The English parliamentary system incorporated the ideal of a society where the people have the power. This in turn was backed by a powerful ruling class of nobles and royalty. This provided an efficient bureaucratic government that mirrors the Democratic-Republic system that is currently employed in America today. Resulting from no direct taxation, in exchange for the increase in price of royal services, the majority of the population did not have to pay exorbitant amounts to coexist in an environment with powerful figureheads. The wealth generated was then kept inside of the royalty resulting from the nobles requiring the royal services. The commoner peasant class was not constrained by the government's financial burdens. This lead to the rise in the lower classes economically, which led to better furnishings, diet, and extra capital. The extra money then was poured into the adventurous joint-stock companies which financed voyages to Africa, India, and China. This resulted in lucrative profits from the rare commodities. The government's investment in this industry also led to a large cash flow and an increase in prestige and power in its venture throughout the uncharted seas.
The Absolute Monarchy of France took the idea of prestige and power to a new level. Taxation was placed upon sales, salt trade, and households. This generated huge new wealth for the French government. However, the French government consisted mainly of the Absolute Monarch and his cabinet. The power of the nobles was leeched from them as they sought entertainment and fine foods from the bottomless pockets of the court of the Absolute Monarch. Extravagant events that led to the decreased power of the nobles were brought to a whole new level as King Louis IX reigned. He is quoted as saying "I am the state", because of his absolute influence on the French government. Great power succumbed to this as he envisioned conquering both Spain and Germany. However, other nations stepped in to keep a balanced system of kingdoms within flourishing Europe.
The English idea of the power of the people through parliament and no direct taxes was drastically different from the power strapped people of the French Absolute Monarchy. However, the English and French governments both proved very successful in accomplishing their goals of obtaining huge wealth and power through their radically different ruling systems.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
1. Problem of debt- during this time the French monarchy was deeply in debt after the seven years war. Because France lost a majority of their colonies with the addition of a fragile economic system because of their lack of faith in banks it fell to the Royal government to tap into their own finances to solve the problem…
- 3816 Words
- 16 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Governments benefit from a well-organized and efficient taxation system. The taxation system in France is best described as being diabolical, the taxation system was burdensome upon the middle class and the more prosperous peasants, given that the nobles were largely able to exempt themselves from it.…
- 865 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
After 1650 England used its naval power to break Dutch dominance in overseas trade. The English government also improved its financial position by collecting taxes directly and by creating a central bank. 4. The French government streamlined tax collection, used protective tariffs to promote domestic industries, and improved its transportation network. The French were not, however, able to introduce direct tax collection, tax the land of nobles, or secure low-cost loans.…
- 4515 Words
- 19 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Compare the way in which England and France began developing as…
- 562 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…
- 2606 Words
- 11 Pages
Good Essays -
Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire.…
- 750 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One of those major reasons why I feel that the French form of government is better is because the type of government gives more freedom and protection to the people of the country. As I stated earlier the French paid, gave them food, and trained them just for joining the army. Also they provided the people with multiple jobs. This made their economy better than the English economy which then made the people happier and won’t make them steel and do other things. Thomas Hobbes said that people are naturally cruel greedy and selfish. In my opinion I feel that this is true but with the French’s style of government I don’t think people will be as greedy and selfish as much as the people from England because they are already happy with how the government is treating them. This also made the country more stable because the people wouldn’t have any riots or do anything to go against the government because they are happy with what they have. This then helped the king make decisions to make the government and the country better and more suitable for the people to live…
- 817 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…
- 949 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…
- 718 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
To continue, countries’ looking for new ways to become prosperous was an economic factor that provided an urge for European explorations. The original way for countries to make money was taxation of the people. The nobility was never taxed; the only people who were taxed were the peasants, and the peasants not having money to…
- 826 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Colonial America was a very troubling and dangerous place, but these two chief countries were sought in on their ways. Those core values helped catapult them into the new world in search of freedom, food, and a source of income. England and France were two dominant countries, nonetheless they had their differences socially, economically, and politically which propelled them towards the new world.…
- 377 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
In the American Revolution, colonists were rebelling against their ruler. The colonists who rebelled didn’t kill King George III, while in the French Revolution they were also rebelling against their ruler but unlike the American colonists they beheaded their king Louis XVI. Both rebelling citizens, in the end gained their freedom and equality.…
- 231 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Both the American and French revolutions were focused on liberty and equality. America was trying to gain freedom from the rules, unfair taxation, War debt, and lack of representation from the British. The French Revolution on the other hand wanted to abolish the French monarchy and create a better government in which people could have more of a say in society, and also had similar causes as the American Revolution. They were similar in their causes because both of them were caused because of unfair taxation, war debt, and lack of representation. However, “The American Revolution involved a colonial uprising against an imperial power, which was considered an independence movement. The French Revolution involved citizens rising up against their own country’s leadership and against their own political and economic system, and in that sense was more of a revolution then the American Revolution” ( Armstrong 230). The outcomes were different because the Americans ended British rule by creating the Declaration of Independence which was a great way to solidify society. The French commoners did gain some freedom, but there was still a king controlling them.…
- 1534 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
The English Civil War and the French Revolution are characterized by a change in power that took place within their existing governments in a relatively short period of time. In addition, the English Civil War and the French Revolution were both initiated from the citizen’s unhappiness with the king’s rule. These were caused by a multitude of political, social, and economic problems residing in the English and French monarchies.…
- 1177 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The idea of divine power is what links Queen Elizabeth and King Louis XIV. Queen Elizabeth I was regin England from November 17,1558 through March 23, 1603 her death. King Louis XIV reign France from 14 May 1643 to his death 1 September 1715. He reign much longer than Queen Elizabeth but they both had different styles in ruling over this country. They did however believe they got their strength and power from God. God was leading them to the right path for their country. Elizabeth I was Protestant while King Louis XIV was Catholic and they both showed different degrees of religious freedom to their people. Their attitude towards how God has given them power is one of the major difference that will be seen between Queen Elizabeth I and King…
- 973 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays