Preview

Should the Death Penalty Be Reintroduced Into Britian

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
761 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should the Death Penalty Be Reintroduced Into Britian
Should capital punishment be reintroduced in Britain under any circumstances?

Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Since ancient times capital punishment has been a punishment for crimes like murder. Stoning, crucifixion, and drowning were old ways of carrying the death penalty out. Theses days some countries (the majority of the U.S.A., Iraq and others) say that they use more ‘humane’ ways of carrying out the death penalty. Theses include the electric chair, lethal injection and hanging. The death penalty in the U.K. has been abolished now since 1969 (1999 for treason and arson on a naval base). The last two people to be executed in the U.K. were Gwynne Evans and Peter Allen who were hanged on Friday the 13 1964. In my opinion I think the death penalty is wrong and it should not be used for whatever the causes. What if someone was wrongly accused? Some people argue that the death penalty will bring a closure to the victim’s family. They will be able to get on with their lives. They would not have the worry that it could happen to another family and they would feel slightly pleased that they had suffered in this way, the way they made there lost one suffer. However other people believe that suffering can be made in different ways. They think it would be a better punishment if someone would die rotting in prison and they believe that the convict would not be getting the easy way out. I believe that it would bring a closure to the victim’s family but how would the family of the convict feel. Isn’t hypocritical to kill someone and say killing is wrong? How would you feel if it had been a spur of the moment action?

Many people believe that execution is cheaper for society than a life sentences. They think that it cost nothing for someone to be given the death penalty. They also believe that keeping someone in prison for a long amount of time

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment or the death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. The judicial decree that someone be punished in this manner is a death sentence, while the actual process of killing the person is an execution. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences. As of 2010, methods permitted for use include beheading, electric chair, gas chamber, hanging, lethal injection, and shooting.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is perfectly natural for us to wish to take life of perpetrators who have taken a life of an innocent family member. If my husband or my child is murdered, there will be no justification or excuse for the killer’s actions. The life of a loved one has tragically ended by the murderer, and then I would wish nothing more than ending his life as well. It does not bring our loved ones back, but it is surely produces some closure for everyone who will be mourning the great loss for years to come. Interestingly enough, some victim’s families are against the death penalty as a punishment method. They believe that putting killers to death would be considered an easy and quick way out for them. Most murderers do not experience any remorse toward people they killed or the victim’s families. (www.mdcase.org). Therefore, to die by the means of a deadly injection would mean escaping very harsh prison environment for the rest of their lives. Moreover, some victim’s families also believe that spending life in horribly violent prison environment would make perpetrators suffer more and hopefully reflect on their wrong-doing for the rest of their miserable lives without any chance of getting out. For example, most cruel prison gangs very often eventually impose their punishments of child molesters or child rapist in very violent…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is the legal authorisation of killing a criminal. The death penalty was abolished in 1965 ; the last British death penalty case was closed on August 13th. Serious offences that would consequent to capital punishment are: Murder , drug trafficking , drive-by’s , murdering a police officer ,treason, terrorism and espionage. Some examples of execution methods are: Lethal injection, the gas chamber , electric chair , hangings and many more.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is death penalty? Death penalty is when a state or the government issues the punishment of execution to some one who has committed a crime. It has always been one of the most highly debated issues in the United States. Many Americans are against the capital punishment or commonly knows as the death penalty because they fear its too expensive or there are religious reasons to oppose the death penalty or some other reasons. But my point of view is just like the bible and what it says "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" meaning if you killed some body you ought to be killed also. Most people aren't worried about the life after committing crimes because they know that the laws aren't strict enough to make them to stop committing crimes. To these people, laws don't hold them back from doing what they want to do. Capital punishment is mainly used for murderers and other serious criminals dangerous to our society. People who oppose the capital punishment clearly don't feel the pain and the trouble the victims and their families has gone through. So, is capital punishment necessary? Yes, capital punishment deters crime and gives closure to families of the victim.…

    • 857 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Introduction Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is defined as the physical execution of a person by the state as punishment for a crime. The existence of the death penalty dates as early as the eighteenth century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon. The code outlines twenty-five different crimes for which the death penalty was applied. At this time, the means by which the death penalty was enacted included crucifixion, drowning, beating to death, burning alive, and impalement. However, by the tenth century A.D., hanging became the primary execution method in Britain.…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Keaton Capital Punishment

