Rousseau did not have a pleasant childhood since his father abandoned him, and his mother died after few days he was born. As we know he introduced to us on his book Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality theories of property in which he stated that property is the origin of civil society, the result of cooperation and that property rights were created by the wealthy people to protect their own properties. As we read both of the books we can realized that when they wrote about the theories of property they wrote it from different perspective, but as readers we can contrast and compare their theories. In this paper it will be argued that Locke’s property of God and Rousseau’s that the origin of civil society theories are the most superior or more moral all theories on their
Rousseau did not have a pleasant childhood since his father abandoned him, and his mother died after few days he was born. As we know he introduced to us on his book Discourse On The Origin Of Inequality theories of property in which he stated that property is the origin of civil society, the result of cooperation and that property rights were created by the wealthy people to protect their own properties. As we read both of the books we can realized that when they wrote about the theories of property they wrote it from different perspective, but as readers we can contrast and compare their theories. In this paper it will be argued that Locke’s property of God and Rousseau’s that the origin of civil society theories are the most superior or more moral all theories on their