Should Police Be Allowed To Protect Privacy?

Where is the line between protecting people's safety and protecting their privacy? Some people argue that officials should be able to invade the privacy of others. They think that this could possibly keep others safe. Some argue the opposite, that officials should not be able to use the information they obtained from private devices or social networking sites. There are absolutely no reasons for officials to be able to look through personal belongings because they want to. For example, police can abuse the power by making up excuses to stop civilians, then they wouldn't have to have probable cause to look through someone's' belongings without a warrant. “Policy could be abused… using something else to pull you over then using this to look
It is morally wrong for our country and state to make laws where it gives the option to officials to be able to look through your things. This breaches security in our nation because it is giving the government too much power over its citizens. In addition, it contradicts the fourth amendment, which states that citizens have a right to no unreasonable searches and seizures of personal belongings without a warrant. “Cell phone searches are an invasion of privacy… smartphones can contain a wide variety of information against a person,” two judges said who voted against these laws. This makes your actions less justifiable is they look through something of yours that may look suspicious, but has nothing to do with the situation. You may have something on you that has nothing to do with why you’re supposedly in trouble but can get you in more trouble if they are able to go through your things. Furthermore, puts way too much pressure on teachers and officials. According to the article Password Protected, “punishing students for what they do on the web is the responsibility of parents, not schools.”. It is unreasonable for teachers to have to make sure that all of their hundreds