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although the death penalty pushes discipline and severe consequences for the crimes that have been committed, life in prison is more humane and less expensive. Many victims feel that the death penalty can give them closure, knowing that the culprit is dead. When we convict someone of a crime, it is not right to kill them. Prison could change them. If you do not use the death penalty, their families could still visit and maintain a relationship with them.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is the Permissible authorisation of executing someone who has committed an atrocious, unforgiveable and inhumane crime. The death penalty was removed from Great Britain in 1964-1965, however some countries, for example; China, Iran, North Korea and some states in the USA, still practice the use of the death penalty. Acts such as; genocide and general murders commonly result in the criminal offender being placed on death row. Some legal execution methods would be: Lethal injection or electric chair. In my opinion I believe the death penalty is an illogical, unreasonable and an absurd punishing system, and shouldn’t be re introduced into the UK. I am going to explain why below.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For instance, it is unfair to the criminals in which the evidence against them is weak and in which it was an accident. Executing a person who could possibly be innocent is morally wrong and inhumane. I believe that for the criminals to die in such a public and painful way is cruel and unusual. It is not an effective way of handing out justice. The death penalty can also keep the victim’s families stuck in an angry stage of grief. Moreover, the death penalty might bring the opposite of what survivors of crime most need; accountability, healing and closure. Those criminals have family and loved ones too. Some of them even have a wife and children, why should they suffer by seeing or knowing that their loved one is being sentenced to death?…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Death Penalty

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There are many differences in the way people view the death penalty. Some are against it and some agree with it. There have been many studies trying to prove or disprove a point regarding the death penalty. Some have regarded the death penalty as a hindrance, and some have regarded it as state sanctioned murder and not civilized. The death penalty has been linked to societies for hundreds of years. More recently, as we become more civilized, the death penalty has been questioned on if it is the correct way to so enforce justice on the people. The death penalty is a highly controversial subject. No one knows who’s right or who’s wrong-it’s fifty percent speculation and fifty percent research. It’s just a lot of thoughts and beliefs from people who have contributed to the death penalty controversy. Who’s right and who’s wrong? That is the question.…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas Death Penalty

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty has been and will always be one of the most controversial topics in life, with opposing sides for and against, the death penalty is still obscure to many. The official definition of death penalty is execution of an offender being sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of criminal offense. The terms capital punishment and death penalty are frequently used to mean the same thing, though some believe there is a small difference between the terms. Death penalty is referring to the penalty received while capital punishment is referring to merely the execution. Around the world, death penalty has been exercised thousands of times throughout many centuries, the first execution in America occurred in…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals. Maintaining each death row prisoner cost the taxpayers ninety thousand more per year than a prisoner in a general population. Getting rid of people on death row will save taxpayers a lot more money. It could be a cost effective way of getting rid of dangerous criminals and to keep the less violent criminals in for longer. Getting rid of people who are on a life sentence or on death row will save taxpayers a lot of money which could be spent on other things in…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty in Peru

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On the other hand, death penalty has pros and some are these. It is allowable because the criminal did murder an innocent victim, and therefore should be killed. As consequence, death penalty is going to stop criminals from murdering. Let the convicted murderer work for the public good for the rest of his/her life. Many people will agree that death penalty is just and fair. Additionally, the death penalty can lower crime, and is not an evil punishment, it’s the person who committed such a crime who deserves the death penalty.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A death penalty can also be served as a strong deterrent against potential criminals. Humans are naturally afraid of death, and would rethink again before offending the law. Death penalty can also be seen, as a way to console the victim’s families, should the criminal committed an act of murder. However, one could also argue that even if justice is served, we can never bring back the dead to life.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I personally think that the death penalty is unjust. Murder is murder no matter who is doing it. So if someone kills someone, does that give the judicial system the right to kill someone? In my opinion no, because all in all, it is still down right murder. I think that that life in prison is torture enough especially when you have people who have been wrongfully convicted of murder. Does the legal system have authorization to take innocent lives? Being that this scale is unbalanced, I believe that it more than right to leave judgement up to God. Follow this link to get more information on this subject http://deathpenalty.procon.org/ . The death penalty is costlier than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complicated…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics