Preview

Similarities Between Hitler And Russia

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
685 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Similarities Between Hitler And Russia
IV. Differences

Although both Stalinist USSR and Hitler's Nazi Germany shared some similarities in terms of the means of their rule, these two totalitarian regimes differed from each other in economic and social aspects.

(1) Economic Institution

The USSR - Collectivization
The Five Year Plan started under Lenin and continued by Stalin which enabled the USSR to develop economically but at a great cost to the Soviet people. Indeed, Stalin strengthened the state's existing dominance: legal private entreprise above the level of highly-restricted individual production and commerce practically ceased. However, the Five Year Plans for industry were ambitious and far-reaching. They assumed nothing less than the transformation of the Soviet Union
…show more content…
Private enterprises were to be eliminated. Talking about collectivization, it was a policy to transform traditional agriculture in the Soviet Union and to reduce the economic power of the Kulaks. It had a serious impact on the USSR and created a man-made famine in Ukraine. As Richard Charques said in his book, "But among the ghastly fruits of the campaign for collectivization was the 'man-made famine' of 1931-32 in the Ukraine and the northern Caucasus, where it had been resisted most fiercely and where the fields had lain almost totally neglected. There were millions of deaths from starvation in these regions." Yet, despite all the problems, the plan was successful in many aspects. The USSR's economy improved dramatically in just 10 years. Housing, sanitation and shopping all struggled to keep up with the pace of …show more content…
This was called 'Autarky', meaning self-sufficient by suspending and terminating foreign help and supplies. Hermann Goering’s Four Year Plan was therefore proposed to get the army and industry ready for war in 4 years. However as a result of this, businesses within or out of the country were strictly controlled; although businessmen were encouraged to invest more, at the same time they were not allowed to raise wages to workers and workers could only be sent to other factories. Hence this may lower the workers' incentives to work. Thus, these policies had a lot advantages though, it had also caused massive economic problems and discontentment among Germans despite the aim of these policies were to tackle the devastated impacts by the Great Depression and restoring Germany from a high unemployment rate into full

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To a greater extent, I do agree that collectivisation was an essential contribution to stalin’s transformation of the economy, for example, it helped increase production and with it came the increase in industrialisation. Although there were many clear failures with collectivisation, in purely economic terms, it was mainly successful. However, I also think, that to a certain extent, it was other factors such as the 3 5 year plans that helped transform the economy.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joseph Stalin Dbq Analysis

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Joseph Stalin established a modern totalitarian government in Soviet Russia. He is known as the “Man of Steel”. A totalitarianism is a type of government that takes total, centralized, state control over every aspect of public and private life of their people. His rule had changed the people of his empire in numerous ways. Stalin had total control over economic needs. According to document 6 “By 1940 Russia produced more pig iron than Germany, and far more than Britain or France. Numbers of cattle grew in the 1920s, but fell increasingly during the collectivization of agriculture after 1929, and by 1940 hardly exceeded the figure for 1920. Since 1940 the industrial development of the Soviet Union has been impressive, but agricultural production has continued to be plumiding”. The document illustrates how pig iron had significantly increased as a result of the “Five Year Plan”, however heavy industry led to expense of food supplies. This would cause limited production of consumer goods. It caused a step back because of the severe shortages of housing, food, clothing as well as other necessary goods. The Five Year Plan didn’t help much to excel their economic as Stalin hoped, it impacted by creating famine. Stalin rising to power promised an economic boom for Russia however, in that process many people suffered and died of starvation. According to document 5, “The purge began its last,…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the period before 1941, Stalin was able to institute his economical policies of Collectivization and the 5-year plans. ‘Backwards was to be defeated and enslaved’. Russia had to make up for 100 years of lost time for fear of being consumed by the western world. Stalin, sole leader of the Bolsheviks by the late 1920’s, believed that Russia could modernize their Agricultural and Industrial sectors through his policies.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are widely regarded as the greatest tyrants of the twentieth century, accountable for more violent deaths than any other leaders in history. Both have been individually and collectively labeled mass murders, tyrants, “authors of terror”, and even “twin demons of the twentieth century”. The shared political methodology of both dictators was heavily based around totalitarianism. Their apparatus of power and repression led to absolute and ruthless authority over the population of their respective nations. The disparity in Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin’s rise to power, economy, policies, totalitarian rule and methodology confirm who the greater oppressor was.…

    • 3537 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The degree of totalitarianism in a country is a very controversial topic between historians. Yet, in this essay it a personal opinion is given towards proving that Stalin was more totalitarian than Hitler. In order to start this persuasive essay, the time period of both regimes and context must be known. Firstly, Josef Stalin was a Georgian man, who ruled Russia Between 1929 and 1953 and made it a totalitarian state. He came to power after Lenin had died using many ways and opportunities such as the Lenin testament, disputes over NEP, and his cunning character and position. As compared to Adolf Hitler, who was also not born in the country he ruled (Germany) but was an Austrian. Hitler came to power due to reasons such as economic crisis, impressing the people by promising them things far different from pervious government, Versailles Treaty. Since the context of both regimes are now known, one must be first clear on the definition of a totalitarian before claiming which ruler was more totalitarian than the other. A totalitarian state is one that is centralized or in other words ruled by one party, it is also dictatorial and enforces complete subservience to the government. Therefore due to the evidence that is found, it is argued that: Stalin’s rule over Russia seemed more totalitarian than Hitler’s regime over Germany in regards to actions taken and goals set towards politics, society, and the economy.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Nazi Germany and Communist Russia were different in their ideology and how they came to power but were similar in some ways. They both used the same tactics to stop uprisings and to silence party rivals but the question that still remains is which regime was worse? With all the knowledge we have now of the atrocities that both regimes committed not only against their own people but to people outside of their countries I don’t believe one was worse than the other but that both were equally horrendous. They were both set on maintaining power at any costs even if it meant murdering innocent individuals, at least a few million individuals were killed under Stalin and under Hitler's regime 11 million non-combatants were killed. If Hitler hadn't…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin’s policies in the 1930’s were both successful and not so successful for a variety of reasons which will be discussed throughout. In the 1930’s Stalin had to use many different devises in order to keep his dominance in leadership. These changes included Collectivization, Industrialisation in the first and second five year plans. Other policies which are discussed are The role of women, religion, arts and culture and education.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin and Hitler emerged when political and economic instability had crippled the USSR and Germany in the 1920s. They began making improvements which encouraged their people to believe that prosperity awaited them. This notion was unfortunately a delusion as both figures would eventually rule by decree. Despite treading on different paths of dictatorship, both figures still find some commonalities.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Stalin of Russia

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Before Stalin came to power, Russia was at least fifty years behind in relation to industrialisation, compared to its rivals; the westernised capitalist countries. Stalin had planned to abolish this fifty year gap in just a short ten years. In order to achieve this, Russia had to be less dependent on its Agricultural lifestyle and more reliant on industrialisation. The production rate of Russia was low compared to other countries, and Stalin felt that in order to survive a potential attack against an anti-communist country, the USSR needed to invest in materials such as coal, iron, steel and power in order to defend itself. To achieve the vast production of the USSR, Stalin had created a set of plans called the ‘five year plans’. The first of these plans were aimed at expanding and modernising already existing factories, to establish new factories, and relocate those in the west closer to the east. The workers suffered in result to these plans, and were set unrealistic goals which they needed to achieve. They were given no leave and had to work for over 11 hours of intense labour at a time, though there is no doubt that…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Therefore, collectivisation had a negative impact on Russian rural life as the total output by the agronomists dropped until well after they had been sent to the collective farms. This can be seen by the statistics given by Nove as all types of livestock decreased because of how people where eating them to defy Collectivisation and get enough food to live on during the famine. Grain procurement continued to stay at around 60 million tons to help the growing industrialisation of places like Magnitogorsk. Taking this into account, collectivisation had a massive negative short term impact on rural life as Stalin only saw it as bringing the countryside to heel and making sure that ‘it was the countryside, not the towns, which went hungry if the harvest was bad’ as shown by source 7.It was more about collecting what they needed from the farmers rather than improving their standard of…

    • 1546 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin’s five-year plans and collectivisation policies were not the first attempt to reorganise the soviet workforce. The New Economic Policy was applied in March 1921, which was a mixture of socialism and capitalism. By 1927 the NEP had revived Soviet industry to 1913 levels and was successful in heavy goods, however agriculture was in turmoil. Stalin would no longer allow the peasants to threaten the cities – and the government – with their power to hold back food. He felt he could kill two birds with one stone: agriculture was to be updated on a collective and more politically acceptable basis bringing the still largely peasant population under party control.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduced in 1929, Collectivisation was the swift process employed by Stalin to gather all the smallholdings of pre-Industrial Russia into large grouped (or collective) farms, controlled by the government as opposed to the peasants. The aim of this was to swiftly increase agricultural output, the revenue from which (if traded internationally) could be used to kick-start industrialisation. It was, of course, important to Stalin that the government controlled this process entirely as part of the idea of a centralised state, but also to ensure that targets were met. Controlling everything would mean production would be far more efficient, grain procurement would be far easier and peasants would have no choice but to hand the grain over (so potentially reducing the need for requisitioning and the potential of peasants fighting back). Collectivisation would also – the government hoped – instil a sense of socialism amongst the people by reducing the right to private property and, if collectivisation went to plan and gave marked results, then Stalin's position as leader would…

    • 2596 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second World War was one of the most devastating conflicts ever encountered, fuelled by two ruthless dictators that aimed to assert their own ideologies on the rest of the world. By comparing Nazism to Stalinism, highlights the similar authoritarian measures they embraced in order to obtain their political goals. Hitler and Stalin were seen as figureheads of their respective states. They had support among their people that enabled them to exert their influence in a corrupt manner and to form powerful militaries that could sustain their ambitious aims. However, it is this juxtaposition that limits our comparison for understanding these two forms of government. It brings notice to the notion that although these two governments possess similar characteristics in terms of oppressiveness to achieve their aims, they actually have different ideologies that are completely opposed one another on the political spectrum.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays