Preview

Shrank After The Russian Revolution

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1017 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Shrank After The Russian Revolution
For the first three years following the Revolution, the institutions of Russian capitalism were smashed to pieces. Besides, in Russia agricultural production shrank, industrial production was paralyzed, and transportation was disorganized. The shortage in the Soviet economy first appeared in the form of hunger and absolute paucity. Everyday life was transformed into the struggle for existence, and people had to make tremendous effort to obtain foods, fuels and other necessaries of life through long queues and expeditions to production areas.
While a number of estimations have been made about the true scale of Soviet economy, there is no difference of opinion over the point that the production seriously declined during 1918-1920. According to an estimate by Kafengauz made in the NEP period, the overall industrial production of 1920 shrank into merely about 15% of 1917. In a book overviewing the posit revolutionary economic process, Bukharin wrote that “a priori, it must be clear that the proletarian revolution is inevitably accompanied by an extremely profound decline in the productive forces”.
Preceding the Revolution, the World War lasting for three years had caused shortage of foods, fuels and transportation capacities. Especially, the foods shortage in the capital
…show more content…
This huge wave of land redistribution, carried out by peasants themselves through their land communities, swallowed not only lands of great landowners but also lands of independent peasants who had until then produced mainly for sales in markets. Although additional distribution of land portions slightly increased the average area of peasant holdings, agriculture lost its connection with markets and industrial production. As a whole, peasant holdings were leveled out into small-scale self-sufficient

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    At the end of the nineteenth century, Russia had been plunged into depression, because the government was forced to print more and more money which caused a rise in inflation. In addition, because Russia was at war with Turkey, over thirty per cent of the government’s expenditure was being spent on the armed forces, whilst another thirty per cent was being lost on debt interest, which left little money for education or social welfare. Ivan Vyshnegradskii, the finance minister from 1887- 1892 began attempting to rescue the government finances. He reduced imports and imposed tariffs on imported goods, which forced peasants to sell more and more grain which they could not produce, this lead to a famine which overwhelmed large parts of the country in 1891. Russia was also lagging behind many of the Western countries at the time in terms of industrial development too. When count Sergei Witte was appointed finance minister in 1892, there was a desperate need to decrease inflation, improve infrastructure and encourage foreign investment. However, it is debatable how successful the policies introduced by Witte were in modernising the Russian economy.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Russian economy is universally declared to have been a thoroughly backward prior to 1890s therefore it is highly likely that there was economic improvement in the given period; however the extent of this is difficult to define due to the varying manifestations of economic improvement and the independence with which they may occur. The finance minister during this period was Sergei Witte, and to him the majority of the improvements are credited, yet the improvement was not universal. Whether this was him personally or simply a product the awful conditions which the Russian economy rose from is to be decided.…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Russia’s industrialisation as a result of the reforms of 1891 proved crucial in the fall of the old order. After Witte’s reforms of the late 1890s the population of Petrograd doubled between 1890 and 1910. With the working population in the cities it gave revolutionary groups the advantage of having a large group of frustrated workers in a confined space. In relation to the events of 1917 February revolution the population density allowed the numbers participating in the violent revolts to reach colossal numbers. With the Tsar on the war front, the masses persuaded the soldiers to join the revolutionary forces and by the time he came back, it was too late. Cities such as Petrograd and Moscow weren’t designed for the population increase, and as such workers were living in crowded dirty, overcrowded apartments. These living conditions lead to the frustrations throughout the revolutionary groups. Witte’s reforms converted a large portion of peasants into proletariat. As the tension raised in 1917 that same industrial working class responded with strikes. The strikes started by the Pulitov Steal workers on the 18th of February 1917 started out with one company, but the frustration with the Tsar wasn’t just in one factory. In exactly 12 days one strike had turned into a revolution the reason was that the reforms of Witte and Stolypin .With the peasants now in factories it ment they lacked farmers and had nobody to farm the good harvests in the war years, in fact the harvests of 1915 and 1916 were the best of the century. Without the food to feed a starving nation, the Russian government was in trouble and with this Wittes reforms that were designed…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some small change came under war communism in 1918. The town houses of the rich were taken over and the living space divided amongst poor families, which meant that the select few benefited from the Bolshevik rule. This aspect can be seen as an improvement when looking at the living conditions endured under the Tsarist period. Because there had been little workers before Witte’s industrialisation, the population of cities dramatically expanded. This expansion had not been organised or supervised, meaning that the facilities accommodating the influx of workers were inadequate. Between 1881 and 1914, workers were overcrowded in insanitary wooden tenements with poor health services and this continued in World War One. Disruption of supplies meant little fuel and a shortage of food. These living conditions can be seen as a change compared to Tsarist Russia as the urban proletariat had barely developed in this era, so they would have not endured overcrowding. In 1917, this series of bad working conditions were set to continue. Sanitary conditions were appalling and fuel for heating was again short. Less than a third of diet came from state provided rations and food prices rocketed in 1919, this resulted in a large scale desertion of towns in favour of the country side. Under Stalin, there was a large degree of continuity for working conditions. Stalin, however, would disagree: ‘Life has become…

    • 2033 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    heyo potao

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Describe and analyze the long-term social and economic trends in the period 1860 to 1917 that prepared the ground for revolution in Russia.…

    • 1486 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By 1917, the Russian economy was in poor shape and near complete destruction because of the war effort. Food shortages were rampant which brought about civil unrest.…

    • 3026 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia became very dependent on peasant labor. In both of these countries, the farmland’s economy suffered due to little pay for farmers and the excessive hard work. Mongolian rulers and conquerors horded precious metals, depriving them from the countries’ economy. Paper money started to be used widely and caused some inflation.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were massive socio-economic changes taking place . This created a new class of factory workers . The working class , mostly the peasants - who comprised of 84% of the Russian population - were moved to the city to work in factories . Little could have been done about this as products had to be manufactured in the country , as trade routes were cut off due to WWI . On one hand , due to Tsar Nicholas II autocratic policies, there were no trade unions,to look out workers rights. For that reason living and working conditions were very bad . Workers worked for 14 hours a day and slept in overcrowded lodging houses , as illustrated by Father Gapon in 1905. On the other hand if the workers were treated better , they wouldn't have been so quick to go against the Tsar . His epathy further allienated his…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However there was a significant change in the agriculture of Russia in 1906-14. Stolypin succeeded in creating a more prosperous class of peasants free from the restrictions of the commune. To leave a commune, a peasant no longer needed permission from the majority of its members. The Peasant Land Bank was instructed to loan money to freed peasants and redemption payments were cancelled in 1907. In 1910, any commune where no land had been redistributed since 1861 was…

    • 1067 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the soldiers pillaged the towns, the people had no more belonging or money and so poverty became an even larger problem in Russia. Throughout these events, the people had no say and no way to change their position. Their rights were stripped from them and the common people were forced to live as slaves for the bolshevik party. During the Russian Revolution, there was a great amount change. The Leadership and the ideas and goals of the country changed but the issues and rights of the common people did…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tensions were rising as the Russian Revolution was getting closer to a start. Russian people were not better off after the revolution than they were before. The Russian Revolution led to many changes under the Russian rule. The first change was that the serfs were "freed." The second reason was when the provisional government failed and made the people fight against their wishes. The third reason is when the czar kept on making serious mistakes.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin himself justified his policy of rapid industrialisation and collectivisation at the 1926 Party Congress as one that sought to achieve ' the transformation of our country from an agrarian to an industrial one, capable by its own efforts of producing the necessary means of production.' This socialist notion of economic autarky, although admirable and unifying in its intentions, would indeed inevitably bring about damaging effects for the people of Russia. But how intensive and extensive was this damage - and was damage the only significant effect for the Russian people?…

    • 1864 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays