Preview

Similarities Between Charles Darnay And Louis Xvi

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
820 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Charles Darnay And Louis Xvi
Charles Darnay and Louis XVI, at first glance, to be very different people. In fact, they are very similar in lifestyle, social class, and personality. While one was the right person at the wrong time one was a remorseful person born to unfortunate family. However unlike Darnay. Louis was very indecisiveness and lacked confidence which is essential to rule a country.
Charles Darnay, born Charles Evremonde, was born into the upper-class alongside his uncle Marquis Evremonde. Unlike his nephew, the Marquis had no sympathy for the lower-class. For example, the Marquis hit a young boy with his carriage and showed no remorse for it. Giving the boy’s father a coin for compensation. Charles saw what his uncle was doing and was disgusted for how he treated the poor. He talked with his uncle trying to convince to stop his ways saying how he “believes our name to be more detested than any name in France.”(Dickens 118). His uncle replied how “Detestation of the high is the involuntary of the low.” (Dickens 118)The Marquis knows what he is doing and is doing nothing for the poor. Seeing how the poor class fed up with
…show more content…
Both were people who wanted best for everyone. Though mostly close in character though they couldn’t be further from each each other. Charles Darnay represents justice and that there is not all is at it seems. Born into aristocracy he was sickened by how the upperclass extorted the poor, and wished he could do something to stop, but was unable to. Louis was born into the royal family and expected great things from. While he had compassion for his people the damages his forefathers had caused lead his people’s resentment for the crown and eventual death. Charles tried helping the people but left when he realized that his uncle would never help. Louis also tried helping his people but his supporting of the American Revolution which added to crippling French treasury and lead to massive

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Louis XVI’s rule was defiantly not similar to the Rule of Napoleons rule when you get down to the basics. Louis XVI and Napoleon Bonaparte were two of the most significant rulers in French history for many different reasons. Being so young the inexperienced Louis XVI led France into the beginning of a bloody French Revolution. Napoleon on the other hand launched France to the top in Europe shortly after. Louis XVI and Napoleon differed in three main categories including: qualifications, domestic policy, and foreign policy.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James and Charles were considerably different in their beliefs and attitudes. James was a confident and extravagant king and Charles was ill at ease and lacked confidence.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV strove vigorously for supremacy in foreign affairs. He was to use his foreign policy to establish a universal monarchy for himself or alternatively to use it to secure natural frontiers for France thus improving its defenses. He worked successfully to create an absolutist and centralized state. During his reign Louis was involved in four major wars, some of which Louis may be accountable as the provocateur; however, I believe that mainly his motives were purely defensive. The war of Devolution served as a pretext which nettled him part of Flanders, although the Dutch then moved against him with the Triple Alliance. Louis was determined to crush Holland and this began the third of the Dutch wars, which depleted his treasury. Louis proved an incredibly extravagant spender, dispensing huge sums of money to finance the royal court. The following ten years the king limited his policies to diplomacy. Louis continued the nobility's exemption from taxes but forced its member into financial dependence to the crown and the provincial nobles also lost political power. Louis does have a genuine concern for his country and despite his dubious methods he does manage to secure the territories that he wishes to secure. He curtailed local authorities and created specialized ministries. Louis's grandson retained the Spanish throne but the war of Spanish Succession left France in great debt and a weakened military. Louis used the bourgeoisie to build his centralized bureaucracy. He illustrated new administrative methods to make him more in control. Louis's general Colbert worked to improve the French economy. Colbert worked to create a favorable balance of trade and increase France's colonial holdings. He achieved a reputation for his work of improving the state of French manufacturing and bringing the economy back from the brink of bankruptcy. He reduced the national debt through more efficient taxation. His principal taxation devices included the aides, the douanes, the…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Darnay Quotes

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages

    "'This property and France are lost to me, ' said the nephew sadly; 'I renounce them'" (Chapter 9). This quote indirectly talks Charles Darnay, since it describes one of his decisions. Darnay made the choice to give up his French name and association with his French family because he believes that the family has done wrong and wants nothing to do with it. He changes his name from Evermonde to Darnay in order to hide his French heritage. He later tells the truth to Lucie’s father which is not a good decision because his father and uncle imprisoned Lucie’s father falsely. This shows that Charles is a caring and responsible gentleman who does not only care for money and power because when he gave up his name he was giving up a lavish lifestyle and lots of money. The welfare of the people is more important to him, and he does not want to be associated with a family that has caused them so much harm. In a way this may show slight cowardness in Charles. Yes the name is associated badly but why not show that there is good in the name too. He could have used the money to help others and show that he was willing to pay for his relative’s mistakes yet he hides and wants nothing to do with it. He ran from the problem.…

    • 2950 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Jefferson Clinton was one of the greatest presidents to govern the United States as opposed to the Bush's. Clinton proved to the world our preeminence by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bush's proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in similar ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and character led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they governed their country was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings failure was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The most important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the failure of the Stuart Kings was control.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their countries. Firstly,they were both autocrats,in that all decisions of state had to be approved by them.Secondly,they both wanted to curb the power of an ambitious nobility.However,they achieved this aim differently; Louis made his court at Versailles the centre of power,so the nobility had to spend all their time there if they wanted to have any influence.This kept them away from their own provincial power bases,making it hard for them to plot against the king.Peter on the other hand tortured and murdered any nobles he suspected of disloyalty.The main difference between the two was that Louis was ruling a cultural advanced,modern state - Russia under Peter was still very backward compared to major European states,so Peter worked hard to modernize Russia.Finally,both built up strong armies and used them for territorial expansion, thus increasing the prestige of their…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charlemagne and King Louis have very similar social backgrounds because they both were born in a royal family and took the throne as kings. Charlemagne was born in 742,in the Merovingian family, from with the franks chose their kings from. He was the son of Beterada of Laon and Pepin the Short. His father became the king of franks in 751. After Pepin’s death in 768, Charlemagne became the co-ruler with his brother, Carloman. But about three years later, Carloman died in 711, leaving Charlemagne the sole ruler and king of the Franks. Charlemagne had multiple wives…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stating the fact the if his father had not died, Louis Auguste wouldn't have become the next throne. At least until later on. Louis Auguste was ill prepared for the throne, considering he was very young. When he inherited the throne as Louis XVI, France was in a massive debt. He was immature, lacked self-confidence and also lacked sufficient strength of character and decisiveness. Due to those terms, he was a weak king. If his father was still the king, France wouldn't be as burdened with debts and under heavy taxation as to how it was during Louis Auguste being the king. Louis XIV had a brilliant minister of finance, named Jean-Baptiste Colbert, who drastically reduced the debt of France and helped make it the wealthiest country in Europe.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this quotation, Dickens is trying to show the sympathy Charles Darnay got from the people, who moments ago where cheering to get him killed. "(...) tears immediately rolled down several ferocious countenances," Dickens wrote. He wanted the reader to know the nature of these people in the French Revolution. Dickens wanted us to see the cold hearted ways of these people, but he also wanted us to see why they did it,…

    • 1253 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intro Carl Brashear and Charles D’antoine had very similar lives. Both being a different colour to the white republic these men showed how determined they were. However Carl Brashear was racially abused and Charles was discriminated against due to the colour of his skin. Carl Brashear Carl Brashear was a United States Navy sailor. He was the first African American to become a U.S. Navy Master Diver, climbing to the position in 1970.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Allied Powers assigned Charles X to be king even though he was the younger brother of Charles XVIII , France’s ruler before Napoleon’s rule . The nation had revolutions at the late 1700s breaking their social class system, denying people of the higher class to have hereditary rights giving the poor a better life. Another revolution is predicted to rise today with their government issues waking up the battle of liberalism vs conservatism once more.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The French Revolution was a time period of rebellion in the late 1700s throughout France. Charles Dickens wrote A Tale of Two Cities roughly sixty years after the French Revolution, starting as installments in a magazine then publishing his works in a book. The French Revolution was a time when man was extremely inhumane to his fellow man. This inhumanity is seen throughout Dickens’ novel in many ways. He proves that the cycle of man’s inhumanity to man is never ending when people come to watch Darnay’s trial for entertainment, the Marquis kills Gaspard’s child, and the Evermonde brothers kill Madame Defarge’s family.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Darnay Essay

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens, the character Charles Darnay is a man in his twenties, with long, dark hair. He is a man full of honor and virtues, and seems like the "upstanding gentleman" in the story. His rejection of his uncle, the Marquis Évremonde, because of his arrogance and snobby attitude, shows how good-hearted he is. He has no real enemies or hatred towards anyone, but manages to maintain a strong retinue of friends, and his honesty, respect and heroism help with the reader's perception of him greatly.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The War of 1812 was finally over, Britain and America had signed the treaty of Ghent to end this long and taxing war. Yet for many of the soldiers, far in the southwest, the war was about to take an astounding turn. The Treaty of Ghent was signed on December 24, 1814, but the news of it did not reach either the British or the American troops in the Louisiana southwest. General Major Andrew Jackson had the entire battle thought and planned out, it was all ready for action, and the soldiers all waited. A few days earlier the British and American forces had engaged in a battle about nine miles away from New Orleans. This was only a part of the plan in order to draw the British forces to Chalmette Plantation. The Battle of New Orleans was an important battle of the War of 1812, because it showed that America was a legitimate military force through easily defeating the British forces, propelling Andrew…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays