Preview

Silkwood Whistleblowing Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
631 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Silkwood Whistleblowing Case Study
Silkwood Whistleblowing means that someone is using their ethical standards to tell on some unethical procedures or practices at work or at home. It is sometimes hard to decide when to blow the whistle and it all depends on someone’s own ethical standards. Some companies know about the wrong doings, but rather ignore it then try to fix it. They expect employees just to keep working and not say anything about the unethical issues that occur. Most of the companies that have unethical issues know about them and either think that it is ok or believe that it is the only way they can make a profit. Unethical behavior has its way of coming out to the open eventually. In the Silkwood whistleblowing case it cost Karen Silkwood her life for trying to do the right and ethical thing. She was working for nuclear plant and found a lot of health and safety violations that she was trying to get out in the open. On her way to a friend that worked for the newspaper her car …show more content…
It can start with that his boss will take care of the problem right away or he tells the employee not to worry about it, because it isn’t anything major. The employee decides to go to the next higher boss up after the first one told him not to worry about it. This still doesn’t get him anywhere and he is finally at the owner and that doesn’t change anything. Since most of the employees and managers seem to think that there is nothing wrong and don’t want that employee to keep saying anything else about it, they give him an ultimatum. He is given the choice of either drop the whole matter or lose his job. I believe that there is more unethical behavior going on in today’s companies then anyone can imagine. It is hard to find a new job, so a lot of employees rather not say too much or anything about any unethical behavior so they can support their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    This incident Challenger present us a case study in organizational communication, ethics and culture as it promotes or discourages necessary communication and the ethics of whistle blowing.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to DeGeorge, for whistle-blowing to be considered ethical there first must be a serious harm that the whistle-blowing aims to prevent, which is greater than the harm it causes the firm and stakeholders. In this case, the corrupt activities are very serious and would have posed a greater harm going undetected than the negative media attention and charges brought against the firm. DeGeorge’s second condition states that the whistle-blower is required to first attempt to prevent…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tim Barnett, Assistant Professor of Management at Louisiana Tech University, wrote an article expressing why he thinks companies should adopt a whistleblowing policy. Whistleblowers are individuals that call attention to possible wrongdoing and are exposed to a great deal of controversy. Some believe whistleblowers sacrifice themselves, professionally and personally to reveal practices that are fraudulent or harmful to the public. Others believe they are just disgruntled employees who are accusing people that have mistreated them. The truth probably lies somewhere between the two opinions. In some ways it is beneficial to have whistleblowers out there because they…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    PHI2397 Essay

    • 1839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I am a manager of MBI computers in Canada. Like any other computer companies, we have placed our factories abroad for lowing cost. I found that our company is using illegal child labour in dangerous working conditions for our manufacturing line in Mexico through classified documents of MBI computers. On the other side, the cheap labour in Mexican manufacturing facility is necessary for us to compete with the other companies in the whole Canadian market. To consider blowing the whistle or not is not only regarding to the company, but it also very important to myself. As far as I analyze through 4 aspects of view in comprehensive situations: Relativist, Utilitarian, Kantian and Virtue Ethicist.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    (Raybeck, 2010) This misconduct can be in the form of: a violation of any law, rule, or regulation; gross mismanagement or waste of funds; abuse of authority within the workplace; as well as specific danger to public health and safety. Whistleblowers can be employees, suppliers, contractors, clients or any individual who somehow becomes aware of illegal activities taking place in a business either through witnessing the behavior or being told about it. They may hold a position that will enable them to know exact what type of wrongdoing has occurred within an organization. They can remain report wrong doing confidentially; however, they are able to attend any proceedings related to the…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Whistle blowing is also one of the ethical issues users can use and relate to. This is when an…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doing what’s right is never an easy decision one when it comes to work. However, when it comes to whistleblowing, this may be the hardest choice that someone will ever have to make in their life. Handling a whistleblower claim means dealing with the possibility that repercussions may come in the terms of unemployment, drop of income, loss of friendships, and reputation. The choice of a whistleblower can be impossible to make, in terms, of how they are going to bring to higher authorities.…

    • 84 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When faced with a difficult situation of morals, choice, and possible destruction of a person’s protection and survival, individuals find themselves in a formidable situation. This is a common occurrence for people who become known as a whistleblower. There is a problem in the United States with protection of individuals for whistleblowing in the workplace, and not enough is being done for these individuals. Whistleblowing is increasing and has become more common, more frequent, and sometimes dangerous. Individuals could potentially face the inability of obtaining another job because they are stigmatized as a whistleblower. This paper will focus on two questions: How does the society’s view support whether someone will blow the…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mike Rich

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The whistleblower poses no single entity, whether it being a single person or a business as a whole, to count itself immune to the dangers of corruption or malfeasance. Those who blow the whistle can neither risk the silencing of themselves for reasons of concrete evidence that question the proper moral and ethical interests of the public eye. According to Sissela Bok, “’Whistleblowing’ is a new label generated by our increased awareness of ethical conflicts encountered at work. Whistleblowers sound an alarm from within the very organization in which they work, aiming to spotlight neglect or abuses that threaten the public interest.” Take Frank Serpico, for example, a man whom was willing to risk his life, yet alone his career, to sound the alarm on the corruption within the very organization for which he worked for, the New York Police Department. Here in my discussion, we will examine and discuss Serpico’s case in correlation to the points made by Sissela Bok’s discussion on whistleblowing.…

    • 2507 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the nineteenth century a legal rule was developed giving employer’s unfettered power to “dismiss their employees at will for good cause, for no cause or for cause morally wrong, without being thereby guilty of a legal wrong.” (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). This legal rule is commonly known as Employment-At-Will and ultimately the employer has the rights to sever the employer-employee relationship at any given time for any given reason and whether or not the employee thinks wrongful separation. It is a topic that is debated for many years and in today’s current economy and unemployment rate steadily increasing “Employment-at-will” is a doctrine that is being used more frequently as employers experience their present day lows. Employers however have to keep in mind the other that in 1960, federal civil rights laws created remedies against employers who fire workers because of their race, national origin, color, religion, sex, age, or disability (Halbert, 2012, p. 49). Later, in 1970s and 1980s, federal and state statutes include protection from retaliation for employees who report violations of environmental or workplace safety laws and those individuals are commonly known as “whistleblowers”. In essence, whistle blowers are typically long term, highly loyal employees who feel strongly that their company should do the right thing, because in the wave of scandal with major firms such as Enron and World.Com; Congress enacted corporate fraud reform legislation which provides provisions to protect those who report financial misconduct in publicly traded companies. This law is known as Sarbanes-Oxey, or SOX (Halbert, 2012, p. 50).…

    • 1727 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The important decision maker in this situation is obviously John Smith. He needs to decide whether to perform these unethical practices or leave the company and work for an employer who does not request their employees to perform unethical practices. The stakeholders involved are the employees, the…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    A whistle-blower is an organisation member (former or current) who discloses illegal, immoral or illegitimate practices under the control of their employers, to other persons or organisations that may be able to take and effect action (Miceli & Near, 1984). In the case which is given to us, Cynthia Cooper, who worked in WorldCom, was the whistle-blower when she revealed the truth regarding the malpractice in some accounting treatment taking place in WorldCom. But we can see from the case that she had to face a lot of pressure exposing this error because her reporting boss Scott Sullivan, the CFO of the company, himself was involved in doing the fraud. So, for Cynthia, going against the fraud was like going against her boss.…

    • 1936 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the code of ethics, the employees are encouraged to expose any misconducts or unethical issues in the company. The company has also established a certain department, the Global Compliance Division or Legal Department, as the platform for reporting any violation of the code, and it also helps the employees to identify and escalate potential ethical issues. Meanwhile, the company has also set up the Non-Retaliation Policy which strictly prohibits the retaliation against anyone who reports in good faith a possible violation of the Code. Under those policies and procedures, the employees will feel easy to voice out if they found something going in the wrong track.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whistle blowing is an attempt of an employee or former employee of a company to reveal what he or she believes to be a wrongdoing in or by a company or organization. Whistle blowing tries to make others aware of practices that are considered illegal or immoral. If the wrongdoing is reported to someone in the company it is said to be internal. Internal whistle blowing tends to do less damage to the company. There is also external whistle blowing. This is where the wrongdoing is reported to the media and brought to the attention of the public. This type of whistle blowing tends to affect the company in a negative way because of bad publicity. It is said that whistle blowing is personal if the wrongdoing affects the whistle blower alone (like sexual harassment), and said to be impersonal if the wrongdoing affects other people. Many people whistle blow for two main reasons: morality and revenge.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Secret

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Some people have argued that whistle blowing is never justified because employees have absolute obligations of confidentiality and loyalty to the organization for which they work. People who argue this way see no difference between employees who reveal trade secret by selling information to competitors and whistleblower who disclose activities harmful to others. They nullify the principle that one ought to refrain from whistle blowing because speaking out would cause harm to the organization.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays