Preview

Should The Government Have The Right To Live Or Die?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
711 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Should The Government Have The Right To Live Or Die?
The government has the power to choose who of their citizen gets to live or die. When you think about taking a life away from someone it’s never moral or acceptable in this time. What we do know is the government has been taking multiple lives away from their people. Even in The Declaration of Independence, they promised to protect the lives of their citizen, yet the government has been taking the lives of their citizen in two different ways. Firstly the government drafts people in a war. Secondly, the government has taken their citizen life away with the death penalty. The government force their citizens to leave their homes, jobs, and family. The government allows citizens like …show more content…
Many innocent people are put to death under the death penalty like In the article A Dad was executed for death of his three girls. Now a letter cast more doubts, it stated that the “death penalty opponents, Willingham case is among those that comes closest to providing the first time in modern era capital punishment that an innocent person has been put to death in the United States” (possibly 2). Just like many other cases like Willingham, this statement proves that innocent people are put to death for a crime they did not even commit. When the government kills an innocent person from a crime they did not commit. The government are taking another innocent persons lives away almost as if it was nothing. Nothing says injustice or fair treatment from the government then taking an innocent person life away. Innocence, is one of the reason why the government has no right to take someone life …show more content…
People who volunteered to fight for their country who knows the risk of dying but still willing to fight are the only person who should be able to fight in the war. You can't force people into going to a war they aren't willing to fight in. the government is taking away people lives, family, jobs, and living a normal life. War is never easy as people in the world stated that “war is nasty, war is fun, war makes you a man: war makes you dead” (O Brien 67). The government shouldn't put random people at risk because they think a draft would be fair. The government shouldn’t put random people at risk because they think a draft would be fair. The government wants people to think that the draft is fair and democratic, yet picking random innocent people to go into a place they never been to, and putting them under death is not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    because no innocent person deserves to die and whether other people like the government, did…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Most think that the justice system gets it right most of the time. Unfortunately this is not the case. Many people go to prison or end up on death row despite being innocent, like Anthony Graves. In 48 Hour’s “Grave Injustice” we see Anthony Graves’ case; Graves was put on death row for a crime he did not commit. In this case like many others out there the fault is not in the system itself but the people. In the Graves case there were many discrepancies that came to light after the conviction..…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Edward Freeland’s letters to the editor of The New York Times, he stated that “men do not act like brutes or devils without reason. ”1 During what would become known as “the largest civilian insurrection in American history”, the New York Draft riots highlighted a bleak and tumultuous time in this nation’s history.2 What motivated the rioters to do what they did has never been one concise answer. In his writings, Freeland set out to analyze the causes and consequences of the riots by investigating the relationships between class, race, and education in American society. Throughout American history, mandatory conscription has been utilized in times of war to ensure American victory and preservation.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Have you ever taken the time to think about how you feel about the draft? Do you feel it is the government’s right to tell you to serve in the military? In times of war there is always the possibility of a draft. Drafting for military purpose has dated back to the Thirteen Colonies and could still be used today. Although it has been in existence for a very long time the draft has been used in 5 major wars: the Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War and again for the Vietnam War.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement.” ( J.R.R. Tolkien). No one knows the exact number of innocent people that were executed. However, since 1973, 156 people Have been exonerated. In the article, Governor Ryan’s Execution Moratorium in Illinois: Killing the Innocent, Governor George Ryan reduced the sentences of inmates facing capital punishment in Illinois. The anti-death penalty citizens praised the governor. Many people are innocent on death row. The innocence projects work extremely hard help those wrongly convicted. The innocence project members are lawyers and good citizens who work to find the truth using DNA testing. Sadly, sometimes…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with the reinstitution of a military draft. In 1973 the military draft was lifted in the United States and with good reason. The United States should not rely on a draft to fill military vacancies but rely on recruitment. It is true that the military offers incentives and luxuries that some civilians could not afford otherwise such as food, shelter, and medical care. However, they are just that, incentives. The military is an option and should remain that way. Many enlist for different reasons, some with economical reasons, others with strong political urges, but they enlist out of their own desires, beliefs, and more importantly, free will. Some see the military as a way of life; others see it as the only way to educate themselves in a society where education is valued so highly. With rising tuition costs, many enlist in the reserves as a guarantee for their degree. College is costly and even with the aid of tuition assistance and can leave a graduate drowning in debt. These are all choices all college bound 18-25 year olds make and some just do not have the luxury of choosing.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first reason that we should not have drafts is that it violates human rights. We have the right to serve and if we don't want to then we simply don't have to. If we where to have a draft then you would be forced to serve even if you don't want to. Drafts take away are freedom to…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Military Draft No More

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The draft is needed so that military sacrifice and risk may be more equitably shared.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is this fair when we have equal opportunity for all?” this will never be a yes or no question because half agree and the other half is against it. One person said not all women are physically or mentally up for the job. As stated earlier that is a huge factor but are all men physically or mentally up for the job? No, we are stuck in the mindset that men are supposed to still protect us at the cost of their own life whenever there is a problem. That was then this is now women need to be prepared because one day they are not going to have another choice and the United States will never go down without a fight. So if it means drafting women next it will be done. Women are not too fragile we do a lot more than just chores and taking care of kids. When a man gets drafted and he has a wife and kids, the kids still lose their father the wife still loses her husband. Now switch it around a women has a husband and kids, if the women gets drafted does the husband not lose a wife and do the kids not lose their mother? No matter what if it came down to us needing to draft people into the military a mother, father, aunt, uncle, cousin, son or daughter someone will be lost. Regardless if they are male or female someone is…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy Vs Louisiana

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When I say innocent people go to jail or get assassinated over things they didn’t do, I am trying to say that, it is possible for it to happen. A prime example will be the case of Larry Griffin. Larry was executed in 1995. On June 26, 1980 in St. Louis, Missouri, 19-year-old Quintin Moss was killed in a drive-by shooting while allegedly dealing drugs on a street corner. The conviction was based largely on the testimony from Robert Fitzgerald, a white career criminal, who was at the scene at the time of the murder. He testified that he saw three black men in the car when shots were fired and that Griffin shot the victim through the window of the car with his right hand. This was Griffin’s attorney’s first murder trial and he did not challenge the…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas Yarris was a convicted of a capital crime and was supposed to be executed.However on January 16th he was released and all of his charges were dropped.This proves that someone who is completely innocent could be killed for no reason.Studies show that since 1973 more than 155 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence.This is the problem is that it's chosen by a jury and judge but i don't think that they should have the option of choosing.It is inhuman and leaves to many risks.…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are not many absolute truths in the world. Almost every point can be argued and justified. But if there is one truth universally recognized, one truth upon which societies the world over have been based on, it is that murder is wrong. The willful termination of a life is immoral. If we as a society accept that to be true, how then can we condone the death penalty? How is government sanctioned murder a moral option? The legal system is not fool proof, nothing man-made is. How then can we claim that an imperfect court of law, pervious to human error and persuasion, has the power to lay down the most perfectly irreversible solution of them all: death. Even after the appellate courts have been exhausted, it is possible for an innocent person to be convicted of a crime they did not do. If there is even that small possibility, how can we, in all good conscious, make it legal to put someone to…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Right to Die

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages

    People with terminal illnesses have unbearable pain and suffering. Large medical bills are accumulated when terminally ill patients go in-and-out of the hospital to try and ease their suffering. Thus, increasing economic affliction for the surviving family.…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay On The Drinking Age

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages

    All men have to sign up for the military draft at age 18 in case it is ever brought back into practice. People went off to fight for our country at 18, away from family and friends, in foreign territory with the uncertainty of life. A person risks life and limb in war, but they can’t come home and have a drink? Going off into war has serious consequences mentally, physically, and emotionally. This is a major life event if one chooses to do so. Why should a person be able to risk their life, but not be able to buy a drink on a weekend?…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The phrase “The right to die” means the ethical or institutional entitlement of the individual to commit suicide or to undergo voluntary euthanasia.( Right to die, - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 6 April 2012) It is one of the topics that has been debated over centuries. It starts from the 1950s, which arise from a small group of thinkers and writers in the United States and Europe, they began to argue about the choice that allows the patients to end their life by themselves in the case of surviving with those life support, in the case of the terminally ill, and many more. The acceptance of these arguments expand in the 1960s as the civil rights movement, the sexual revolution and other social movements helped to expand notions of personal freedom. While In the 1970s, this “right to die “has became an issue in the national stage due to the highly publicized 1975 case of Karen Ann Quinlan, who is a 21 year old woman that had fallen into a coma and she is unable to survive without the help of an artificial respirator. In this case Quinlan's family wants to remove her life support but it is thwarted by her doctor, leading to a lawsuit and a ruling by the Supreme Court that patients and by extension their families, they have a right to remove her life support. (Wired 2012) As “the right to die” has became an issue in the world, books begins to publish arguing about this topic, such as Managing Death by James M. Hoefler , Euthanasia and Law in Europe by John Griffiths, Heleens Weyers and Maurice Adams and many more.( James Leonard Park 2012) Law permitting doctors to end the life of certain terminally ill patients is created too, under the strict rules and procedures in several countries ,such as Netherlands , Belgium, Europe , Australia , United States , New Zealand and many more. Although it is approve and legalize by many countries but in my opinion, the right to die should not be considered a right because of several reasons.…

    • 2206 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays