For example, the government supporters in Turkey always express that they want death penalties. They may have reasons, but I don't think these reasons can be acceptable. The writer of Newsweek Conor Gaffey (2017) gives information about the issues in Turkey. The voice of people who want death penalty increase after the failed coup attempt in Turkey. These supporters think the punishment of some felonies needs to be death.The felonies could be betrayal to country, murders and so on. They think if these criminals somehow be released, they can commit these crimes again and the punishment of these heavy crimes shouldn't be only convicting. However, these ideas are so barbaric. You cannot kill a people no matter what s/he does. Moreover, these supporters think according to their religions and their religions give them right to use death penalties. As a belief, if their religions say them something, they must obey these rules. However, this way of trial will be so theocratic. Today's most common system is secular system and secular countries don't manage themselves according to religion rules because theocratic systems are very …show more content…
I think there is no reasonable for killing. Otherwise, living right is one of right that we fundamentally have so it cannot be ended by anyone. Instead of the death penalty there could be severe penalties that can be really disincentive. Moreover, countries should listen institutions like the UN and abolish death penalties for their dignity. As a result, there is no noteworthy explanation for the death penalty. Also, if a country wants to be a developing country, it should be careful about the punishment system. To keep it short words, we should just abolish death penalties without