Was the Vietnam “War” justified? In 1965, 3,500 United States Marines put boots on the ground in South Vietnam. The Marines being the first United States battle ready troops on the field in a skirmish that had been brewing for years. The comnie government of North Vietnam supported by the Soviet Union and the Chinese was confined in a battle with South Vietnam reinforced with the US in a Cold War proxy fight. The U S had been offering help as well as consultants to the South ever since the beginning of the 50s, gradually intensifying actions to include bombing runs and ground missions. As Rob Richy explains in the video lesson this week, the Vietnam War cannot even be considered an actual war for the simple fact that there was not even a war…
“The reason we invaded Iraq was for reasons far more than weapons of mass destruction. Saddam Hussein was a tyrant who waged many wars in the Middle East, supported and aided numerous Aab invasions of Israel, threatened to invade Saudi Arabia, overran Kuwait, and caused the UN to bring about sanctions against Iraq. Saddam was also known to have an extensive chemical weapons arsenal and has used several chemical weapons against his own people while suppressing many human…
However, in 1990, when Saddam Hussein of Iraq invaded neighboring Kuwait, President George Bush of the United States decided to take action. Iraq acquired a huge debt in her war against Iran, and the abundant oil supply in Kuwait was an attractive means of erasing this debt. With Iraq in control of a large amount of the World 's oil supply, the United States would be at Saddam Hussein 's mercy. In addition to the Kuwaiti oppression, the United States could not let this monopoly take place. President Bush commanded a prolonged series of bombings on Iraq which resulted in Hussein 's eventual withdrawal from Kuwait. This was not a war of containment, but it served a similar purpose in that it sought to prevent an aggressor from overtaking a weaker neighbor. Also, the United States fought for her oily supply, giving the war significant purpose in contrast to wide opinions concerning the Vietnam War (Schwartzkopf 55). Thus, the Gulf War received exponentially more praise and reestablished the validity of the Truman Doctrine (Schwartzkopf…
President Bush’s justification towards the invasion on Iraq in 2004 explicated that the main reason to invade Iraq was security measures. Bush was terrified for the citizens of his country and the rest of the world, as he thought Iraq was in control of nuclear weapons that could harm everyone. However, this was not a true reflection of America’s ambitions in Iraq. This essay will prove that America’s intentions into Iraq was largely the fact that Iraq was a major oil source for the world and if America could dominate this source they could have more authority than any other country. Bush’s administration also misstated information regarding Iraq’s possessions of any Weapons of Mass Destruction, and their links with Al Qaeda for this purpose.…
The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…
Saddam Hussein was one of the most brutal tyrants in the last hundred years. He is considered to be responsible for the death of nearly two million people. He first ordered for the killing of about 100,000 Kurds-Iraqi citizens based in the north of the country- because he believed them to be a threat to him. Then he followed that up with the ordered killing of tens of thousands of Shi’i Muslims and thousands more Kurds in 1991. These death counts, as high as they are, don’t even include the deaths from two of the bloodiest wars in Iraqi history. If you were to add up all these deaths, Saddam would be responsible for approximately more than 2 million deaths. This obviously shows that Saddam Hussein was the cause of the eventual war against the US.…
‘’ISIS is known for killing millions of innocent people to turn them into Muslims. Or those who are standing in the way from their main goal – to create an Islamic State. ‘’(Wikipedia)…
On March 20th of 2003, the United States launched an attack on Iraq. Although the war had went fairly well for the United States in the beginning by the summer of 2003, with the rising death toll and the weapons of mass destruction still unfound, many began to question the intelligence that had supported the war (222). The Iraq…
The U.S led Iraq and Afghanistan wars have received praises and criticisms of different measures. The war was fought for almost a decade, starting back in 2003. In the case of Iraq war, the cause of the conflict was suspicion by the United States and United Kingdom that Iraq had in its possession Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) that it intended to use in case of war between nations. This was based on the past experience where Iraq had used WMD against Kurds. Despite the fact that an investigation by the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) found no evidence of claims that Iraq indeed had WMD, The United States and United Kingdom went ahead and invaded Iraq on the 20th of…
