Preview

Siegel Vs. New England Merchants National Bank

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
339 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Siegel Vs. New England Merchants National Bank
Stephen Patton
Legal Brief #1
18SEPT2011

1. Case Name, Citation, and Court
Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982
Mass. Lexis 1559 (Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts)

2. Key Facts
A. David Siegel maintained a checking account with New England Massachusetts National Bank.
B. On September 14, Siegel drew and delivered a $20,000 check payable to Peter Peters. C. The check was dated November 14.
D. Peters deposited the check in his personal banking account.
E. On September 17, the bank paid the check and charged it against Siegel's account.
F. Siegel discovered that the check had been paid and informed the bank that the check was postdated for November 14.
G.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. $9500 in services was preformed, with $4100 paid for in cash, and $5400 billed through Accounts Receivable…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    A) The textbook states that 30 percent of customers pay on the 10th, 40 percent pay on the 13th and 30 percent pay on the 40th day after purchase.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.Should Louise Serrate cashed the check before Donald Lovekamp expired. I think Lousie Serrate should cashed that check at the time she received it. Donald Lovekamp specifically told her, that belongs to her, because she returned after a divorce to stay with him. He was specific about his wish and made clear that she can cash the check if something would have happened to him. I am not sure if that was a smart decision.…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Any Kind Checks Cashed

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When the second check of $5,700.00 was presented the check cashing company had been in contact with Talcott getting his verbal approval for cashing a check. As a result, Any Kind Check Cashed Inc. satisfied the good faith prerequisites for a holder in due course.…

    • 832 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tort and Bad Boy

    • 3317 Words
    • 14 Pages

    | |Did the bank owe obligation to grandma, and not rely on the letter (yes, 2138) |…

    • 3317 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The court reasoned that OCGA ß 11-3-403 is the applicable statue in this case, but there are different versions of OCGA ß 11-3-403. The 1995 version was interpreted in Kolodkin v. Cohen where the court found that an individual signing a check drawn on a business account could be personally liable if the check was not honored by the bank. The 1996 version [OCGA ß 11-3-402(c)] was interpreted by Peterson where the court held that an individual signing a check drawn on a business account is not personally liable if the check is not honored by the bank.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Acc 561 Final Exams Help

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages

    18) Sylvester Company requires clients to pay in advance for legal services. One such client made a $4,000 payment on May 1, and Sylvester Company recorded this transaction in the appropriate liability account. As of May…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Writing Exercises

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages

    3b) Please record the $500 payment from January 6th. My previous statement shows that it has not been done.…

    • 1529 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order for the clients to receive their checks, each person must complete the following:…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    White Collar

    • 679 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Weaver, Jay (July 25, 2011). “Joel Steinger, accused in $1.25B fraud, awaits trial in mansion.”…

    • 679 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turd

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Unum moved that Apollo advance $1,000,000 to Mr. Lancaster’s personal secretary as a personal loan to cover personal legal expenses related to her previous employer. Mr. Unum further suggested that the promissory note plus accrued interest of 1% per year be due on June 30, 2048. Mr. Lancaster suggested that it be recorded in “other receivables,” rather than “employee advances” so as to not trouble shareholders with…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 3. Chaikin, D. 2011, Bank as Depository and Bank’s Duties, CLAW 2204 at The University of Sydney, Semester 1.…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheques Act Assignment

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The issues with this cheque was that the cheque for $90,000 drawn by Dr Duck was delivered to Ken Broome, on the 9th of January 2012, even though it was agreed to by both parties to be banked on the 30th of January 2012. However, despite this agreement, Mr. Broome deposited the cheque on the 15th of January 2012. To determine whether this cheque is valid, it must be examined whether or not the complies with the definition of a cheque in s10(1) . Then effect of depositing a post-dated cheque must also be examined under The Act, to determine its validity.…

    • 2052 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    0452 s12 qp 22 1

    • 2520 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Write your Centre number, candidate number and name on all the work you hand in.…

    • 2520 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The contract for sale which Macbeth had entered with Weetocrunch Ltd is a separate contract with that of the contract entered with the banks with regards to the documentary credits. For the purposes of this question, we are only dealing with the contract of the documents between Macbeth and the confirming bank, Noddy Bank. Noddy bank had been authorized in this case by the issuing bank, Toytown Bank to pay the beneficiary, also known as the seller, Macbeth for the goods he had shipped to Weetocrunch. It is only upon presentation by Macbeth of valid documents that complies with the terms and requirements stated in the Letter of credit that had been opened by Toytown Bank on behalf of Weetocrunch, that he can receive his payment. As it is the letter of credit acts as some form of safeguard for seller that he will receive his payment as once the bank opens the letter of credit, they are under a contractual obligation to pay the seller upon presentation of complying documents. In this case, it can be seen that the documents presented by Macbeth had been rejected twice by the bank, first on the grounds that the documents are not original and secondly where the description of the goods in the bill of lading differs. For that we refer to the body known as Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (UCP) which governs the practice of documentary credit.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays