Similarities Between American Expansionism

Expansionism in America during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century shared many similarities and differences to that of previous American expansionist ideals. In both cases of American expansionism, the Americans believed that we must expand our borders in order to keep the country running upright. Also, the Americans believed that the United State, being one of the strongest of the nations, had a need to become even stronger. This is shown in the "manifest destiny" of the 1840's. Apart from the similarities, there were also several differences that included the American attempt to stretch their empire across the seas and into other parts of the world.
Throughout history, the United States had come off as a nation that would take what they wanted at any cost. This was prevalent in both cases of expansion as the Americans risked war and national safety for the sake of gaining land. During the early years of expansion, the Americans had pushed aside the Native Americans and whoever else inhabited the land they wanted. They believed that the land was rightfully theirs and that every one else was merely squatting on their territory. This idea was continued into the early twentieth century as the Americans looked to the oceans for new territories to their kingdom.
In contrary to America's earlier beliefs, however, the race for expansion became more of a global competition than that of controlling the surrounding lands. Other countries were quickly seizing control of the remaining uncontrolled territories, and America felt that they needed to stake their clam in imperialism around the world. All the European countries were picking away at the lands still open for taking, and the United States felt the sense that they had to "catch up" with the other nations around the world. America also felt that they were more powerful than ever, with the addition of an improving navy and turned their attention to the seas for conquer. During the earlier attempts of expansion, America had virtually no navy, which made oversea conquest out of their reach, leaving them only the surrounding areas for taking. America now had the opportunity at such territories as Puerto Rico, Cuba, and the Philippines, due to their navy and its power.
Also, during the expansion of the late nineteenth century, there was much more outside resistance towards American expansion. Because of the familiarity of the first expansion, there were not very many disputes over land as there were when America took their hopes for land overseas. With the addition of the Philippines and other islands to the American empire, the U.S. ruled over the Western Hemisphere." America stood at the door of their newly gained territories, not allowing anyone else to enter.
In the new expansion of the American Empire, the Americans, as they did in earlier expansion, saw themselves as only "helping" those who they took under their power. The United States claimed that it was their desire to see their neighboring countries to be stable, orderly, and prosperous. This was also believed in expansion of the 1840's, where the U.S. pushed the Native's aside, presumably "helping" them, but in truth were really stealing the Native’s land, eventually dwindling the Nave American population to a fraction of it’s original size.
In both periods of American expansionism, there are many similarities and differences that occurred, yet the one thing that remained the same in both cases was the strong American desire for greater power and to expand their reach as far out as possible.