Preview

Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1587 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished
Should the Death Penalty be abolished?
Thomas Adam
PHI 103
Kurt Mosser
February 13, 2011

Introduction

Capital punishment is the execution, as a punishment for a person convicted of committing a heinous crime against humanity. Crimes that are known as capital crimes or capital offences enforce capital punishment; crimes against humanity, drug trafficking resulting in loss of life, terrorism, murder, kidnapping resulting loss of life, etc. are considered capital offences.
In this argumentative paper, I will argue, why the death penalty should never be abolished. I will also argue why the death penalty is morally right. Life in prison without parole should never be an option when heinous crimes are committed. This topic has been a concoverisal issue for many years.
Both sides of this topic have many different opinions. Many people believe that the practice in question is always wrong, against those who believe that the practice is sometimes justified or even mandatory.

Pro- Death Penalty
Retributivism requires the practice of capital punishment. Retibutivism is a theory of punishment. Retributivists are justified in punishing persons when and only when they deserve to be punished. When a person is morally blameworthy they must suffer the sanction; punishment.
The correct doctrinal triggers for liability and questions about how much offenders should be punished for certain crimes when done with levels of culpability.
The prevention of vigilante justice is presented as the real good retributivism. The state and government must punish those who deserve it. This will satisfy the people needs for feeling that they have not been deceived, thus restraining themselves from criminal action. I believe, retribution id the only solution for taken another life. “An eye of an eye”.
Kant’s theory pints out: “The evil that a wrongdoer inflicts is the measure of how severely he or she should be punished”. Retributivist theory holds not only that criminal guilt



Bibliography: Punishment, Theory, Theories, Criminal, Punish, and Deserve. www.law.jranlk.org retrieved from Google on Feb 6, 2011 Students against the Death Penalty-Home www.studentabolition.org retrieved from Google on Feb 7, 2011 http://orgs.law.ucla.edu/LTW/Documents/Week%20%20-%20Reading/Steiker%20-%20The%20Death%20Penalty%20and%Deontology.pdf www.orgs.law.ucla.edu Retrieved from Google Feb 10, 2011

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Chapter 5 of the textbook, the author examines retributive justice from the standpoint of the means of punishment (Section 5.2). He calls attention to the length of prison sentences and, in particular, the issue of mandatory life sentences for juvenile offenders.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Boonin

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the last chapter of The Problem of Punishment, David Boonin attempts to defend his belief in restitution as a replacement of punishment by the state. Unfortunately, Boonin falls short in his attempt to defend absolute restitution when addressing restitution during both murder and rape. Using convoluted language, the reader is lost in his arguments defense, instead of admitting that it falls short in cases such as rape and murder. To further understand this, it is necessary to consider the following. First, Boonin’s definition of pure restitution and why he treats it as an absolute concept. Second, Boonin’s defense of restitution in cases of rape and murder. Third, the problem with restitution.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The five goals of criminal sentencing as listed in the 6th edition of Criminal Justice Today are retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation and restoration. Retribution is defined within the text as, “the act of taking revenge upon a criminal perpetrator.” (Schmalleger, p.366) Retribution is often linked to early societies when punishment such as death and exile were carried out very swiftly without a…