The reasons given for the original invasion of Iraq (Bush, 2003) mainly surrounded that there was supposedly "irrefutable" evidence that Iraq had, and was prepared to use, Weapons of Mass Destruction. The claim was that these weapons were an imminent danger to the USA. Once America invaded Iraq, and the initial success was replaced by a Vietnam-like war of attrition against an unseen enemy. The original reason for the invasion of Iraq was either mistaken or deliberately misleading, so no more soldiers should be lost in fighting for a war that was not needed.…
The United States seems to have deemed themselves as the "Peace Keepers" of the world. Somewhere down the line of history, they have decided that there is a need to regulate any serious issues that are occurring outside of the country itself. Daryl Press defines Isolationism as, "Isolation avoids economic and diplomatic engagement and eschews potential profits from the global economy and the enrichment that sharing ideas and cultures can offer." Basically he is saying that the phrase foreign affair isn't specifically limited to wars. The term also includes financial aid, helping feed, clothe, and house third world countries in need.…
Saddam Hussein was a member of the Baathist Party so in order to remove his presents in the country’s infrastructure the United States removed all Baathist affiliates from their positions. While on the surface this seemed like a good idea, there were crucial details that were not taken into account. Details such as: the importance of the workers affiliated with the Baathists, and the reasons why workers associated themselves with the Baathist party. After the De-Baathification of Iraq many very important shoes were left unfilled, so the military replaced them with their own. “Now you have an American Soldier, who majored in Art History running the power grids, or someone else who is highly unqualified.” As these issues came to light the U.S. started letting these qualified Iraqi Citizens return to their jobs. New information exposed another oversight within this decision: The United States did not take into account that many Iraqi citizens joined the Baathist party out of necessity. Similar to Nazi Germany people affiliated with the Baathist party in order to get promoted and develop their career and not necessarily out of principal. While it was necessary to remove Saddam’s followers it should not have been at the cost of the country. In order to avoid this set back, the U.S. should have done more research on the party and the country’s infrastructure so that they could have made the transition smoother and prevented the removal of employees that were key components to the Iraqi…
Our decision to invade Iraq was just. How the idea was sold to the American public was not, this in my opinion was the administrations greatest fault. There is no doubt that Iraq posed a significant threat to our nation and others and that its leader needed to be ousted. Whether the preemptive decision to invade was based on the belief that they possessed WMD is, in my opinion, inconsequential. Ethically, we know that utilitarians would evaluate the…
The United States is known as one of the most powerful countries in the world, which can be something great for the nation but, it can also be the worst enemy for another country. With the power that the United States have, there can happen many things that are going to affect negatively to other countries. That was clearly demonstrated when the United States leaders decided to invade Iraq in 2003, Leader of the nation such as George W. Bush who was the President that time, he argued that there were many reasons why the U.S should attack Iraq. Some of those are; Iraq was was a threat for the national safety of the United States and other countries; also, Iraqis being overpressed by Saddam which makes their system non-democratic. The administration…
The United States should empower the Afghan Government to actively pursue peace negotiations with the Taliban because total victory is neither plausible nor affordable. U.S. and NATO have battled the Taliban for sixteen years. Some defense analysts estimate the Afghan war cost the U.S. between $4 to $6 trillion dollars. Furthermore, thousands of Americans sacrificed their lives and limbs in pursuit of victory against the Taliban. Yet, the Taliban insurgency remains resilient today. The U.S. military strategy is unsuccessful and will not work as long as Pakistan harbors the Afghan Taliban and there’s a corrupt unsustainable Afghan government. Therefore, the U.S. should place more emphasize and prioritization on diplomatic and economic actions to establish a peace agreement with…