Preview

Siegligence Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
758 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Siegligence Case Study
In this negligence case brought by a former tenant Rosetta Taylor, the Defendants Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., d/b/a Park Bluff Apartments move for summary judgment on plaintiff’s claim of negligence and breach of duty. The defendants move for summary judgment based on an affirmative pleading of the defense of the statute of limitations. Tex. R. Civ. P. 94; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 16.003(a) (West 2002). Defendants contend that the statute of limitations has run and bars any and all claims. Plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations has not run due to misnomer and misidentification that the statute of limitations is tolled and does not apply as any amended petition relates back to the date of the original petition. Defendant …show more content…
v. Perez, 819 S.W.2d 470, 471 (Tex. 1991). Defendants offer that there is no such duty owed to the plaintiff and that as a matter of law this element is negated. Under, Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. Cain, 972 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. 1998) defendant will demonstrate there is lack of proximity, recency, frequency, similarity, and publicity of crimes. This lack of factors offers that there is no evidence to support the element of …show more content…
From then and until she moved out at the end of her last apartment lease at Park Bluff on June 30, 2013, she performed or substantially performed all of her obligations under her lease. At all times during which Taylor was a resident of the Park Bluff Apartments, Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., owned and managed the apartments. (Pl.’s 1st Am. Pet., 3.)
On Saturday January 21, 2012, suffered a personal injury which accrued a cause of action. Plaintiff did not file any suit with the court until January 14, 2014. (Pl.’s Original Pet., 1). After filing, Defendant Vista Views Property informed in writing of a defect of parties. (Def.’s Original Answer, 1). It was at this time plaintiff realized a defect of parties. Plaintiff filed an amended petition on February 18, 2014 which changed the defendants to Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., This amended petition also nonsuited previous defendants. (Pl’s 1st Am. Pet., 1, February 18, 2014). It was at this time Defendants responded with original answer. (Def.’s Original Answer March 14, 2014). On March 27, 2014 Pierce Connery, president of Vista Views Leasing Properties Inc., stated that he received no notice of lawsuit until mid-February. He further stated that the nature of his job and in the normal course of employment would ensure that he received notice immediately after service

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the case of White v. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern, Mrs. White is suing Mr. Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern in the death of her husband, Mr. White. Mr. Edward Hard was a patron of the tavern the night of the accident with Mr. and Mrs. White. Mr. Hard was in a relationship with Mrs. White before she married Mr. White. Mr. Hard saw Mr. and Mrs. White leave the tavern on this night and followed them out the door. Mrs. White observed Mr. Hard drinking several alcoholic beverages while they were there. When Mr. and Mrs. White where leaving Mr. Hard confronted Mr. White telling him that “she should be my wife” and “this is not over.” After Mr. and Mrs. White got in their car and were leaving the establishment, Mr. Hard followed them driving recklessly. He was swerving across the road, driving in the opposite lane, and hitting mailboxes. His recklessness and inability to drive due to being intoxicated resulted in him crashing into Mr. and Mrs. White’s vehicle ultimately killing Mr. White and severely injuring Mrs. White. This court case took place in United States District Court in the Northern District of Indiana. This is court case number 82A04-8876-CB285, White vs. Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern. The lawyers in this case are Benjamin Walton, Jordan Van Meter who represent the defendants Patrick Gibbs and O’Malley’s Tavern and Jackson Welch, Amanda Babot who represent the plaintiff Debbie White.…

    • 1382 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Defendant, in turn, has filed a countersuit against The Company on the grounds of wrongful termination. Information about the termination was given to The Defendant after she reported that she would be requiring additional time off due to high-risk factors related to her…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue: Did the statute of limitations begin to run when the defendant first suspected harm had resulted from the product or when her suspicions were validated by a medical…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff, Margaret Hollar was not employed at the time of the accident in question. The plaintiff had a history of having an L4-S1 discectomy and laminectomy. Ms. Hollar testified that she had a history of severe headaches, which began when she was 20 years of age. The plaintiff was involved in an accident in 2001 in which she slipped on ice and injured her neck and back. That injury led to her back surgery, as a result of her chronic back pain she was unable to return to work. The plaintiff has a history of severe depression and anxiety and inpatient psychiatric treatment.…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The plaintiff sued the defendants, claiming that she was sexually assaulted and beaten by hospital employees while she was hospitalized. The defendants were granted a dismissal of the case for non pros. The defendants claimed that the plaintiff failed to meet her requirement to file a certificate of merit within 60 days. As a result, the Court of Common Pleas,…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 05-3708 > , Defendant-Appellee. N On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. No. 02-00708—James G. Carr, Chief District Judge. Argued: June 23, 2006 Decided and Filed: July 22, 2008 Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge; BELL, Chief District Judge.* _________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves, LAW OFFICE, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellee ON BRIEF: Joseph R. Wilson, ASSISTANT UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Toledo, Ohio, for Appellant. Spiros P. Cocoves,…

    • 4533 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I spoke with Craig Ribbens, who is one of the insureds’ long-time tenants. Mr. Ribbens was cooperative and offered to help in any way that he could. However, the information that he provided was not very beneficial to our defense. The house that the plaintiffs rented is one of five that the insureds own in a small compound. Mr. Ribbens informed us that he did not know the plaintiffs, but heard from other tenants that they moved out because there was mold throughout their house. Although he never saw the mold, and has seen none in the house that he rents, he occasionally smells mold in his house in the past.…

    • 236 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court decided that plaintiff's complaint states a cognizable cause of action against the defendants for the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint is denied.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Weintraub Genshlea & Sproul, Rosemary Kelley, Charles L. Post, and William S. Jue, for Plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi.…

    • 1548 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper I am going to take a look at the case state of Maryland v Alonzo King. I will take a look at what accomplice liability is and criminal liability and how they are related to the case of Maryland v King. How different aspects of crime differ from one another and there direct correlation to this case.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Motion in Limine

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONIAL EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED GANG AFFILIATED COMMENTS BECAUSE OF THE PREJUDICIAL EFFECT OUTWEIGHS THE PROBATIVE VALUE OF THE EVIDENCE…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brief and explanation: In 1984, appellant Elaine Tennimon, as personal representative of decedent’s estate filed suit for wrongful death against appellee helicopter manufacturer. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of appellee helicopter manufacturer on the ground that appellant’s wrongful death suit was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant, Elaine Tennimon appeals the district courts grant of summary judgment in favor of Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As offenders are permitted to make deals for crimes committed because of lack of evidence, the defendants lack of knowledge of the judicial process, financial disparity, pressure to close a case, or lack of proper representation; the…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction: If Mr. Thomson sues the City of Pasadena for a dangerous condition on public property, he must prove there was an actual dangerous condition. Mr. Thomson must also prove that employee negligence was involved and that the city had actual notice of a dangerous condition or constructive notice.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Satyam Fraud

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages

    2. According to the case of the plaintiff, the first defendant was offered as Programmer Trainee vide letter dated 26-03-1993 on a consolidated stipend of Rs.2,250/- per month and the first defendant signed the letter of appointment on 05-04-1993 agreeing the terms and he underwent training. As guaranteeing the due performance of the terms, the second defendant stood as a surety and both the defendants executed a surety bond on 27-04-1993 and subsequently, the first defendant joined on 03-05-1993, at programme training and was paid stipend at the rate of Rs.2,250/- per month and after successful completion of the training, he was absorbed into the plaintiff company as Software Engineer vide appointment letter, dated 15-12-1993 with retrospective effect i.e., from 01-10- 1993. But, however, the first defendant left the services abruptly from 12-07- 1994 onwards. As per the terms of the contract, the defendants have to pay liquidated damages of Rs.2,00,000/- and stipend charges and also the expenses incurred by the plaintiff. Totally, the plaintiff claimed a sum of Rs.2,78,500/- as due, but confined to the liquidated damages of Rs.2,00,000/-.…

    • 2280 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays