D3.1 Active safety applications specifications
Project contract n: Workpackage, Workpackage title Task, task title: Deliverable nr: Deliverable title: Deliverable type: Document preparation date: Authors
FP6 – 2005 – TRANSPORT – 4 - 031348 WP3, PTW Active Safety T3.1, Active safety concept definition D3.1 Active safety applications specifications PUBLIC Deadline: 31-07-2007 E. Bianco, E. Deregibus, C. Liberto Begoña Pérez Magallón José Maria Nacenta M. Pieve, O. Di Tanna A. Jarlmark O. Hoffmann
CRF CIDAUT NZI PIAGGIO OHLINS CONTI
Consortium: PIAGGIO & C. SpA, Fundación para la Investigación y Desarrollo en Automoción, Continental Teves AG&Co. oHG, Centro Ricerche Fiat, Technical University of Prague, DALPHIMETAL ESPAÑA S.A., DEKRA Automobil GmbH, Prendas Deportivas NZI S.L., ÖHLINS RACING AB, Savatech Industrial Rubber Products and Tyres d.o.o., Department of Mechanical Nuclear and Production Engineering - University of Pisa, University of West Bohemia – New Technologies Research Centre
Project co-funded by the European Commission - DG RTD in the 6th Framework Programme
SIM Project FP6-2005 Transport 4 – 031348 D3.1- Active safety applications specifications
PUBLIC
Revision history Abbreviations list List of figures List of tables Executive summary 1. Introduction 2. Active safety concept definition
3.
2.1 PTW dynamic behaviour 2.2 Suspensions system 2.2.1 Semi active suspension definition and specifications 2.2.2 Sensors specification 2.2.3 Input and output specification 2.2.4 Control logics definition 2.3 Enhanced anti-lock braking system 2.3.1 Brake system definition and specifications 2.3.2 Control logics definition
4. Conclusions References
3.1 HMI information management concept 29 3.1.1 Definition of a concept for an optimal fruition of communication and information for safety and comfort 29 3.1.2 On board information systems: evaluation of rider’s workload 30 3.2 HMI architecture and
References: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] König and all (2007). D 2.1 – Report on analyses of motorcycles accidents database. Pieve, Di Tanna and all (2007). D 2.2 - Technology evaluation and effectiveness, SIM technical detailed targets. Gillespie, Thomas, “Fundamentals of vehicle dynamics”. De Waard, D. (1996). The measurement of drivers 'mental workload. PhD thesis, University of Groningen. Haren, The Netherlands: University of Groningen, Traffic Research Centre. Hart & Staveland, 1988. Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3, 159–177. This project has been co-funded by the European Commission DG RTD in the 6th Framework Programme. The content of this publication is the sole responsibility of the project partners listed herein and does not necessarily represent the view of the European Commission or its services. 43