Should smoking be banned in public areas? Well in my point of view, smoking should be banned in public areas. Why should smoking be banned? We are not limiting the freedom of the person who smokes. However, this is because smoking in public areas will be a disturbance to the people around the smoker and it will shorten the lives of the smoker. By restricting some of the public areas not to smoke, lots of people will benefit from that.
Why should smoking be banned in public areas? There are two reasons for that. Firstly, it damages the health of the smoker and the passive smoker. The second reason is smoking may be a disturbance to the people around it.
I believe that smoking should be banned in public areas such as restaurants and airport terminals. It damages the health of the smokers and people around them. How does it damage the health? Cigarette contains 4000 dangerous chemical which may cause lung cancer, bronchitis, pneumonia and other diseases. This cigarette is destruction both to you smokers and to innocent people. So at least try to smoke in your room with your doors shut.
The second reason why I believe that smoking should be banned in public areas is because the smoke may be a disturbance to the people around the smoker. If a person smokes, he is not the only one to suffer but also the passive smokers. When a pregnant mother walk passes through a smoker, the women will breathe in the cigarette smoke. If she stands around the smoker for a long time, her baby will be given birth prematurely or the baby will die before they can even be given birth. There are some cases in which the infant dies. I feel really sorry for them.
Many people are going in and out of these restaurants and airport terminals and these places are air-conditioned. This means the smoke inside is not getting out easily. So if 10 person smokes at the same time, the whole place will be overwhelmed by the smoke. People inside this place will be affected and will get some diseases like pneumonia and others. Many people’s health will be affected negatively. So smoking be banned the public areas!
In conclusion, I feel that smoking should be banned in public areas not just in airport terminals. This is a good way to stop innocent people suffering the disease. Public areas are for people to relax, for example, restaurants and parks. Different types of people are always at these places. There are absolutely no advantages in smoking whether alone or in public areas. Why shorten your life? Live while you can live and contribute positively to the environment. Think smokers. You are not only destroying your own life but also many thousands of life. This is just an advice. Smoking is bad for you and the people around you.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
What about the non-smoker who always has to respectfully get up and move tables every times someone lights up, or the couple that covers their nose while walking down the street to avoid the smoke traveling in front of them, And let’s not forget the children who are easily sickened and is forced to play in the sand while someone’s father is having a quick smoke on the bench at the park. Smoking should definitely be banned on the non smoker behalf. It is worse for those that work in a bar, café or a restaurant. They have no way of escaping that dirty stale cigarette smell, and it’s not…
- 543 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Smoking cigarettes can cause lung problems. Both first-hand and second-hand smokers are affected by cigarette smoke. Scientific findings and researches show that the chemicals in cigarettes, apart from the smoke, can lead to health problems such as lung cancer. Smoking cigarettes should be banned in public places. In public places, more people, both young and old, can be exposed to the smoke from cigarettes. My position differs from those who might say that smoking altogether should not be banned. My position is that smoking in public places should be banned. It does not include smoking in private places like homes. Smoking in public places should be banned because it poses health risks to individuals who are non-smokers and who do not want to inhale the fumes from cigarettes. The risks are double to those who already have lung ailments.…
- 577 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Smoking should be illegal. Primarily the smoker’s lungs are permanently damaged. Also second hand smoke is by far the worst type of inhalation of smoke. Many say that smoking is a freedom. But should the government allow people to kill each other in order to be “free”. Our health should not be in danger if we want to be free. Also many teenagers who try cigarettes have a higher rate of violent offenses and, are more likely to be addicted to this horrendous drug. Therefore cigarettes should be prohibited from production.…
- 524 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever come home with the stench of smoke just protruding from your clothes? Have you ever coughed and choked as you inhaled a cloud of smoke as a group of immature smokers passed by? If you have, then you would agree that neither one of these experiences is very pleasant, and could have been avoided if smoking was banned in public places.…
- 704 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Smoking is one of the number 1 killers in the world. It not only kills the people smoking, it also kills the people who around it. Tobacco contains nicotine which is highly addictive. So people addicted to it even they know smoking gives you cancer, heart desease, asthma and other health problems. Therefore we are totally think that tobacco products should be banned because it is harmful, waste of money, and affects to the environment. Smoking can shorten your life by 10 years.…
- 379 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
There are many reasons why smoking in public should be banned. The three main reasons to ban smoking in public are because of the health risks, offensive smell, and environmental risks that are the cause of cigarette smoke. Secondhand smoke is smoke from a cigarette, cigar, or pipe that is involuntarily inhaled, especially by non-smokers (The American Heritage Stedman’s Medical Dictionary, n.d.). In many public places smoking is allowed and is not fair because non-smokers are exposed to chemicals that can harm them internally and externally. Children for example, are chronic victims of secondhand smoke. The inhalation of cigarette smoke that can harm people nearby is called passive smoking (Pros Vs. Cons, 2007, p.1). Also cigarette smoke can make non-smokers agitated by the smell of cigarette smoke, which is not very pleasant. Also the environment is tainted by the hazardous chemicals, which can cause permanent scars on the earth. For the most part, smoking in public should be banned to help decreases its negative affects.…
- 1467 Words
- 4 Pages
Powerful Essays -
I believe smoking should be banned inside and outside of workplaces, due to the Worksafe health and safety procedures and wellbeing for fellow employees, customers and the general public.…
- 280 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
A physical separation of smokers and non-smokers in a public place isn't enough. It is unfair for one person's nasty habit to affect another person's health. Currently 48 states and the District of Columbia have Clean Air Acts intact. The state of California has a law that prohibits smoking of any kind inside any…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
With that being said, if someone is smoking and other people are near, then the second hand smoke can increase the risk of others getting lung cancer. The polluted air in smoking sections, at different restaurants for example, carries over to the non-smoking section quite often. About 126 million people are exposed to the drifting of secondhand smoke in the air per year. Smoking can cause allergic reactions; it also increases the risk of people with asthma to have an asthma attack. Not only does public smoking harm others, it also harms the one smoking.…
- 374 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Are you tried of seeing cigarette smokers at every public place? Watching people smoking disgusts me, the way they pollute the air with the smoke and flick the ash onto the ground. It is a horrible habit that should be banned.…
- 1425 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
It has become common knowledge that smoking is bad for people’s health, nonetheless people continue to smoke. To be honest, that is fine. If people want to endanger themselves by smoking then I wish them a swift and peaceful end (though most smokers die a slow and agonizing death). What is not acceptable is the effect that smoke has on non-smokers who have almost no way of getting away from smoke unless they want to stay in their house. Smokers affect everyone around them for the worse. Smoking should be restricted or banned from all public places because the health of non-smokers should not be jeopardized by secondhand smoke.…
- 1133 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Another big reason why I think cigarettes should be illegal is second-hand smoking. Second hand smoking is when someone is smoking and their smoke from the cigarettes get in non-smokers lungs. Second hand smoke can cause lung cancer and heart disease. Second hand smoke in public areas should be illegal because people that haven’t even smoked in their life they get cancer and could die. Also can cause babies to die too. They can get SIDS (sudden infant death…
- 431 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Claim: Smoking should be banned from all public locations such as schools and hospitals, because of its danger to others.…
- 654 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Have you ever come home with the stench of smoke clinging to your clothes? Or inhaled a cloud of smoke as a group of smokers passed, causing you to cough and choke? Neither experience is pleasant, and this is why smoking should be banned in public areas.…
- 590 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Most controversial debate is going on public smoking ban. The reason is simple, smoking ban affects directly all people rapidly and we can see its effects in a short-term period. There have been a lot of arguments brought up both in favour and against a public smoking ban. Some of the arguments in favour are the following. Smoking ban is one of the controversial ways for reducing smoking and recognizing non-smokers' right to health protection. The health risks of smoking are clear. Passive smoking does carry risks. Many leading medical and scientific organizations recognize second hand smoke as a cause of a range of life-threatening conditions. The health situation could be drastically improved if one of the risk factors - tobacco - was eliminated. People have a right to protect themselves from smoke inhalation. People shouldn't have to inhale the ill-effects of other people's smoking. The creation of smoke-free public places also improves air quality.…
- 458 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays