders gain power, they can obtain nuclear weapons. Even though none of them did, they had the power to, and the only reason they didn’t is because they didn’t live in the nuclear age. However, we were still watching these leaders to make sure they weren’t making weapons of mass destruction. This proved to be a waste of time because they never did, but even while we were watching them, Hitler was still able to create more innovative and useful weapons that he…
- 1791 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Should the United States keep and maintain nuclear weapons today? Yes, because without nuclear weapons we would not be able to have the protection we have today since the threat of nuclear war. Which the odds of that happing are very slim since these weapons of mass destruction cause so much damage, but if the U.S where to get rid of the nuclear weapons today that would leave a huge vulnerability slot for us since the other countries would very well keep their nuclear weapons and use them against us. Therefore the United States should keep their nuclear weapons and continue to maintain them just in case of a serious threat required use one.…
- 1607 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Millions killed in nuclear disaster, thousands left homeless, countries left in peril! These are some of the many consequences that are faced in a nuclear dependent world. Day after day people live in fear that one tiny mistake, one wrong word can cripple our world and leave the survivors living in rubble. The world has discovered that despite the enormous precautions taken, disasters and destruction still constantly resurface themselves through our short, but eventful nuclear history. During World War II, Albert Einstein sent a letter to President Dwight Eisenhower that has shaped mankind from that moment on. It described a weapon that would release enough energy to destroy an entire city("USA weapons of mass destruction." ). Now nearly four score ago the consequences we face for this technology has been detrimental to our society. Scientific discoveries also yielded the idea of using this extraordinary power as an energy source and a extraordinary threat.Due to these undeniable risks, the world needs to remove all sources of nuclear weaponry and power.…
- 741 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Numerous countries today such as Russia, North Korea, and Pakistan continue to develop and test nuclear weapons. This race to develop nuclear weapons was started by the United States near the end of World War II. The U.S. used nuclear weapons in World War II to make the Japanese surrender. The Japanese surrendered five days after the cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki were bombed. Whether this bombing was justified is still debated today.…
- 1057 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In the event that these nations debilitate to utilize these bombs, which we know will be totally destroying to our country, I feel the best way to react is with a similar message, and we should be prepared for them. The United States needs to figure out how to incapacitate alternate nations totally with the goal that we may devastate the atomic weapons, yet we realize that is a substantial errand that would be hard to…
- 77 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…
- 399 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
To better prepare for threats from weapon of mass destruction the United States should never under estimate the power and capability of foreign allies such as China, Russia, North Korea, Iran and Iraq to strike the United States. In addition, the National Resource Defense Counsel Report should keep track of the nuclear warheads that each country has. As…
- 411 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…
- 427 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Evidence does exist that terrorist cells, such as Al-Qaeda, is constantly pursuing a nuclear capability. Whether that capability is acquisition or production is not necessarily certain, but the sources, as shown by the mishandling of HEU in some countries, are out there. Potential sources of nuclear weapons, like Russia and Pakistan, also present a concern due to their ample supply of tactical nuclear weapons which, by comparison of high yield bombs, have low security measures (Oppenheimer 2005,…
- 647 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays