Don’t get me wrong, freedom of religion is important to. It supports the right of a person or group to practice their religion in public or private. It also includes the freedom to change their religion or not follow one at all. This is very important because nobody should ever be told how to practice his or her own religion or what religion to follow. We're all different, and we all see religion differently.
Freedom of speech is essential part of democratic government tho. The only way truth can emerge is when there is an open competition of ideas. However, there is a strong support of censorship when people start mentioning extremely offensive opinions. Should the freedom of speech be limited in this case? Im my opinion, the answer is no. If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. If we want to enjoy the freedom fully, the full protection should be given to the freedom of speech. There are no compromises about it.
Freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment is not just a right, which can be declared or abolished. According to the “Liberty Theory”, proposed by some legal scholars, freedom of speech is an essential part of the liberty of every person, who pursues an individual self-determination and self-realization. There for, freedom of speech is also a part more global right to freedom of personal development and self-expression.
These rights are all important to us as American citizens. It’s why we can do, what we do, when we do it. Without the First Amendment there would be major difficulties trying to communicate your opinions from one person or place to another. You wouldn’t be able to change your religion, or even pick one, and the press would be completely controlled by the government which means bias opinions about other people and countries.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Introduction of the topic Freedom of Speech II. Informing —Describe the personal liberty and the amendment The first amendment, written in the bill of rights, is used to ensure that some of the most fundamental human rights are provided to U.S. citizens equally. Freedom of speech, being one of these fundamental liberties, has been questioned quite often though, in terms of limitations. III.…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Our constitution gives us the right under the First Amendment to the Freedom of Speech. This seems like a fairly straight forward right, but what many don’t know is that the Constitution only guarantees our right to freedom of speech against abridgement by government, federal or state. (Hudgens v. National Labor Relations Board, 424 U.S. 507 Lexis).…
- 2468 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The First Amendment protection for freedom of expression “consists of the rights to freedom of speech, press, assembly, petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied rights of association and belief” (www.law.cornell.edu). Though there are several components of freedom of expression “the most basic component of freedom of expression is the right of freedom of speech” (www.law.cornell.edu). The First Amendment states that the “right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government”…
- 1501 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
The First Amendment, Freedom of Speech could probably be considered one of the most powerful amendments of the Constitution. It is very important to distinguish the suitability of Freedom of Speech and its’ position under the First Amendment. The essay “Protecting Freedom of Expression on the Campus” presented by Derek Bok gives an example as to why this should be. In his essay Derek Bok responded to the presentation of the Confederate flag and the swastika by students at Harvard, with the expectation that the readers already have an understanding of what the phrase “freedom of speech” means to them as well as other people universally. “The right to freedom of speech allows individuals to express themselves without interference or constraint by the government. The Supreme Court requires the government to provide substantial justification for the…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The first Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of expression from government interference. This is one of the most important amendments in the constitution and is what America is most proud of. However, these rights aren’t all they are cracked up to be. For example, censorship is very common and goes against the freedom of speech. Censorship has many different roles in society both in the past and present. In the past it was used as a way for dictators to control their people and keep them from reading rebellious literature. Hitler even burned all books that he did not like.…
- 581 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Overall, as Roger Rosenblatt stated and explained in his article defending the freedom of speech, the United States must not procreate censorship of any greater extent on its citizen’s voices. In fact, “The Founding Fathers…
- 1325 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
While we fight to maintain our nation’s freedoms, sometimes it seems as though the First Amendment causes great harm within the country itself. Too many people hide behind the veil of claiming “Freedom of Speech”…
- 1161 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution, guarantees our freedom of expression, as it is written in the constitution, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their statements; and the freedom of the press, one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable.” This clause is the based foundation of the articles: “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Be Regulated” by Ronald Eissens, and “Hate Speech on the Internet Should Not Be Regulated” by Sandy Starr, in which both authors reveled their opinions and standing on this issue by using different styles and presenting their ideas in different ways.…
- 653 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Freedom of speech issues are constantly in the media today. There are plenty of incidents where people’s constitutional rights were met with great and unnecessary force. The First Amendment in the Constitution of the United States of America guarantees the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly, press, and the right to petition the government. These freedoms are impeded when their freedoms are met with retort. When free speech is not allowed in the public sector, honesty is no longer accepted. This, in turn, sets the precedent of honesty as being looked down upon and considered rude. Why should someone’s opinions be punished because they don’t go along with what is standard or declared acceptable by others. By infringing on the freedom of someone’s speech, it is the same as punishing them for being who they are. Freedom of speech should not be obstructed or met with retort by the…
- 1868 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
The First Amendment guarantees every American’s right to the free exchange of ideas, beliefs, and political debate. The First Amendment of the Constitution states that "Congress shall make no law… abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances" (National Archives and Records Administration 2001). We have the right of freedom of speech and by definition, this means that we have “the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint” (Dictionary). This law is stated in the Bill of Rights and has been around since 1971. It is one of the oldest and most important amendments we adopted because as American people we have a…
- 1792 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Freedom of speech is a beautiful idea. As a matter of fact, the first amendment itself is perhaps the greatest amendment in the Bill of Rights. As something that we take for granted most of the time, we never truly realize how much of a blessing it is to speak your mind and have decent conversations with each other. However, if you want it to rain, you have to deal with the mud and there are many examples of people spitting out stupid ideas or thoughts that should be kept to themselves.…
- 582 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Being able to express one’s self is one of the most important rights of the people to maintain a connected society right to speech should be accepted to do so. The first amendment is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals have. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. This amendment describes the principal rights of the citizens of the United States. If the citizens were unable to criticize the government, it would be impossible to regulate order. By looking at freedom of speech there is also freedom of assembly and freedom of press that are crucial for the United States democracy. According to the “Derechos, Human Rights”, freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights, because it means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. These types of rights are protected by the first amendment. There are groups for example like ACLU and other type of organization. ACLU is “America’s nation's guardian of liberty”, working daily in courts, legislatures and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights that the Constitution protects. We should be allowed to try our first amendment right specifically dealing with freedom of speech.…
- 1389 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
My belief is yes I do think there should be a limitation on Freedom of Speech. Especially with what happened to me and what I have seen what it has done to people when someone spreads lies about me. But others would not agree because the ones who would decide would be the government and they might not be very fair and would be bias with what they think is hostile. “They are almost certainly wrong. The truth is that when the government gets to decide which speech is permissible, its exercise of that authority is almost always driven by political considerations, not principled distinctions. And those who proposed the restrictions often come to regret it.”(PBS) People nowadays don’t like how much the government controls our life. That’s why some people don’t come out and say anything about people going after them and just result to suicide because government really doesn’t help at all maybe just a little. But the limitation is a hard to decide because where does free speech end and where does hostile and hate speech start. With talking about suicide. Do you know why people commit suicide…
- 753 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Freedom of speech has been said to be the foundation of modern democracy, and a fundamental part of the Western civilization. According to statistics, pretty much everyone claims to support freedom of speech. The claimed support of freedom of speech is widespread even amongst Muslims, of who over 90% support it. However, I'm positive that the numbers would be different if the question was whether it should be legal to draw cartoons about the prophet Muhammad.…
- 2116 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
I believe freedom of speech comes with limitations. In many ways it gives us the option to voice are opinions but, still doesn’t give us full complete power over what we say. In the article “When can faculties?” by Mitch Smith it talks about a sociology professor speaking her opinion. Professor Jamie Price voiced her opinion on a situation in class. While speaking her opinion she also showed explicit videos to prove her point. Professor Jamie price was fired on the charges of inappropriate speech and conduct in the classroom. In my opinion she was charged for speaking her opinion in the class. In this case, if the government restricted freedom of speech laws than I believe this wouldn’t have happened. In the article it says “Jamie had shown other documentaries and videos with the same content to prove her point to students. Meaning, she had done this in this past. If we let the government restrict some of our freedom of speech laws, this professor could have still had a job.…
- 611 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays