Similarities Between Garrison Leadership And Combat Leadership

A successful workforce cannot be measured by one type of leadership alone. The way we manage our team members and the success of the team depend on several factors: the people involved; what situation we are in and the type environment we are working in. Generally, we have two styles of leadership in the Army: Garrison leadership and Combat leadership.
Before I elaborate further, I can just break this down and use this essay as an example and an analogy to initially compare these two leadership styles. This essay was intended to get people to write an essay so that we may improve on our grammar, punctuation, capitalization, spelling and actually using proper words in proper sequence. It’s also to highlight what is considered a run along sentence and other deficiencies. Based on this one example, this can be considered as garrison leadership. The words often misused in the military which has been seen on counselings, awards, memorandums and speeches. All of which when spotted, creates a less professional environment due to audience judgment. Not only was this essay created to improve writing skills. It is also about the Army and the profession we are in. Therefore this essay serves as a two way function. To refine writing ability of soldiers and to
Combat leadership as I said before is a point A to point B. There is more to it, but the point that I’m trying to make is that combat is now more reaction and how to properly take action that you learned in garrison. Like garrison leadership, combat has its own separate list of stresses, shortfalls and different angles of approach to success. Also, like the garrison environment. Combat has its own set of difficulties such as resources, maintaining full 24 hour combat readiness at high alerts, complacency that kills, PTSD, death, injuries and living environments. There are so many factors that a leader in a combat environment has to take into account to ensure mission