    • 5792 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Touching Spirit Bear

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For many years, I find that the current justice system is inadequate in terms of dealing with offenders, victims and communities in the outcomes of crime. The modern civilization insists on treating harmful behavior and attitude with punishment. The current criminal justice system is seen as retributive, concentrating only on fixing the blame and guilt. On the other hand, Restorative Justice claims that victims should have a greater role in determining the outcome of their situation.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Let us consider then, a case where a retributivist anti-hero, Rorschach, from DC Comic’s Watchmen comes across an incident in an alleyway. A man has just shot and killed another man. Rorschach, having seen the crime unfold, is certain that the offender is guilty insofar as he knows that the criminal has murdered someone. Given that retributivism also prescribes the limits for punishment, he knows he is permitted to capitally punish the offender. With responsibility for the crime and appropriate punishment established, Rorschach proceeds to shoot the offender, killing him. Had Rorschach not been there, this criminal would have been caught, put on trial, found guilty, and sentenced to death anyways because he was sloppy and left behind the weapon with his name and fingerprints on it. It would appear as if justice would have been reached in either case, regardless of who, Rorschach or the state, punished this offender. But suppose that, unbeknownst to Rorschach, this criminal was acting under some impulse caused by something in the water he was drinking. He suspected the water wasn’t right, but he took a chance and drank it anyways. Let us further suppose that the established legal system in this society shares Peter Strawson’s view of expressivism…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1. What is the difference between retribution model of punishment and the utilitarian justification for punishment? The retributive justification for punishment focuses on what the offender deserves as a result of his or her criminal behavior and the utilitarian focus on the future criminal behavior of both the person being punished and other members of society.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophy Of Sentencing

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The complexities of human nature, emotions, thought, morals and ethics have been debated for centuries, and the dilemma of sentencing another human to a form of corporal punishment, incarceration or death, requires a firm foundation in the laws of the land, tempered by years of study and dedication to the law one has sworn to uphold. The several reasons for sentencing of a crime is: Revenge, for an actual or perceived need for vengeance on a violation, usually one that is very personal and emotional in nature. Incapacitation, which is to prevent the criminal from repeating crimes against society by placing them into a correctional facility on a long term or permanent basis. Restoration, is a form of sentencing when the convening authority is attempting to protect the victims by helping them to feel safe and secure. Deterrence is a sentence where the courts attempt to prevent the subject of a crime from offending again. Retribution, which is probably the oldest reason for sentencing was utilized for equal punishment to the crime, drawing from the old adage “eye for an eye”. Lastly is the sentence of rehabilitation, which in societies modern view, the ideal and preferred sentence,…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gebelein, R. S. (2000, 05). Sentencing and Correctiions: Issues for the 21st Century. Retrieved from U.S. Dept Of Justice: www.ncjrs.gov…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to James Rachels, he concluded the criminal justice system should be designed along the lines of retributivism, in much the way it currently is. Rachels comes to the conclusion the overall goal of punishment should be retributivism by examining the four requirements necessary for punishment. The four requirements for punishment are guilt, equal treatment, proportionality, and excuses. These requirements mean only the guilty get punished, each criminal who commits the same crime gets roughly the same punishment, the punishment is proportionate to the crime, and if provided a legit excuse, then no punishment is given. Rachels also argues that deterrence and rehabilitation do not meet the requirements, but retributivism does.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Immoral actions such as possession and use of drugs are common elements relating to crimes. Notably, these variables impact the procedure of applying the law fairly to all offenders of all crimes. Though restorative justice and retribution may work together in theory, it may not work in practice. Thus, our current system of retribution, (which identifies with negative judgment), is the prevailing form of justice in our society. The principle of Retributive justice is to correct the wrong and prevent retaliation by the…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is being overlooked is that restorative justice responses often contain retributive and punitive elements themselves – and sometimes, such as in serious cases, necessarily so. (Barton 1999, Ch. 10) Therefore, blaming retribution, or even punitiveness, for the ills of the criminal justice system is largely beside the point. Punishment and retribution cannot be ruled out by any system of justice. By implication, a more plausible critique of the status quo is…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Retribution does not seek to target what has caused the individual to result in committing crime and does not care about what happens after an offender has served their sentence (Cullen…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Punishment is described by the Webster Dictionary as ‘the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution to an offense’. Today, this definition may pass as true for many governments, but years ago when philosophers were discussing ideas about government and laws, one idea that stuck out was that of punishment. Different theories rose regarding justifying punishment, and deciding the purpose behind punishing people. Joel Feinberg, Jules Coleman, and Christopher Kutz are three philosophers that spent a lot of time discussing their beliefs and ideas about punishment.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays